|
Post by Instant Classic on Jan 24, 2016 23:04:03 GMT -5
I ain't mad, I always said I wanted Triple H to win it one more time. Damn did they get my hopes up though thinking Ambrose would win...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2016 23:04:06 GMT -5
Not that bothered by it because I had no reason to expect anything different. Granted, did nothing to make me want to start watching Raw again or to watch Mania.
I'm open to the idea of Triple H as champion even, just have absolutely zero interest in him vs. Reigns at Mania for the title.
|
|
jemtruman
ALF
Chances are, I stole it from the tumbles.
Posts: 1,238
|
Post by jemtruman on Jan 24, 2016 23:04:09 GMT -5
So are we going with HHH vs Reigns, with the Rock in the corner or as ref, rematch at WrestleMania, or HHH vs the Rock at WrestleMania?
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 121,204
Member is Online
|
Post by Mozenrath on Jan 24, 2016 23:04:16 GMT -5
I don't really mind it.
Roman vs Triple H is a match that has literally been building for years, given Evolution vs Roman. It was going to happen eventually, and at least it has stakes.
That said, I get people being upset about it, even if I don't overly mind. Triple H got the title in an unfair fashion, Roman lost the odds so we might be spared from a few nanoseconds of whining from people, and the world kept spinning.
|
|
|
Post by TheMediocreWarrior on Jan 24, 2016 23:04:28 GMT -5
I'm fine with it. It's going to be a short reign.
Of course, he should face Ambrose at Mania and not Reigns. Ambrose is the one who came out of that show looking like a million bucks, while Reigns got booed the whole time.
|
|
Sparkybob
King Koopa
I have a status?
Posts: 10,993
|
Post by Sparkybob on Jan 24, 2016 23:04:40 GMT -5
The owner Hunter, trusts the booker HHH, that the wrestler Triple H is the best choice to be world champion. Don't see the conflict here.
|
|
|
Post by Mighty Attack Tribble on Jan 24, 2016 23:04:49 GMT -5
I'm perfectly fine with it. I don't dislike Roman at all, but I'd rather have HHH as champion over him.
|
|
|
Post by MrElijah on Jan 24, 2016 23:04:55 GMT -5
YES! Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes! HE DID IT!! I told you humanoids!!
|
|
Shai
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 6,507
|
Post by Shai on Jan 24, 2016 23:05:21 GMT -5
The part of me that used to be a Triple H fangirl is squeezing the rest of me is pissed
|
|
|
Post by Big Bad Kahuna on Jan 24, 2016 23:05:22 GMT -5
That rumble was fun enough that I don't mind the result. Also, anyone but Reigns. Yeah AJ and Sami were in it, we good
|
|
FAR5222
El Dandy
Counted 237 Bros. SWERVE Got no cookie for it.
Posts: 7,889
|
Post by FAR5222 on Jan 24, 2016 23:05:42 GMT -5
I really don't care. But it sure is funny that it happened. Hey at least WWE can force feed this crap to the casual fans who like Reigns while everyone else boos him or is apathetic.
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Jan 24, 2016 23:05:42 GMT -5
It is 2016.`
|
|
BRV
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wants him some Taco Flavored Kisses.
Posts: 17,012
|
Post by BRV on Jan 24, 2016 23:05:43 GMT -5
I'd be totally fine with a Triple H WWE World Heavyweight Championship run leading into a big WrestleMania main event, provided it were against a face character that I and the fans desperately wanted to see topple him. Think Daniel Bryan in the lead to WreslteMania XXX. But with two-time world champion Roman Reigns chasing him and leading to a Reigns versus Triple H WrestleMania match? No thank you.
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 121,204
Member is Online
|
Post by Mozenrath on Jan 24, 2016 23:05:50 GMT -5
The owner Hunter, trusts the booker HHH, that the wrestler Triple H is the best choice to be world champion. Don't see the conflict here. Verne Gagne, Dory Funk Sr., and Fritz Von Erich must be rolling in their graves. They'd never stand for that sort of thing.
|
|
cool
Samurai Cop
Posts: 2,195
|
Post by cool on Jan 24, 2016 23:05:53 GMT -5
Could be worse, could be Alberto Del Rio.
|
|
|
Post by kingoftheindies on Jan 24, 2016 23:06:06 GMT -5
With all the injuries, and Sheamus just not getting heat as a foil to Reigns, I get why they went with Hunter. BUT I don't think Hunter needs the belt.
The WWE is too focused on creating Mania Moments and they want Reigns to be a conquering hero against a heel. Why not just have the Authority screw Roman out of the title and just have him go 1 on 1 with Hunter at Mania in a match without the title? Have Brock/Bray be for the title.
|
|
TWERKIN' MAGGLE
Crow T. Robot
Black Lives Matter
Posts: 46,396
Member is Online
|
Post by TWERKIN' MAGGLE on Jan 24, 2016 23:06:02 GMT -5
Anyone who was trying to convince us that it wasn't happening had to be trying to convince themselves at the same time, yes?
|
|
|
Post by JTG Fan on Jan 24, 2016 23:06:09 GMT -5
Amazing how they did it the way where it makes Triple H look like a cool conquering badass babyface by entering #30 and winning cleanly and not having him be entrant #31 who uses a sledgehammer with evil intent to screw over the top babyface in the company.
And by 'amazing' I mean incredibly predictable and stupid.
|
|
Mochi Lone Wolf
Fry's dog Seymour
Development through Destruction.
Posts: 24,047
|
Post by Mochi Lone Wolf on Jan 24, 2016 23:06:22 GMT -5
The one story I didn't want to see was watching HHH become the conquering heel, only for him to give the win and the title back to Roman at Wrestlemania.
Yet, that's what I'm getting. At least the rest of the match was good I guess.
|
|
|
Post by bearned on Jan 24, 2016 23:06:29 GMT -5
They surely have to have noticed Reigns got booed out the building fighting HHH and Ambrose got a massive pop. Maybe that will build to something...
|
|