Ass Dan
King Koopa
Curious about extra lines
Have you seen me?
Posts: 12,259
|
Post by Ass Dan on May 30, 2008 1:47:06 GMT -5
They and Rage Against the Machine I....I....you compared LB and RATM.....  |
|
Corporate H
Grimlock
He Buries Them Alive
Posts: 13,829
|
Post by Corporate H on May 30, 2008 3:34:29 GMT -5
Limp Bizkit had their moments, but they really weren't innovators, in my opinion. They had a decent sound sometimes, but they were basically just a product of the late '90s. There wasn't really anything too interesting happening on a Bizkit record.
|
|
|
|
Post by willywonka666 on May 30, 2008 7:12:03 GMT -5
I still feel that in a few more years they should stop inducting-I don't see anyone worthy of being inducted who got their start in the late 90's on. Oasis is one of the last bands I see going in.
|
|
|
|
Post by Big BosskMan on May 30, 2008 9:49:52 GMT -5
Limp Bizkit in the HOF?
There is only one appropriate 3 word response to this questions.
f***. And. No.
|
|
|
|
Post by BlackJackRobby on May 30, 2008 11:10:21 GMT -5
There have most certainly been worse people in the Hall of Fame then them.
Madonna I'm looking directly at your pop/club music ass.
|
|
Franchise
Hank Scorpio
No you didn't.
Ronnie Garvin, you idiot! I like steak, not soup, Ronnie Garvin!
Posts: 6,879
|
Post by Franchise on May 30, 2008 11:15:16 GMT -5
They and Rage Against the Machine I....I....you compared LB and RATM..... I wasn't trying to compare them, I was just saying that both LB and RATM brought rap-metal to the forefront. Hell, I prefer RATM over LB myself. lol |
|
|
|
Post by Clash, Never a Meter Maid on May 30, 2008 12:31:16 GMT -5
Guys...you know this was a joke thread, right?  Also, I've attached a poll now, with a Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends option. |
|
|
|
Post by IsaacMKII on May 30, 2008 12:37:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The"threadicidal"bristolspapa on May 30, 2008 13:23:29 GMT -5
Ha ha ha...no. I wouldn't be surprise if the HOF does it though. Madonna is in but no Carol Kane? Once again I ask why no Carol Kane dammit? Are any of the wrecking crew in? |
|
|
|
Post by willywonka666 on May 30, 2008 14:18:29 GMT -5
Ha ha ha...no. I wouldn't be surprise if the HOF does it though. Madonna is in but no Carol Kane? Once again I ask why no Carol Kane dammit?  You mean her? |
|
icansleep
Don Corleone
Wasn't Hornswoggled
Posts: 1,828
|
Post by icansleep on May 30, 2008 15:49:50 GMT -5
I'd like to see it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dynamite Kid on May 30, 2008 16:07:49 GMT -5
Limp Bizkit had their moments, but they really weren't innovators, in my opinion. They had a decent sound sometimes, but they were basically just a product of the late '90s. There wasn't really anything too interesting happening on a Bizkit record. I disagree. Wes Borland did some real interesting stuff with his tunings and riffs, and two hand tapping. |
|
NIXON
Unicron
Hail to the Chief Bootknocker
Posts: 3,354
|
Post by NIXON on May 30, 2008 17:00:09 GMT -5
Welp, considering that the Rock & Roll hall of fame means pretty much nothing, and considering albums sold, impact, and being flat out the biggest band in the world at one point, I would say yes, they should go in. I am not a fan of their music, and I think Durst should be beaten for some of his lyrics, but they have achieved a great deal of success with their awful music. I mean, they put the Sex Pistols in.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dynamite Kid on May 30, 2008 17:05:01 GMT -5
The last sentence of that post is the greatest thing I've ever read, ever.
|
|
Blindkarevik
Grimlock
Rock... Paper... Straight-edge!
I Like To <blank>
Posts: 14,343
|
Post by Blindkarevik on May 30, 2008 19:14:15 GMT -5
I have no respect for the Hall Of Fame, and I have no respect for Limp Bizkit.
So they make a good fit.
|
|
|
|
Post by gmanquik on May 30, 2008 22:34:45 GMT -5
I've got two words for all of you who don't want to see Limp Bizkit in the HOF...
MATT FREAKIN' HARDY! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by charlie ford on May 30, 2008 22:38:22 GMT -5
I liked LB as a teen. But now i can only stand some of there songs. LB has no right to be in any hall...
|
|
|
|
Post by Bob Schlapowitz on May 30, 2008 22:55:19 GMT -5
If KISS (9 years eligible) and Alice Cooper (14 years eligible) aren't in yet, than Limp Bizkit shouldn't be anywhere near it at any time.
|
|
|
|
Post by marvelocity on May 30, 2008 23:26:23 GMT -5
I still feel that in a few more years they should stop inducting-I don't see anyone worthy of being inducted who got their start in the late 90's on. Oasis is one of the last bands I see going in. Scary thought, but I think you may be right. Here's a link of who is eligible over the next years. No one that really stands out after Smashing Pumpkins in 2015, Pearl Jam in 2016 and Radiohead in 2017: www.futurerockhall.com/year.php?eligible_year=2008I still have hope for Coldplay - if they can find their own sound and not be such a blatant Oasis, Radiohead, and U2 rip-off (they're a pretty good rip-off, though). You have to think Kanye West will get in, and John Legend has all the tools to be a great musician. But maybe it's just too soon to tell. |
|
|
|
Post by Dynamite Kid on May 31, 2008 17:28:24 GMT -5
Dr. Dre? Or is he already in?
|
|
