Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2017 19:49:52 GMT -5
AVP Requiem. A major crossover movie between two big franchises and somehow everything about it including the effects make it seem like a B movie.
|
|
|
|
Post by DASH 243✅ on Jan 21, 2017 19:50:12 GMT -5
The Rock in The Mummy Returns. that was the first thing i thought of. |
|
Push R Truth
Patti Mayonnaise
Unique and Special Snowflake, and a pants-less heathen.
Perpetually Constipated
Posts: 39,372
|
Post by Push R Truth on Jan 21, 2017 20:11:59 GMT -5
Seriously, I fully believe the Rock in Mummy Returns would have looked better if it was just 100% claymation/stopmotion
|
|
BorneAgain
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,495
Member is Online
|
Post by BorneAgain on Jan 21, 2017 20:13:54 GMT -5
I generally like the Hobbit films more than the consensus does, but even as a fan the limitations of pure CGI in it vs. the more convincing CGI/models/location shooting LOTR used started becoming obvious in Battle of the Five Armies.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sir Woodrow on Jan 21, 2017 20:50:32 GMT -5
Seriously, I fully believe the Rock in Mummy Returns would have looked better if it was just 100% claymation/stopmotion I thought it was |
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave is Correct on Jan 21, 2017 22:07:36 GMT -5
Considering the movie was sold on it's visuals... Avatar had some really terrible effects. Most of the Landscapes were beautiful.. but I found like every creature to be really poorly rendered. Desolation of Smaug had some terrible effects.... probably some of the worst effects I've ever seen in a major motion picture. edit: I generally like the Hobbit films more than the consensus does, but even as a fan the limitations of pure CGI in it vs. the more convincing CGI/models/location shooting LOTR used started becoming obvious in Battle of the Five Armies. It was damned obvious at points in Smaug... I mean this entire scene None of that looks good. |
|
|
|
Post by Baldobomb-22-OH-MAN!!! on Jan 21, 2017 22:18:31 GMT -5
Oh wow, I tried to forget about that. we saw it in the theater and my wife and I turned to each other and laughed hysterically I remember the Scorpion King stuff at the end being hilariously bad but I don't recall the film as a whole being that bad. Then again, I haven't seen it in years. in all honesty the rest of the movie looked pretty good which just made the comical toon-Rock face all the more cringeworthy. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2017 0:24:35 GMT -5
Jurassic World and Independence Day: Resurgence some how look worse then the originals..
|
|
|
|
Post by bibboid on Jan 22, 2017 1:38:42 GMT -5
The Last Starfighter was a great 80's sci-fi movie with cutting edge effects......that looked like absolute crap at the time and even worse now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Snips on Jan 22, 2017 12:55:41 GMT -5
The Hobbit looks like the SyFy knockoff of The Lord of the Rings
|
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Jan 22, 2017 13:00:58 GMT -5
Blade 2 has a terrible fight scene between Blade and that girl vampire.
|
|
|
|
Post by xCompackx on Jan 22, 2017 13:05:13 GMT -5
AVP Requiem. A major crossover movie between two big franchises and somehow everything about it including the effects make it seem like a B movie. AVP Requiem looked so dark, I'm amazed you could even see the special effects. |
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Jan 22, 2017 13:06:47 GMT -5
That demon baby in Twilight when it claims Jacob's soul
|
|
Feyrhausen
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 6,335
Member is Online
|
Post by Feyrhausen on Jan 22, 2017 14:29:04 GMT -5
Escape from LA. I know 50 million is not much, even in 1996 but considering Jurassic Park was three years earlier with only 63 million they could have done a lot better.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2017 14:42:58 GMT -5
AVP Requiem. A major crossover movie between two big franchises and somehow everything about it including the effects make it seem like a B movie. AVP Requiem looked so dark, I'm amazed you could even see the special effects. yeah. I've mentioned before on here that I think it's visually the darkest movie ever made. You can't even see what is happening unless you have the room completely dark when you watch it. |
|
|
|
Post by Mighty Attack Tribble on Jan 22, 2017 17:04:17 GMT -5
Escape from LA. I know 50 million is not much, even in 1996 but considering Jurassic Park was three years earlier with only 63 million they could have done a lot better. That submarine sequence and Pam Grier and her gang getting flash fried in the back of the chopper are particularly bad. |
|
|
|
Post by Azrael from Outerspace on Jan 22, 2017 17:24:39 GMT -5
I recently watched the second Fantastic Four movie. Every time Richards is on screen I cringe. I'm not sure if it's impossible to do stretch effects well but they failed. Really most of the CGI isn't very good but that takes the cake. I did like the Silver Surfer though for the most part.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Thread Barbi on Jan 22, 2017 17:33:43 GMT -5
With the exception of the first one, the entirety of the Transformers franchise.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Jan 22, 2017 17:41:19 GMT -5
Jabba in Star Wars: Special Edition, especially the bit where Han steps on his tail.
|
|
Dub H
Crow T. Robot
Captain Pixel: the Game Master
I ❤ Aniki
Posts: 48,517
Member is Online
|
Post by Dub H on Jan 22, 2017 18:07:51 GMT -5
Both of the Hulk movies, both look bad. I mean I don't know how a gamma powered poodle should look but I'm sure it should look better than that! For the last hulk movie,from what i got from interviews is that all the CGI effect went to making the Hulk/ Aberration ,which apparently is pretty hard to do well and takes a lot since he is a lot of time in the screen as a Hulk |
|
