We're getting Cena vs Roman at WM arent we?

[wildojinx]

It seems so obvious, Cena returns in time for the Rumble to beat Sheamus for the belt, they try to get Roman over as the rumble winner again, then we get Roman vs Cena at WM with Reigns winning the belt. Not sure how i feel about that honestly.

[radiantsilvergun]

Nah. That Roman vs Dean match pretty much felt like a teaser trailer for a future match between the two. I'm thinking at Mania.

[Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-]]

If you want the Internet to commit suicide now then sure.

[Sparkybob]

John is probably due a spotlight match after his last 2 mania mid card matches, but I imagine it's against like Taker.

[Ruthless Pessimism]

Should make for an awesome match that ends with Cena putting the younger star over on the big stage. Just like everyone wants.

[Deleted]

Yup. Reigns gets screwed in his rematch with Sheamus and goes off into a feud with Triple H where he wins the Rumble, while at the Rumble Cena wins the title from Sheamus and they do the big passing of the torch thing at Mania while the crowd shits on it.

[Deleted]

I'll take it. I don't want Reigns vs. Triple H, I know that.

[Lancers]

I actually am afraid that Sheamus/Reigns is being held off to Wrestlemania.

Reigns gets screwed at TLC
Wins Rumble again
Wins at WM in the co-main because....Brock v. Rock or Taker's final match

[Matt]

I'm thinking Triple H wins the Rumble and Reigns beat Sheamus. So Reigns vs. Triple H and Cena vs. Undertaker.

[lmagicdancer1]

*Looks at following link:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=9I8brc0cqaw

*throws up arms in defeat and shakes head*

Why? WWE Why?

[Deleted]

Nov 22, 2015 23:20:31 GMT -5 Lancers said:

I actually am afraid that Sheamus/Reigns is being held off to Wrestlemania.

Reigns gets screwed at TLC
Wins Rumble again
Wins at WM in the co-main because....Brock v. Rock or Taker's final match

Supposedly Rock's schedule now won't allow for him to even appear at Mania, much less wrestle.

[Vice honcho room temperature]

Would the universe collapse in on itself in how the 100k smarks react to that match up?

[Deleted]

Nov 22, 2015 23:04:00 GMT -5 Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-] said:

If you want the Internet to commit suicide now then sure.

Hey I'm on the internet and I choose not to kill myself, is that kosh?

[Mayonnaise]

Dean/Roman (Dean wins the title at the Rumble, Roman wins the Rumble and then beats Triple H at February PPV)
Cena/Taker

[Deleted]

The big unknowns I'm seeing in all of this really are Lesnar and Triple H. In terms of names you need to fit on the Mania card there's Cena, Reigns, Triple H, Lesnar, and Taker; problem with that is absolutely nobody wants to see those two against each other again, and Lesnar's basically faced everyone there is to face at this point that's on his level, except Orton who's most likely missing Mania. Triple H has much the same problem, outside of facing Reigns.

Granted I have this suspicion, especially in light of them talking up how completely unstoppable Brock is at Hell in a Cell after he won, they might do a thing where Lesnar wins the Rumble leading up to Reigns properly beating him this time around. Which is up there with Rock / Cena 2 in terms of, "God I don't caaaaaare," and, "There's no chance there's anything but one particular result here," and putting him up against Brock again is exactly the wrong thing to do to make Reigns hit the next level in the eyes of the fans.

[rnrk supports BLM]

Undertaker vs. Cena
Triple H vs. Reigns
Lesnar vs. Sheamus (for the title)

[Deleted]

Nov 23, 2015 1:41:15 GMT -5 rnrk supports BLM said:

Undertaker vs. Cena
Triple H vs. Reigns
Lesnar vs. Sheamus (for the title)

There's no chance they're trusting Sheamus with the belt to Mania, having him beat Lesnar, or having Brock win it again.

[thelonewolf527]

Nov 23, 2015 1:34:24 GMT -5 Lizuka #BLM said:

The big unknowns I'm seeing in all of this really are Lesnar and Triple H. In terms of names you need to fit on the Mania card there's Cena, Reigns, Triple H, Lesnar, and Taker; problem with that is absolutely nobody wants to see those two against each other again, and Lesnar's basically faced everyone there is to face at this point that's on his level, except Orton who's most likely missing Mania. Triple H has much the same problem, outside of facing Reigns.

Granted I have this suspicion, especially in light of them talking up how completely unstoppable Brock is at Hell in a Cell after he won, they might do a thing where Lesnar wins the Rumble leading up to Reigns properly beating him this time around. Which is up there with Rock / Cena 2 in terms of, "God I don't caaaaaare," and, "There's no chance there's anything but one particular result here," and putting him up against Brock again is exactly the wrong thing to do to make Reigns hit the next level in the eyes of the fans.

I completely disagree about there being no point to Reigns vs. Lesnar. You have the easy story of Brock was never beaten for the title and the two still have unfinished business considering their one on one match last year had no real conclusion to it. Reigns has to beat Lesnar to prove that his title reign is real and not fake.

[siredger]

Sheamus isn't making it past the Royal Rumble as WWE Champion. You don't take the one man people don't care about even less than Roman Reigns and giving him the uberlong title reign.

[Deleted]

Nov 23, 2015 1:47:43 GMT -5 thelonewolf527 said:

Nov 23, 2015 1:34:24 GMT -5 Lizuka #BLM said:

The big unknowns I'm seeing in all of this really are Lesnar and Triple H. In terms of names you need to fit on the Mania card there's Cena, Reigns, Triple H, Lesnar, and Taker; problem with that is absolutely nobody wants to see those two against each other again, and Lesnar's basically faced everyone there is to face at this point that's on his level, except Orton who's most likely missing Mania. Triple H has much the same problem, outside of facing Reigns.

Granted I have this suspicion, especially in light of them talking up how completely unstoppable Brock is at Hell in a Cell after he won, they might do a thing where Lesnar wins the Rumble leading up to Reigns properly beating him this time around. Which is up there with Rock / Cena 2 in terms of, "God I don't caaaaaare," and, "There's no chance there's anything but one particular result here," and putting him up against Brock again is exactly the wrong thing to do to make Reigns hit the next level in the eyes of the fans.

I completely disagree about there being no point to Reigns vs. Lesnar. You have the easy story of Brock was never beaten for the title and the two still have unfinished business considering their one on one match last year had no real conclusion to it. Reigns has to beat Lesnar to prove that his title reign is real and not fake.

I just don't see why anyone would especially care. Plus Lesnar's around for at least two more years afterward with no clear direction or purpose from there and the big loss having already been done, and all beating Lesnar would do is just set up people going back to the cries of how invincible Reigns is and probably cause the crowd to go from, "Kind of booing him in spots," back to, "Kill that bastard." It's just more trouble than it's worth, at least right now; if you did it at Mania 33, maybe by then it'd work, but I see zero benefit for 32.