Paul
Vegeta
Posts: 9,280
|
Post by Paul on Jul 29, 2010 8:13:37 GMT -5
There's a better chance of Jeff Jarrett going back to WWE than HBK coming to TNA. I think there's a decent chance Vince might take Jeff back if TNA folds- I mean; he did have a reasonably good second run with the company after returning from his first WCW stint. There can't still be bad blood over how Jeff left the WWE the second time; can there?
|
|
|
Post by joeiscool on Jul 29, 2010 8:28:37 GMT -5
The newz sites are still hot about the implausibility of Bryan Danielson's firing. The manufactured blowup between Shawn Michaels and Vince McMahon, where HBK was all like "How dare you fire my student and make Wrestling Observer look bad by implying it was all a work", is just fantasy. Their product is moving on, and HBK is retired. He's not coming to TNA. Yep, they're still showing HBK a lot, and Danielson will be back when his 90 days are up at the latest. They're moving forward, and perhaps HBK also asked them not to reference him that much so he can cut down on people asking him when he's coming back. The only way HBK goes to TNA is if Vince buys it, and sends HBK there as the guy announcing to the Impact Zone that Vince owns TNA. it does not make sense that he'd be back on after 90 days. 90 days is a paid vacation to basically keep heat off a wrestler, so that when/if they jump ship they are not as valuable as they once were. Why would vince pay him for 90 days and devalue him just to use him again?
|
|
|
Post by Jedi-El of Tomorrow on Jul 29, 2010 8:59:53 GMT -5
Yep, they're still showing HBK a lot, and Danielson will be back when his 90 days are up at the latest. They're moving forward, and perhaps HBK also asked them not to reference him that much so he can cut down on people asking him when he's coming back. The only way HBK goes to TNA is if Vince buys it, and sends HBK there as the guy announcing to the Impact Zone that Vince owns TNA. it does not make sense that he'd be back on after 90 days. 90 days is a paid vacation to basically keep heat off a wrestler, so that when/if they jump ship they are not as valuable as they once were. Why would vince pay him for 90 days and devalue him just to use him again? He was released due to outside pressure. From everything that's been said they didn't want to let Danielson go, and that he'd be brought back after his 90 days. Also none of Danielson's indy dates are on a Monday, or on SummerSlam. He knows he's going to be back. The guy also has Orton and Cena backing him. And if Vince didn't get outside pressure and is not going to bring Danielson back, why would he have the last image of Danielson be him spitting in Cena's face, and kicking his head in? If Vince wanted to get rid of him, and crush his heat he would have waited till after the following so they could have Cena destroy Danielson. No way in hell is Vince going to allow someone go after doing that to the top guy in the company, without Cena getting revenge.
|
|
|
Post by Arturo Classico on Jul 29, 2010 9:09:06 GMT -5
I vote no way on this. I mean he was rumored to be going to TNA since he retired in April. Sort of reminds me of 1996 when Shawn Micheals was rumored to be jumping to WCW every week to join the nWo.
|
|
Shannon Gay
Bubba Ho-Tep
WWCF Superstar, WBW Ring Announcer, and MB69RatedR on YouTube
Posts: 511
|
Post by Shannon Gay on Jul 29, 2010 9:08:02 GMT -5
If he does go to TNA, I'll LOL
They'll definitely stick HBK and NASH together, and if they were smart, they'd make BFG's main event HBK vs. Kurt Angle or HBK vs. AJ Sty YALLS.
|
|
|
Post by joeiscool on Jul 29, 2010 9:14:03 GMT -5
it does not make sense that he'd be back on after 90 days. 90 days is a paid vacation to basically keep heat off a wrestler, so that when/if they jump ship they are not as valuable as they once were. Why would vince pay him for 90 days and devalue him just to use him again? He was released due to outside pressure. From everything that's been said they didn't want to let Danielson go, and that he'd be brought back after his 90 days. Also none of Danielson's indy dates are on a Monday, or on SummerSlam. He knows he's going to be back. The guy also has Orton and Cena backing him. And if Vince didn't get outside pressure and is not going to bring Danielson back, why would he have the last image of Danielson be him spitting in Cena's face, and kicking his head in? If Vince wanted to get rid of him, and crush his heat he would have waited till after the following so they could have Cena destroy Danielson. No way in hell is Vince going to allow someone go after doing that to the top guy in the company, without Cena getting revenge. Frankly, Why would vince pay to not use him, just to use him again? It's like paying to tow your perfectly working car to a junk yard just to buy it again..
|
|
Matt Dunn
Hank Scorpio
It was inevitable.
Posts: 5,596
|
Post by Matt Dunn on Jul 29, 2010 9:16:09 GMT -5
Sonny, is that you? Inside joke, I can explain if you want.
|
|
|
Post by joeiscool on Jul 29, 2010 9:24:40 GMT -5
it does not make sense that he'd be back on after 90 days. 90 days is a paid vacation to basically keep heat off a wrestler, so that when/if they jump ship they are not as valuable as they once were. Why would vince pay him for 90 days and devalue him just to use him again? He was released due to outside pressure. From everything that's been said they didn't want to let Danielson go, and that he'd be brought back after his 90 days. Also none of Danielson's indy dates are on a Monday, or on SummerSlam. He knows he's going to be back. The guy also has Orton and Cena backing him. And if Vince didn't get outside pressure and is not going to bring Danielson back, why would he have the last image of Danielson be him spitting in Cena's face, and kicking his head in? If Vince wanted to get rid of him, and crush his heat he would have waited till after the following so they could have Cena destroy Danielson. No way in hell is Vince going to allow someone go after doing that to the top guy in the company, without Cena getting revenge. What i am saying is that he's not coming back.
|
|
|
Post by Nuke The Whales on Jul 29, 2010 10:01:33 GMT -5
Obviously true. Stop trolling and saying this is newz and not a fact.
|
|
|
Post by The poster with no name on Jul 29, 2010 10:33:58 GMT -5
TNA is not in a great state right now. I doubt Michaels wants to possibly tarnish some of his legacy by going there right now. Ric Flair did. Ric Flair is also paying off 3 ex wifes now?
|
|
ICBM
King Koopa
Didn't know we did status updates here now
Posts: 12,288
|
Post by ICBM on Jul 29, 2010 10:37:43 GMT -5
R-E-T-I-R-E-D done, finished, not wrestling anymore. This is in no way shape form or fashion a possibility
|
|
|
Post by golding on Jul 29, 2010 12:08:38 GMT -5
Perhaps HBK also asked them not to reference him that much so he can cut down on people asking him when he's coming back. This I can believe. This I do not.
|
|
|
Post by "Dashing" Dr.VonPhoenix on Jul 29, 2010 12:58:58 GMT -5
|
|
ANTLOL
Don Corleone
Posts: 1,384
|
Post by ANTLOL on Jul 29, 2010 13:13:45 GMT -5
They say he is mentally done with wrestling and Hogan is in TNA. I don't see HBK appear on TNA and I don't want him to. TNA doesn't need any more old hasbeens.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew is Good on Jul 29, 2010 13:33:59 GMT -5
I love Shawn Michaels, but again, epic failure on TNA's behalf if they went after him. It's like they have amnesia or something. They never learn that signing random over guys isn't going to help them.
|
|
SAJ Forth
Wade Wilson
Jamaican WCF Crazy!
Half Man-Half Amazing
Posts: 27,214
|
Post by SAJ Forth on Jul 29, 2010 13:45:35 GMT -5
I think he's really just not in a state to do it right now, and if so, I get the feeling he wouldn't want to damage the relationship he has with WWE. Though he could be a big acquisition.
|
|
|
Post by bowman on Jul 29, 2010 14:24:36 GMT -5
I predict a reality show for Mr. Michaels. While he may be done with wrestling, he is still very marketable to middle aged women. Just listen to the theme song he carried throughout his career. Be prepared to have your image of him ruined.
|
|
|
Post by joeverfield on Jul 29, 2010 14:49:46 GMT -5
Allow me to put my 2 cents in... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! Oooo a little pee came out
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2010 14:58:52 GMT -5
I can't believe this has gone 3 pages. This is even more ridiculous than the Macho/Steph story.
|
|
|
Post by The Summer of Muskrat XVII on Jul 29, 2010 15:55:38 GMT -5
This was posted on the WWE board a week ago, and it was a huge misquote of a WO/F4W article. What the actual article said is that HBK has made it clear to Vince that he has no intention of coming back, because of this Vince has told creative to scale back HBK references, and not use his name in storylines because he won't be returning.
There's no animosity, and he hasn't been "WWE blacklisted". Vince just doesn't want people to keep believing that HBK is coming back.
And HBK being upset/disappointed about the Danielson firing had absolutely nothing to do with the above story.
I think that's everything cleared up.
|
|