|
|
Post by i.Sarita.com on Jul 16, 2010 23:58:26 GMT -5
Let's say they finally come out with a male version of the birth control pill or shot, would you be okay with taking it?
Would you take it if you were single? or only if your GF asked you to?
What if it had side effects, like weight gain or stroke in rare cases?
Would it be worth it? Personally, I'd probably take it because I hate condoms and god forbid I ever have a kid on accident, but figure with twice the amount of BC, the chances of that would be even more tiny than it is now with just the girl on stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alexander The So-so on Jul 17, 2010 0:04:33 GMT -5
Yes, yes, yes, yes, a million times yes.
I'd take it without hesitation (after it was proved to be safe and reliable, of course). That way I can be sure that I'm in control of my reproductive capabilities, no one else. Condoms can break or have holes poked in them, and just reduce comfort in general. And I'm not trusting enough to completely take a woman's claim at face value that she's on the pill, so I have nothing to worry about.
Such a pill must happen, soon. And I'd be the first in line to get it.
|
|
Perd
Patti Mayonnaise
Leslie needs to butt out for fear of receiving The Bunghole Buster
Posts: 31,997
Member is Online
|
Post by Perd on Jul 17, 2010 0:07:28 GMT -5
No, because my left hand can't get pregnant, anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Father Dougal McGuire on Jul 17, 2010 0:11:44 GMT -5
Probably not. I would be worried of tarnishing the family jewels down the line.
|
|
|
|
Post by Curt Hawkins Fan on Jul 17, 2010 0:18:44 GMT -5
Ouch.
|
|
|
|
Post by VenomFang on Jul 17, 2010 0:25:04 GMT -5
Yes absolutely. Im very paranoid about getting stds or someone pregnant so that pill would be ideal for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Father Dougal McGuire on Jul 17, 2010 0:31:28 GMT -5
Yes absolutely. Im very paranoid about getting stds or someone pregnant so that pill would be ideal for me. Would a male birth control pill stop stds? Or any birth control pill now that I think about it. |
|
|
|
Post by GuyOfOwnage on Jul 17, 2010 0:33:09 GMT -5
Maybe, if it was within the confines of a committed relationship. But for one night stands? Hell no, because in that situation, pregnancy would honestly be the least of my worries. Pills can't prevent STDs, so I'm gonna go with no.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alexander The So-so on Jul 17, 2010 0:35:55 GMT -5
Yeah, I doubt it'd do anything for STDs. So for one night stands, condoms would still be must for that purpose.
But the pill would still be totally worth it for what it would mean in terms of reproductive control.
|
|
|
|
Post by Non Banjoble Tokens on Jul 17, 2010 0:39:08 GMT -5
I think I am the male birth control.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2010 0:46:35 GMT -5
No, but then I wouldn't really term me as being sexually active. (their choice) If I were a slutbag, perhaps, but I'm lucky to get a warm smile in '10.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beets by Schrute on Jul 17, 2010 0:48:22 GMT -5
No, and why should we? They're the ones having the baby
|
|
|
|
Post by CM Crünk is teh 'CRAP! on Jul 17, 2010 0:48:29 GMT -5
No because I don't take any type of pills what so ever. The only pills I take are perscription from the doctor. Other than that, I'm all natural when it comes to making myself healthier.
|
|
H-Fist
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 6,485
|
Post by H-Fist on Jul 17, 2010 0:55:48 GMT -5
No, and why should we? They're the ones having the baby Your sperm cell, your baby. Period. It's as much yours as it is hers. And if you disagree, there are quite a few years of legal (let alone common law and religious) precedent on my side. If any individual chooses to have sexual intercourse while concurrently desiring not to conceive a child, it is his or her sole responsibility to take steps toward contraception. Men might choose a condom, or a vasectomy for more permanent means. Women have a birth control pill, the shot, female condoms, and other far more radical options. It's personal responsibility, ever and always. Lacking a commitment to personal responsibility, sex might not be a good idea. |
|
|
|
Post by i.Sarita.com on Jul 17, 2010 2:25:27 GMT -5
No because I don't take any type of pills what so ever. The only pills I take are perscription from the doctor. Other than that, I'm all natural when it comes to making myself healthier. What about a male BC shot or patch? |
|
|
|
Post by Drillbit Taylor on Jul 17, 2010 2:37:32 GMT -5
No because I would not want any long Tearm affects that could Cause problems later or when I want to have kids.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alex Shelley on Jul 17, 2010 2:43:19 GMT -5
When I was in a relationship, I suggested this to my boyfriend. His response was along the lines of "hell f***ing no". Bugs the s*** out of me.
Why should the woman be the only one in charge of that? Why should I have to pay the money and deal with the responsibility all on my own? Why should I be the one to go through annoying or potentially damaging side effects for somebody who isn't willing to do the same? Pregnancy takes two. Preventing it should take two, as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Young Game on Jul 17, 2010 2:57:28 GMT -5
STOP ALL THAT HUMPING OFF![/b]
EVERY TIME YOU HUMP, THE COMMIES WIN![/b]
(How's that for birth control?)
|
|
|
|
Post by Pervy Stone Cold on Jul 17, 2010 8:41:46 GMT -5
Sounds A LOT better than going through a vasectomy.
|
|
|
|
Post by who throws a shoe?! on Jul 17, 2010 8:52:06 GMT -5
No because I don't take any type of pills what so ever. The only pills I take are perscription from the doctor. Other than that, I'm all natural when it comes to making myself healthier. They would be on prescription from the doctor. No, and why should we? They're the ones having the baby This kind of attitude is exactly the reason why even when the male pill/injection become available women should still be on it themselves. Not wanting to stereotype, but there are a lot of guys out there with this mentality so the best thing a woman can do is take care of herself. Please note I did not say all guys  |
|
Gamertag: EKolacny
