Concerning the "War"...

[Ragnal]

I have to ask...does anyone in the WWE fandom care about TNA being on Monday nights? Over on the TNA forums I hear people say that they're excited, that TNA's gonna overtake Raw, and if you're not excited you're not a "true fan"...while over here in WWE's boards I barely hear a peep about TNA or see anyone excited about this war.

So...does anyone here even think it's a war? Or care about TNA?

[N E O G E O B O Y S]

I totally forget that today tna had a show

[Deleted]

It's cool that I can flip from one to the other during slow points. I'm glad there's a replay of TNA on Thursday because, quite frankly, I'm going to focus on Raw more.

[Barrock]

Considering iMPACT was taped last week, I'm sure that put a damper on people's anticipation.

[bob]

Mar 15, 2010 22:52:37 GMT -5 @irontyger said:

It's cool that I can flip from one to the other during slow points. I'm glad there's a replay of TNA on Thursday because, quite frankly, I'm going to focus on Raw more.

Spike TV is ending the replays on Thursday

[Brickstone Kid]

No...don't care. Forgot it was on, actually.

[Spankymac is sick of the swiss]

Most WWE fans don't even know that TNA exists, let alone that it's "competing" with WWE.

[MasonK565]

Mar 15, 2010 22:53:43 GMT -5 bob said:

Mar 15, 2010 22:52:37 GMT -5 @irontyger said:

It's cool that I can flip from one to the other during slow points. I'm glad there's a replay of TNA on Thursday because, quite frankly, I'm going to focus on Raw more.

Spike TV is ending the replays on Thursday

i think that is a great move by TNA and spike

[Cyno]

I'll just watch Impact on Thursdays like I normally do. Hard to buy into the whole "Monday Night Wars" returning thing when I can watch Raw and Impact in their entirety on different nights.

[brocklesnar1]

TNA?

Seriously though. I just prefer WWE and see maybe 20mins of tna a month and thats only because of jeff and rvd if they doing something really good.

P.S. i love hearing when tna's ratings are low

[American Dragon]

I completely forgot TNA was on tonight.

[i.Sarita.com]

It gives me something to watch during the slow parts of RAW...which is just about 2/3rds of RAW generally speaking.

[BigJerichool222]

I acknowledged TNA when it had a show on Thursdays, like...I knew that Thursdays meant the only wrestling on was TNA. I didn't watch it, but I knew that it was on.

Now that they've moved to Mondays, I almost always forget that it's on. Last week it took a commercial at like 10:30 to remind me and this week it was a comment in the Raw thread.

Monday nights are Raw nights; always have, always will be. To me TNA doesn't really exist in a way because now that they moved to Raw nights, I really don't pay attention to it anymore.

[Deleted]

Mar 15, 2010 22:53:43 GMT -5 bob said:

Mar 15, 2010 22:52:37 GMT -5 @irontyger said:

It's cool that I can flip from one to the other during slow points. I'm glad there's a replay of TNA on Thursday because, quite frankly, I'm going to focus on Raw more.

Spike TV is ending the replays on Thursday

Well, there goes that idea.

[xxshoyuweeniexx]

I'm not buying into the "war" crap because it'll take years before they start to eat away at WWE's audience.

I'm not some McMahon lapdog either, I just know that without the full support and power of Viacom behind them like WCW and the Turner juggernaut before them, TNA will just look bush league by comparison. I flip back and forth when Raw had its boring segments though, it was alright.

[Snowman]

I like them both, but in the age of the internet with both shows being found streamed live, or available to download or watch online the next day, then it really makes no difference what day it is shown.

[Chainsaw]

I got boned by DVR. Didn't record Impact, thanks to Chuck being on at the same time. Figures.

[Hanz Moleman]

I think its weird timing on TNA's part, I mean they are going against the build to Wrestlemania. Just doesn't seem like the best time to try and attract an audience to me.

[Spankymac is sick of the swiss]

Mar 15, 2010 23:27:49 GMT -5 Hanz Moleman said:

I think its weird timing on TNA's part, I mean they are going against the build to Wrestlemania. Just doesn't seem like the best time to try and attract an audience to me.

Well, ideally, it's a "high risk/high return" gambit. I mean, if they go up against the Wrestlemania build, and the audience GROWS, that's a huge feather in the cap of TNA, because then they're actively competing with WWE for fans. Of course, since they're not, it just kinda looks silly.

[barley96]

I was excited, but TNA has failed to impress me although I do prefer Impact over RAW.