|
|
Post by DiBiase is Good on Dec 31, 2012 13:28:37 GMT -5
and is also the first film ever to gross £100 million in the UK.
Pretty impressive considering all the troubles it had with the MGM bankruptcy.
I thought it would be a big hit but never thought it would ever gross this much. Thoroughly deserved as it maybe my film of the year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr PONYMANIA Mr Jenzie on Dec 31, 2012 16:19:34 GMT -5
and i've only went to see it TWICE!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2012 17:27:00 GMT -5
It's also at $289mil here in the US.............which is currently $3mil more than Twilight: The Last One. (And it will probably remain ahead of Twilight too...) ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by paulbearer on Jan 1, 2013 6:19:46 GMT -5
GF held the box office record in France since '65 , almost 50 (!!!) yrs before SF came along  TSWLM and MR were also huge world wide (110 mill and a whopping 202 mill , insane money back then)......MR held the record until GE. |
|
543Y2J
Patti Mayonnaise
Seventh level .gif Master
Posts: 38,794
|
Post by 543Y2J on Jan 1, 2013 7:07:14 GMT -5
Incredibly happy about this, I hope they are bringing Mendes back for the next one as well. Kind of off topic but I really hope Roger Deakins gets the Cinematography Oscar for this movie, he deserves it every scene is beuatiful and is one of the greatest looking films of all time imo.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2013 8:45:33 GMT -5
And that's with me not going to see it as well Can't wait till the blu-ray comes out so I can see what has most people hyped up  |
|
|
|
Post by Rumble McSkirmish on Jan 1, 2013 8:52:36 GMT -5
As much I hate to say it, maybe there should be a 4-5 year break in between Bond films as we tend to get the more quality movies out of the hiatus. (IE: Goldeneye, Casino Royal and now Skyfall.)
|
|
Lupin the Third
Patti Mayonnaise
I'm sorry.....I love you. *boot to the head*--3rd most culpable in the jixing of NXT, D'oh!
Join the Dark Order....
Posts: 36,318
|
Post by Lupin the Third on Jan 1, 2013 12:52:43 GMT -5
As much I hate to say it, maybe there should be a 4-5 year break in between Bond films as we tend to get the more quality movies out of the hiatus. (IE: Goldeneye, Casino Royal and now Skyfall.) I agree with this. It gives them time to play out the movie and get it right, rather than rush it to theaters and get a horrible product. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2013 12:58:12 GMT -5
As much I hate to say it, maybe there should be a 4-5 year break in between Bond films as we tend to get the more quality movies out of the hiatus. (IE: Goldeneye, Casino Royal and now Skyfall.) Hasn't Bond 24 already been announced for 2014? |
|
|
|
Post by willywonka666 on Jan 1, 2013 13:23:18 GMT -5
Hmm they could have split that one in half with the running time and made even more
|
|
|
|
Post by Bravo Echo November on Jan 2, 2013 14:07:41 GMT -5
And it deserves every penny. Although I have to say, they are going to have a difficult time trying to top it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2013 15:58:30 GMT -5
As much I hate to say it, maybe there should be a 4-5 year break in between Bond films as we tend to get the more quality movies out of the hiatus. (IE: Goldeneye, Casino Royal and now Skyfall.) They seem to use that kind of gap between different Bond actors instead of movies. IIRC, there have been 25 Bond films in 50 years. Which means an average of 2 per year. Which is something since I'm certain there was quite a gap between Dalton & Bronson and Bronson & Craig. Which brings the average down to less than 2 years between. That's amazing (unless my math is wrong - which is quite probable). |
|
|
|
Post by G✇JI☈A on Jan 2, 2013 18:21:37 GMT -5
I think they are making another Austin Powers movie. So I'm guessing they would want to gross:
One Million Dollors!
Oh god I hope it's not a hit... Cause if it is.. The producers would want Bond to go sort of silly like in the mid to late 90s.
|
|
|
|
Post by DSR on Jan 2, 2013 22:20:34 GMT -5
As much I hate to say it, maybe there should be a 4-5 year break in between Bond films as we tend to get the more quality movies out of the hiatus. (IE: Goldeneye, Casino Royal and now Skyfall.) They seem to use that kind of gap between different Bond actors instead of movies. IIRC, there have been 25 Bond films in 50 years. Which means an average of 2 per year. Which is something since I'm certain there was quite a gap between Dalton & Bronson and Bronson & Craig. Which brings the average down to less than 2 years between. That's amazing (unless my math is wrong - which is quite probable). There've been 23, unless you're counting the comedic Casino Royale and Never Say Never Again. |
|
|
|
Post by Evilution E5150 on Jan 2, 2013 22:35:05 GMT -5
eh still not gonna go see it
|
|
