Sephiroth
Wade Wilson
Surviving
Posts: 28,961
Member is Online
|
Post by Sephiroth on Jan 20, 2017 13:06:32 GMT -5
This may be the first "worst sequels" list I've ever seen not to include Exorcist II: The Heretic. In fact, with the exception of his bandwagon #1 choice, there's no horror to be found on either the list or honoraries, and those traditionally produce the worst sequels to well-received originals. Also, no Star Trek V Or Amityville 4... AKA The Evil Lamp movie. Gingerdead man vs Evil Bong
|
|
SAJ Forth
Wade Wilson
Jamaican WCF Crazy!
Half Man-Half Amazing
Posts: 27,214
|
Post by SAJ Forth on Jan 20, 2017 13:19:29 GMT -5
Any one of the one we name would be better on this list than #1.
|
|
|
Post by Mr PONYMANIA Mr Jenzie on Jan 20, 2017 18:53:46 GMT -5
terminator genysis is my THIRD best terminator movie, and is an excellent movie imo so no
also no to the transformer or PotC sequels
|
|
|
Post by Joe Neglia on Jan 21, 2017 0:25:00 GMT -5
Or how about any of the three billion direct-to-video sequels that have become a staple of home video over the last two decades, usually starring TV actors and are generally retreads of the original with new characters.
|
|
Jiren
Patti Mayonnaise
Hearts Bayformers
Posts: 35,163
|
Post by Jiren on Jan 21, 2017 7:37:15 GMT -5
I'll add "Sinister 2"
The first was a genuinely unsettling horror movie with a damn good ending, 2 was just shit
|
|
Glitch
King Koopa
Not Going To Die; Childs, we're goin' out to give Blair the test. If he tries to make it back here and we're not with him... burn him.
Watching you.
Posts: 12,717
|
Post by Glitch on Jan 21, 2017 8:06:23 GMT -5
I gotta admit, I laughed at the crying guy between the films.
|
|
|
Post by eJm on Jan 21, 2017 8:17:05 GMT -5
Or how about any of the three billion direct-to-video sequels that have become a staple of home video over the last two decades, usually starring TV actors and are generally retreads of the original with new characters. Pfft, why would we actually want people to consider that those movies are worse that most blockbusters, even though they are, when it's easier to just call blockbusters the worst things ever?
|
|
|
Post by Red Impact on Jan 21, 2017 11:24:50 GMT -5
Or how about any of the three billion direct-to-video sequels that have become a staple of home video over the last two decades, usually starring TV actors and are generally retreads of the original with new characters. Pfft, why would we actually want people to consider that those movies are worse that most blockbusters, even though they are, when it's easier to just call blockbusters the worst things ever? I can see why they would focus on theatrical releases over direct to video/TV movie. Theatrical releases actually are supposed to have a decent budget and expectations behind them, with a studio's actual support, whereas direct to video movies tend to be cheap cash-ins that don't have any actual expectations behind them and a mere fraction of the resources. It'd be like compiling a list of under-performing athletes and filling it with peewee soccer players and little league pitchers because they're not as good as anyone in the major leagues.
|
|
Shai
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 6,507
|
Post by Shai on Jan 21, 2017 11:33:10 GMT -5
Some of these he can kiss my ass on.
I f***ing have NEVER seen anyone say Clerks 2 sucked. Me personally I loved it.
Age of Extinction was not as bad as most people say it had issues but to me it's the best one after the first.
|
|
Jiren
Patti Mayonnaise
Hearts Bayformers
Posts: 35,163
|
Post by Jiren on Jan 21, 2017 11:55:03 GMT -5
Some of these he can kiss my ass on. I f***ing have NEVER seen anyone say Clerks 2 sucked. Me personally I loved it. Age of Extinction was not as bad as most people say it had issues but to me it's the best one after the first. AOE wasn't bad, It should've been 45mins to 1 hour shorter though. At a certain point I thought it was at the climax only to look at my watch and realize it's only half way through.
|
|