Perd
Patti Mayonnaise
Leslie needs to butt out for fear of receiving The Bunghole Buster
Posts: 31,999
Member is Online
|
Post by Perd on Jul 21, 2015 15:16:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by TWERKIN' MAGGLE on Jul 21, 2015 15:19:43 GMT -5
Yup.
John Cena's a f***ing prick. Every day he's in the business is a day things get a little bit worse.
|
|
|
Post by 1 Free Moon-Down with Burger on Jul 21, 2015 15:21:07 GMT -5
Here we go again.
A wrestler is moving down after feuding with the tippy top guy. I doubt he's gonna be feuding with Fandango next. Was he supposed to somehow go somewhere ABOVE the top? He ain't gonna feud with Lesnar or Taker in his second main roster feud.
|
|
|
Post by Jacy Jayne Atomic Dog AMV on Jul 21, 2015 15:23:05 GMT -5
I'm feeling very strong in defeat right now.
|
|
|
Post by TWERKIN' MAGGLE on Jul 21, 2015 15:23:27 GMT -5
I'm feeling very strong in defeat right now. Are you the Roman Reigns of defeat?
|
|
|
Post by Jacy Jayne Atomic Dog AMV on Jul 21, 2015 15:27:45 GMT -5
I'm feeling very strong in defeat right now. Are you the Roman Reigns of defeat? OOOAAAAA
|
|
Perd
Patti Mayonnaise
Leslie needs to butt out for fear of receiving The Bunghole Buster
Posts: 31,999
Member is Online
|
Post by Perd on Jul 21, 2015 15:29:18 GMT -5
That Rusev/Owens dance-off is going to be something. I bet Vince laughs so hard he shits his pants.
But seriously, I ain't panicking, yet. I'll do that when he wins the IC title.
|
|
|
Post by britstap on Jul 21, 2015 15:31:11 GMT -5
I'm just gonna wait to see what he's doing at Summerslam, the 2nd biggest PPV of the year at least before I declare him damaged goods.
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Jul 21, 2015 15:31:31 GMT -5
Even if Owens beat Cena, he'd still take a step down. And it's not going to hurt him that badly. This is the guy who made a feud with Alex Riley interesting.
|
|
|
Post by Mayonnaise on Jul 21, 2015 15:34:32 GMT -5
Here we go again. A wrestler is moving down after feuding with the tippy top guy. I doubt he's gonna be feuding with Fandango next. Was he supposed to somehow go somewhere ABOVE the top? He ain't gonna feud with Lesnar or Taker in his second main roster feud. Why does he have to move at all? Why not put him at a top level and have him stay there instead of yo-yo'ing him? You know, have a fresh top heel so it isn't Rollins-Wyatt-start over for guys like Ambrose, Reigns, and while we're at it a new face to throw in that mix as well. This isn't even getting into the supposed reasoning behind it either.
|
|
Burst
El Dandy
*inarticulate squawking*
Posts: 8,599
Member is Online
|
Post by Burst on Jul 21, 2015 15:37:15 GMT -5
Whether this is true or not, I have absolutely no clue why it's so damn hard to book multiple people at an equal "power level" if you will nowadays.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2015 15:38:00 GMT -5
Here we go again. A wrestler is moving down after feuding with the tippy top guy. I doubt he's gonna be feuding with Fandango next. Was he supposed to somehow go somewhere ABOVE the top? He ain't gonna feud with Lesnar or Taker in his second main roster feud. Why does he have to move at all? Why not put him at a top level and have him stay there instead of yo-yo'ing him? You know, have a fresh top heel so it isn't Rollins-Wyatt-start over for guys like Ambrose, Reigns, and while we're at it a new face to throw in that mix as well. This isn't even getting into the supposed reasoning behind it either. Because..... the IWC is always whining and stuff.
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Jul 21, 2015 15:38:44 GMT -5
Here we go again. A wrestler is moving down after feuding with the tippy top guy. I doubt he's gonna be feuding with Fandango next. Was he supposed to somehow go somewhere ABOVE the top? He ain't gonna feud with Lesnar or Taker in his second main roster feud. Why does he have to move at all? Why not put him at a top level and have him stay there instead of yo-yo'ing him? You know, have a fresh top heel so it isn't Rollins-Wyatt-start over for guys like Ambrose, Reigns, and while we're at it a new face to throw in that mix as well. This isn't even getting into the supposed reasoning behind it either. He shouldn't move. But if you throw Reigns at Owens, then to most fans it either looks like you're sacrificing Reigns so that Owens can "get his heat back" or sacrificing Owens to "make Roman look really strong".
|
|
|
Post by Confused Mark Wahlberg on Jul 21, 2015 15:38:57 GMT -5
"Well he's movin' on down, to the lower card, to a deluxe apartment with Barr-ett, well he's movin' on down..."
|
|
|
Post by Magic knows Black Lives Matter on Jul 21, 2015 15:39:50 GMT -5
That's why I'm not a big fan of Alvarez. When he has an agenda, he'll say whatever to get his point across..
"He was put there with the rest of the lower-card guys"
As in 90-95% of the active roster , you geek. The duck kind of analysis is that? If Dave wasn't on the site, I wouldn't even f*** with him period. A worker in almost every sense.
|
|
|
Post by Alyce: Old Media Enthusiast on Jul 21, 2015 15:39:44 GMT -5
Stuff like this really makes it harder for me to care for this product anymore
|
|
|
Post by Mayonnaise on Jul 21, 2015 15:40:16 GMT -5
Why does he have to move at all? Why not put him at a top level and have him stay there instead of yo-yo'ing him? You know, have a fresh top heel so it isn't Rollins-Wyatt-start over for guys like Ambrose, Reigns, and while we're at it a new face to throw in that mix as well. This isn't even getting into the supposed reasoning behind it either. He shouldn't move. But if you throw Reigns at Owens, then to most fans it either looks like you're sacrificing Reigns so that Owens can "get his heat back" or sacrificing Owens to "make Roman look really strong". If you book things right, that doesn't happen. It is possible to look good without making someone else look bad.
|
|
|
Post by madness50 on Jul 21, 2015 15:40:38 GMT -5
I despise this philosophy that only a couple of guys can be in the main event or upper midcard.
|
|
|
Post by 1 Free Moon-Down with Burger on Jul 21, 2015 15:42:40 GMT -5
Here we go again. A wrestler is moving down after feuding with the tippy top guy. I doubt he's gonna be feuding with Fandango next. Was he supposed to somehow go somewhere ABOVE the top? He ain't gonna feud with Lesnar or Taker in his second main roster feud. Why does he have to move at all? Why not put him at a top level and have him stay there instead of yo-yo'ing him? You know, have a fresh top heel so it isn't Rollins-Wyatt-start over for guys like Ambrose, Reigns, and while we're at it a new face to throw in that mix as well. This isn't even getting into the supposed reasoning behind it either. But what is staying in the same slot? Feuding with other main event talent? We don't even know what he's doing yet. It only seems like he's being 'shoved down the card' because he's not feuding with Cena at the moment. We know nothing at this point in time. Again. He's not out there picking a fight with Zack Ryder. He could easily be slotted into a feud with Sheamus judging by the end of the show last night and turn face. Who knows!
|
|
kidglov3s
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wants her Shot
Who is Tiger Maskooo?
Posts: 15,870
|
Post by kidglov3s on Jul 21, 2015 15:43:30 GMT -5
That's why I'm not a big fan of Alvarez. When he has an agenda, he'll say whatever to get his point across.. "He was put there with the rest of the lower-card guys" As in 90-95% of the active roster , you geek. The duck kind of analysis is that? If Dave wasn't on the site, I wouldn't even f*** with him period. A worker in almost every sense. On WOR Dave was as much about pointing that out and what it meant as Bryan was. And it's a reasonable point, if you were in that brawl it says something about where you are in the pecking order.
|
|