|
Post by Ryushinku on Dec 16, 2018 5:50:11 GMT -5
No-one gave a damn all the times (and it was pretty often) when SmackDown! won these things, so, not giving a damn when Raw won it is pretty consistent apathy at least.
|
|
Cronant
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 17,556
|
Post by Cronant on Dec 16, 2018 17:08:19 GMT -5
It can't be 4-3 every year
|
|
SAJ Forth
Wade Wilson
Jamaican WCF Crazy!
Half Man-Half Amazing
Posts: 27,214
|
Post by SAJ Forth on Dec 16, 2018 17:16:03 GMT -5
Why did RadioShack ask for you phone number when you bought batteries
|
|
|
Post by eJm on Dec 16, 2018 17:26:27 GMT -5
Why did RadioShack ask for you phone number when you bought batteries ...WWE wants to send Smackdown spam texts?
|
|
|
Post by facethatrunstheplace on Dec 16, 2018 17:36:33 GMT -5
Sometimes you have to throw out a shock result to keep things unpredictable. Like a 2/3 falls match ending 2-0. A shock result can work, but even those should serve a purpose beyond "anything can happen". Plus, this was, what, 7 matches? Not a one-off thing, it's just too much. It was only six losses for Smackdown at survivor series. But they apparently we're going to lose all 7 matches.
|
|
|
Post by HMARK Center on Dec 16, 2018 18:42:45 GMT -5
It can't be 4-3 every year Which is fine, but shouldn't there be a purpose behind however they choose to book it? Whether the ending is 4-3 or 7-0, there should be a follow-up to the narrative in mind.
|
|
|
Post by facethatrunstheplace on Dec 16, 2018 19:00:49 GMT -5
It can't be 4-3 every year Which is fine, but shouldn't there be a purpose behind however they choose to book it? Whether the ending is 4-3 or 7-0, there should be a follow-up to the narrative in mind. True there's also the fact that Raw has had more wins than Smackdown at the last three survivor series PPV's.
|
|
|
Post by romanstylesiii on Dec 16, 2018 19:12:12 GMT -5
Vince McMahon loves Raw. I'm not joking; that's it.
|
|