|
Post by CrazySting on Jul 4, 2010 9:51:26 GMT -5
|
|
Dave at the Movies
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
VINTAGE D-DAY DAVE! Always cranking dat thing.
Posts: 18,224
|
Post by Dave at the Movies on Jul 4, 2010 10:04:57 GMT -5
You don't know that for sure. He could be just making it up to make her look bad. This is the same guy that is trying to sue WWE for his son going crazy and committing a horrible crime. Benoit was obviously mentally disturbed so you could blame Michael Benoit just as much as WWE for the fact that he was his father. Sound ridiculous? Well so does blaming WWE in the same way.
WWE as a company may not be totally innocent, but they are not responsible for the horrendous acts caused by Chris Benoit.
|
|
|
Post by Chris the Bambikiller on Jul 4, 2010 11:10:26 GMT -5
Benoit was obviously mentally disturbed so you could blame Michael Benoit just as much as WWE for the fact that he was his father. Sound ridiculous? Well so does blaming WWE in the same way. I don't think you can blame his father, who most likely didn't see him a lot during his last years, as much as WWE which was his working environment where people could and should have kept an eye on him regarding signs of mental problems or drug abuse. But it does seem fishy that he claims all those things years after the incident, when Linda wants to go into politics. Well, two lawyers will fight over it for a few months or years, and in the end one pays a lot of money and the other one shuts up.
|
|
AriadosMan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Your friendly neighborhood superhero
Posts: 15,620
|
Post by AriadosMan on Jul 4, 2010 11:39:01 GMT -5
On one hand, it IS a form of sabotage on Linda's political career.
On the other hand, any business that causes as much collateral damage as WWE is going to get hit by this at some point. Acting like WWE is completely innocent when their work environment turned a blind eye to substance abuse for the longest time isn't an accurate representation.
|
|
|
Post by Clarence "Showstealer" Mason on Jul 4, 2010 11:49:56 GMT -5
The more I think about it, the more I don't know what to think. I mean the timing of this is suspect at best, but while I don't ever believe that the WWE are responsible for the actions of Chris Benoit, I don't think there's any doubt that his profession did play at least a factor in it.
But then I've always been in the small minority that says wrestling needs to acknowledge Chris Benoit. And before I get flamed the key word there is ACKNOWLEDGE not ACCEPT.
|
|
|
Post by dh03grad on Jul 4, 2010 12:05:20 GMT -5
You don't know that for sure. He could be just making it up to make her look bad. This is the same guy that is trying to sue WWE for his son going crazy and committing a horrible crime. Benoit was obviously mentally disturbed so you could blame Michael Benoit just as much as WWE for the fact that he was his father. Sound ridiculous? Well so does blaming WWE in the same way. WWE as a company may not be totally innocent, but they are not responsible for the horrendous acts caused by Chris Benoit. For the last year plus, Benoit was tested under the Wellness Policy and came up clean everytime while obviously being a user. Hows that?
|
|
|
Post by Piccolo on Jul 4, 2010 12:09:10 GMT -5
Benoit was obviously mentally disturbed so you could blame Michael Benoit just as much as WWE for the fact that he was his father. How so? Benoit's brain damage was of the sort that comes from repeated hard knocks to the head. Is there evidence that Michael Benoit was delivering the kinds of hard knocks to Chris Benoit's head that Chris Benoit's job was delivering?
|
|
Haulk
Samurai Cop
Posts: 2,298
|
Post by Haulk on Jul 4, 2010 12:19:56 GMT -5
Since no other wrestler has done this, how do we know it was NOT Michael delivering knocks to the head. Chris cost WWE millions in lost revenue with his stunt, they should consider suing his parents.
|
|
|
Post by Piccolo on Jul 4, 2010 12:27:49 GMT -5
Since no other wrestler has done this, how do we know it was NOT Michael delivering knocks to the head. Because we have no evidence of it, unless someone can come up with something that I haven't seen yet. We DO have documented video evidence that he received many hard knocks to the head in the course of his job duties.
|
|
|
Post by who throws a shoe?! on Jul 4, 2010 12:34:15 GMT -5
Since no other wrestler has done this, how do we know it was NOT Michael delivering knocks to the head. Chris cost WWE millions in lost revenue with his stunt, they should consider suing his parents. You're kidding, right?
|
|
|
Post by DrBackflipsHoffman on Jul 4, 2010 12:48:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by nerdinitupagain on Jul 4, 2010 13:29:45 GMT -5
#6... he's absolutely correct on. And anytime Chris is used on a DVD or shown on TV from prior footage... that also should be a paid royalty to the estate of Benoit. If WWE's argument is they aren't giving money to the murderer and feel it should go to Nancy's estate, that's irrelevant for WWE to decide. The money should be paid to the estate of who it is owed to, and the courts to sort out after that.
|
|
AriadosMan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Your friendly neighborhood superhero
Posts: 15,620
|
Post by AriadosMan on Jul 4, 2010 13:31:13 GMT -5
It would be funny if the REAL reason they didn't want Benoit footage was just because they didn't want to pay the family royalties.
|
|
Big L
Grimlock
Posts: 13,883
|
Post by Big L on Jul 4, 2010 13:32:04 GMT -5
Oh gosh not again
|
|
AriadosMan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Your friendly neighborhood superhero
Posts: 15,620
|
Post by AriadosMan on Jul 4, 2010 13:34:19 GMT -5
Seriously, this is nothing compared to the Mickie/Danielson firings in terms of neagtive reaction. Hell, Roxxi getting canned from TNA and Owen's wife got bigger negative reactions. This is easily the least trollish Benoit thread I've seen in ages.
|
|
|
Post by wcw on Jul 4, 2010 13:44:34 GMT -5
If its a royalty thing I think that Mike Beniot has a case but suing the WWE for his sons horrific actions makes no sense to me at all. As an employer WWE really isn't responsible for what Beniot did to the point of having to pay restitutions to his family.
I could imagine that Mike Beniot is just trying to sturr something up just to get some sort of hush money from the WWE.
|
|
Garee
King Koopa
I miss the old days
Posts: 11,338
|
Post by Garee on Jul 4, 2010 13:51:35 GMT -5
This is a messy situation, I'm not even going to get into it
|
|
|
Post by boomhauer20055 on Jul 4, 2010 15:51:54 GMT -5
Instead of blaming the WWE maybe he should look at himself. What kind of father raises a kid who would do such a horrible act. He is the one who did a bad job raising his kid. Vince and Lindas children seems to have turned out fine.
|
|
|
Post by dh03grad on Jul 4, 2010 15:57:59 GMT -5
Benoit was obviously mentally disturbed so you could blame Michael Benoit just as much as WWE for the fact that he was his father. How so? Benoit's brain damage was of the sort that comes from repeated hard knocks to the head. Is there evidence that Michael Benoit was delivering the kinds of hard knocks to Chris Benoit's head that Chris Benoit's job was delivering? It surely could not have been giving flying headbutts in every single match for 20 years. Oh no. Its hilarious how Vince McMahon preaches personal responsibility for everyone but himself.
|
|
|
Post by Aceorton on Jul 4, 2010 16:01:12 GMT -5
Instead of blaming the WWE maybe he should look at himself. What kind of father raises a kid who would do such a horrible act. He is the one who did a bad job raising his kid. Vince and Lindas children seems to have turned out fine.
|
|