|
Post by supercheese on Dec 10, 2007 1:20:01 GMT -5
Just out of curiosity why are WWE suspending wrestlers for taking performance enhancing substances...
The show is scripted, and all results are pre-determined. So then it's not as if some wrestlers are gaining an unfair advantage.
Or do the WWE suspend wrestlers for using them due to the effects they may have on a superstar?
|
|
|
Post by thesunbeast on Dec 10, 2007 1:32:11 GMT -5
It's a combination of the latter and the mainstream.
|
|
|
Post by dh03grad on Dec 10, 2007 2:23:52 GMT -5
Of course the wrestler is gaining an unfair advantage. If Chris Masters got off steroids in OVW, his push would have just went to someone who did have the "right look".
|
|
|
Post by Lair of the Shadow MaDaBa on Dec 10, 2007 2:32:41 GMT -5
But wouldn't the guy with "the right look" have been on steroids himself?
|
|
|
Post by dh03grad on Dec 10, 2007 2:38:11 GMT -5
But wouldn't the guy with "the right look" have been on steroids himself? Yes. if Masters went clean and off steroids, someone who would use it would get the push instead.
|
|