|
Post by Citizen Zero on Jun 6, 2011 17:33:39 GMT -5
While I have Orton and HBK way up there in terms of selling, I can't deny that Bourne is the best at it. He can literally make any move look like it killed him, hence why he's the one to always be destroyed by the debuting monster hoss. Y'know, I do recall an interview with Evan Bourne that, to paraphrase, basically said that he liked being a jobber or something along those lines. And really, considering how well he sells moves like death (like Big Show's spear and the times he's taken Cross Rhodes) he'll always have a job in the WWE just because he's the best at looking like he's getting DESTROYED while still being able to pop a crowd with his offense. He's too good at losing. Only in pro-wrestling will they f*** you over for doing a good job.
|
|
|
Post by Ryback on a Pole! on Jun 6, 2011 18:00:59 GMT -5
Y'know, I do recall an interview with Evan Bourne that, to paraphrase, basically said that he liked being a jobber or something along those lines. And really, considering how well he sells moves like death (like Big Show's spear and the times he's taken Cross Rhodes) he'll always have a job in the WWE just because he's the best at looking like he's getting DESTROYED while still being able to pop a crowd with his offense. He's too good at losing. Only in pro-wrestling will they f*** you over for doing a good job. Paul Burchill had the same problem apprently. He was much better at making others look good that he was used just to put others over. It's a shame really Still, I like how Bourne's used in the WWE. He is a true underdog wrestler since even though he loses 70% of the time he still occasionly picks up a big win over a main eventer like how he beat Swagger the other week and holds pins over guys like Sheamus and Jericho
|
|