londonfan
Bubba Ho-Tep
I mark for Paul London/Paul London action figures
Posts: 530
|
Post by londonfan on Aug 26, 2009 20:13:04 GMT -5
DX vs. UT and Kane at Mania..? Maybe some other PPV but Mania...?
Tomko.
|
|
|
Post by Man Hating Horace on Aug 26, 2009 20:13:09 GMT -5
Jimmy Snuka started it, Jimmy Snuka could come back and end it.
|
|
|
Post by MichaelMartini on Aug 26, 2009 20:17:26 GMT -5
DX vs. UT and Kane at Mania..? Maybe some other PPV but Mania...? Tomko. Why not? It's not the match doesn't have star power. The first Mania main event was a tag. All four of those guys are legends and should be doing exhibition type matches. Taker fought Mark freakin Henry at mania a few years ago when they were starting to make a big deal about the streak.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2009 20:19:47 GMT -5
I honestly think M.V.P. should
|
|
londonfan
Bubba Ho-Tep
I mark for Paul London/Paul London action figures
Posts: 530
|
Post by londonfan on Aug 26, 2009 20:21:23 GMT -5
Because it's a tag match and you can't put one person's singles streak on the line in a tag match.
I like the match-up. Just doesn't make any sense for Mania.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2009 20:24:17 GMT -5
Because it's a tag match and you can't put one person's singles streak on the line in a tag match. I like the match-up. Just doesn't make any sense for Mania. Mania XIX says hi
|
|
|
Post by BorneAgain on Aug 26, 2009 20:28:10 GMT -5
I'm curious fellow crappers, what would be your reaction if there was a 2/3 falls match between Taker and a heel, and the opponent scored a fall, but lost the match?
It could be a potential build for the heel as he continually brings up his victory (stolen from him by technicality) and be something than hangs over the Undertaker for the following twelve months until the eventual rematch between the two.
Or it could be a lousy gimmick that merely cheapens the streak. I myself am not entirely sure how it would come across.
|
|
Dub H
Crow T. Robot
Captain Pixel: the Game Master
I ❤ Aniki
Posts: 47,880
|
Post by Dub H on Aug 26, 2009 20:28:11 GMT -5
I honestly think M.V.P. should This could be the start of a beautiful friendship
|
|
londonfan
Bubba Ho-Tep
I mark for Paul London/Paul London action figures
Posts: 530
|
Post by londonfan on Aug 26, 2009 20:29:54 GMT -5
Because it's a tag match and you can't put one person's singles streak on the line in a tag match. I like the match-up. Just doesn't make any sense for Mania. Mania XIX says hi That wasn't a tag match. It was a handi-capped match. Plus, it was stupid.
|
|
|
Post by MichaelMartini on Aug 26, 2009 20:30:29 GMT -5
Because it's a tag match and you can't put one person's singles streak on the line in a tag match. I like the match-up. Just doesn't make any sense for Mania. Undertaker is not contractually obligated to have one on one matches every wrestlemania. He was supposed to team with Nathan Jones to fight Show and A-Train. The streak is not a featured event, like the MITB match. That's just the way it happened. Edge had one going himself. It's like when Susan Lucci was nominated 11 times or whatever for an Emmy and didn't win. It's not like they had to nominate every year to keep the streak going. Get what I'm saying? DX vs Taker and Kane makes the most sense for Mania.
|
|
|
Post by MichaelMartini on Aug 26, 2009 20:32:58 GMT -5
I'm curious fellow crappers, what would be your reaction if there was a 2/3 falls match between Taker and a heel, and the opponent scored a fall, but lost the match? It could be a potential build for the heel as he continually brings up his victory (stolen from him by technicality) and be something than hangs over the Undertaker for the following twelve months until the eventual rematch between the two. Or it could be a lousy gimmick that merely cheapens the streak. I myself am not entirely sure how it would come across. That is a fantastic idea. Especially if the heel scored the first pinfall, and Taker gets the next two. The heel could brag about how without the stip he would've ended it. This would be perfect for Punk!
|
|
|
Post by hbk4ever09 on Aug 26, 2009 20:38:19 GMT -5
I could realistically giving it to a filler like Big Show.
"omg look how big he is, how can undertaker ever.....TRIANLGE CHOKEEEEEEE 18-0!!!"
|
|
londonfan
Bubba Ho-Tep
I mark for Paul London/Paul London action figures
Posts: 530
|
Post by londonfan on Aug 26, 2009 20:41:22 GMT -5
Because it's a tag match and you can't put one person's singles streak on the line in a tag match. I like the match-up. Just doesn't make any sense for Mania. Undertaker is not contractually obligated to have one on one matches every wrestlemania. He was supposed to team with Nathan Jones to fight Show and A-Train. The streak is not a featured event, like the MITB match. That's just the way it happened. Edge had one going himself. It's like when Susan Lucci was nominated 11 times or whatever for an Emmy and didn't win. It's not like they had to nominate every year to keep the streak going. Get what I'm saying? DX vs Taker and Kane makes the most sense for Mania. In all due respect, it makes zero sense, let alone the *most sense* Regardless of what you say here, the streak is absolutely a featured event at Wrestlemania - same as the MITB match. They make a HUGE deal out of it every year. Whether or not he was supposed to team with Nathan Jones is irrelevant. He didn't. He still went into that match on his own. Not to mention that was seven years ago. A ton of attention has been given to the streak in every Mania since then, as mentiond above. Most importantly - UT has *already* beaten HHH at Mania. He *just beat* HBK last year at Mania. Putting the streak up against them as a team the very next year makes sense...? Again, love the match-up. Do it Survivor Series or something. But for Mania it just doesn't make any sense.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2009 20:43:57 GMT -5
I could realistically giving it to a filler like Big Show. "omg look how big he is, how can undertaker ever.....TRIANLGE CHOKEEEEEEE 18-0!!!" They did already Taker beat him and A-Train
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2009 20:45:25 GMT -5
I honestly think M.V.P. should This could be the start of a beautiful friendship I'm a massive MVP Mark and I really just plain don't think it should be him MVP's older then he looks If anyone should go over Taker(Not saying anybody needs to) it should be someone who's Young and Needs Solidifying
|
|
|
Post by hbk4ever09 on Aug 26, 2009 20:45:53 GMT -5
Yeah when guys are "fighing for the right" to face Taker at WM (koslov, hbk, jbl) it's a big deal. There's really only 3 options as i see it: Y2J, Cena, and Punk. I don't see the Punk feud lasting THAT long, or them revisiting it at that time. Jericho can work as we heard rumblings of a potenital feud between the two. Cena's been 900% discussed. If only a guy like Sheamus can get big (he'd have to go to SD and obviously it's tool late to do it by April). You know he'd lose but can still look good.
What about Christian?
|
|
Dub H
Crow T. Robot
Captain Pixel: the Game Master
I ❤ Aniki
Posts: 47,880
|
Post by Dub H on Aug 26, 2009 20:47:18 GMT -5
Yeah when guys are "fighing for the right" to face Taker at WM (koslov, hbk, jbl) it's a big deal. There's really only 3 options as i see it: Y2J, Cena, and Punk. I don't see the Punk feud lasting THAT long, or them revisiting it at that time. Jericho can work as we heard rumblings of a potenital feud between the two. Cena's been 900% discussed. If only a guy like Sheamus can get big (he'd have to go to SD and obviously it's tool late to do it by April). You know he'd lose but can still look good. What about Christian? I would mark for Christian vs Undertaker,but you know WWE and Christian relationship,doesnt matter how over he is,never happening And John Morrison?it looks like he is becoming a big superstar
|
|
|
Post by hbk4ever09 on Aug 26, 2009 20:49:55 GMT -5
Morrison would be cool, everyone knows he'd lose but it would be a sick match with some great spots.
Get Hogan, put out some "newz" that Hogan is demanding his creative control, and then everyone will watch with heart attacks at every leg drop and close call, only to have Taker go over again.
|
|
Dub H
Crow T. Robot
Captain Pixel: the Game Master
I ❤ Aniki
Posts: 47,880
|
Post by Dub H on Aug 26, 2009 20:51:23 GMT -5
Morrison would be cool, everyone knows he'd lose but it would be a sick match with some great spots. Get Hogan, put out some "newz" that Hogan is demanding his creative control, and then everyone will watch with heart attacks at every leg drop and close call, only to have Taker go over again. The IWC would mark more for a Rock vs Undertaker at wrestlemania I know it will never happen and i can live with it,but it would mean rating
|
|
|
Post by hbk4ever09 on Aug 26, 2009 20:53:33 GMT -5
If Rock comes for one match you lock him in a room until he agrees to face HBK.
|
|