ToyfareMark
Vegeta
A WINNER IS YOU!
In Hutch I trust!
Posts: 9,626 
|
Post by ToyfareMark on Aug 29, 2020 13:42:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by CMPunkyBrewster on Aug 29, 2020 13:55:56 GMT -5
The only thing she did wrong was mislead people with the sale of nudes that weren't.
It's not her fault that people were willing to pay her what she asked.
|
|
ToyfareMark
Vegeta
A WINNER IS YOU!
In Hutch I trust!
Posts: 9,626
|
Post by ToyfareMark on Aug 29, 2020 14:02:18 GMT -5
Honestly its hard for me to be sympathetic. I guess its because the thought of paying to see someone naked is laughable when I can easily do that for free. So they all seem like scammers to me. But what do I know?
|
|
|
|
Post by Confused Mark Wahlberg on Aug 29, 2020 14:09:18 GMT -5
If you paid even a penny for this, I don't know what to tell you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baldobomb-22-OH-MAN!!! on Aug 29, 2020 14:34:02 GMT -5
If you're willing to pay $200 for one nude picture when there's gazillions of free ones on the internet, you have a problem.
|
|
Sam Punk
Hank Scorpio
Own Nothing, Be Happy
Posts: 6,314
|
Post by Sam Punk on Aug 29, 2020 14:35:24 GMT -5
I've never heard of onlyfans. Is it similar to patreon?
|
|
|
|
Post by eJm on Aug 29, 2020 14:37:09 GMT -5
Honestly its hard for me to be sympathetic. I guess its because the thought of paying to see someone naked is laughable when I can easily do that for free. So they all seem like scammers to me. But what do I know? What does this even mean, dude? Like, the reason this is a big deal is that people who use OnlyFans for the means they do never really had a revenue to make money that benefited them. Sure, you could get custom videos or go in other directions but the income was split so many ways you had to go out of your way to try and go for it. But OF was a means for control, to be able to charge an amount to provide content people wanted. And this just goes further into the way sex workers have been treated in the media, by governments and society at large. Even social media websites that clamp down on pictures of people’s bodies but not the f***ing Nazis that spread more harmful messaging. And besides conning people from a lot of money, this is a celebrity coming into a space without appreciation for the people in that space and potentially opening a market to making it harder to make good money from that space. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2020 14:39:18 GMT -5
If you're willing to pay $200 for one nude picture when there's gazillions of free ones on the internet, you have a problem. And a pretty good job I suppose. |
|
Shark
Hank Scorpio
The world's only Samurai Ninja Pirate
Posts: 7,045
|
Post by Shark on Aug 29, 2020 14:47:35 GMT -5
I've never heard of onlyfans. Is it similar to patreon? Similar, but it allows for more adult content. |
|
ToyfareMark
Vegeta
A WINNER IS YOU!
In Hutch I trust!
Posts: 9,626
|
Post by ToyfareMark on Aug 29, 2020 14:57:08 GMT -5
Honestly its hard for me to be sympathetic. I guess its because the thought of paying to see someone naked is laughable when I can easily do that for free. So they all seem like scammers to me. But what do I know? What does this even mean, dude? Like, the reason this is a big deal is that people who use OnlyFans for the means they do never really had a revenue to make money that benefited them. Sure, you could get custom videos or go in other directions but the income was split so many ways you had to go out of your way to try and go for it. But OF was a means for control, to be able to charge an amount to provide content people wanted. And this just goes further into the way sex workers have been treated in the media, by governments and society at large. Even social media websites that clamp down on pictures of people’s bodies but not the f***ing Nazis that spread more harmful messaging. And besides conning people from a lot of money, this is a celebrity coming into a space without appreciation for the people in that space and potentially opening a market to making it harder to make good money from that space. There's nothing wrong with what they're doing. But for me, someone trying to get to pay them for something like that makes me feel like my intelligence is being insulted. But that's just my personal perspective, what others enjoy is fine, I don't judge. The solution to this is easy though. Just start a new site, problem instantly solved. |
|
|
|
Post by Natural Born Farmer on Aug 29, 2020 14:58:08 GMT -5
Good on her for making money and bringing more attention to a platform with potential.
Be real curious to see what the numbers are in a couple weeks though when people have figured out that no, there isn't going to be explicit adult content featuring her.
|
|
|
|
Post by eJm on Aug 29, 2020 15:00:59 GMT -5
There’s nothing wrong with what they're doing. But for me, someone trying to get to pay them for something like that makes me feel like my intelligence is being insulted. But that's just my personal perspective, what others enjoy is fine, I don't judge. You literally just judged them for it. Like, it’s your second sentence. Because sure, that stuff is simple to do, which is why it was this long for something like this to be this accommodating for sexual workers and other people. If it were that easy to do, it would have happened a long time ago. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2020 15:10:26 GMT -5
Honestly its hard for me to be sympathetic. I guess its because the thought of paying to see someone naked is laughable when I can easily do that for free. So they all seem like scammers to me. But what do I know? Wow, you can easily see naked women for free. I didn't know anyone that cool posted here. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2020 15:10:44 GMT -5
What does this even mean, dude? Like, the reason this is a big deal is that people who use OnlyFans for the means they do never really had a revenue to make money that benefited them. Sure, you could get custom videos or go in other directions but the income was split so many ways you had to go out of your way to try and go for it. But OF was a means for control, to be able to charge an amount to provide content people wanted. And this just goes further into the way sex workers have been treated in the media, by governments and society at large. Even social media websites that clamp down on pictures of people’s bodies but not the f***ing Nazis that spread more harmful messaging. And besides conning people from a lot of money, this is a celebrity coming into a space without appreciation for the people in that space and potentially opening a market to making it harder to make good money from that space. There's nothing wrong with what they're doing. But for me, someone trying to get to pay them for something like that makes me feel like my intelligence is being insulted. But that's just my personal perspective, what others enjoy is fine, I don't judge. The solution to this is easy though. Just start a new site, problem instantly solved. Yeah but it's not too different than paying to buy an issue of Playboy to see a nude celebrity or a particular model back in the day. Having access to other nude photos doesn't really effect that appeal. |
|
chazraps
Wade Wilson
Better have my money when I come-a collect!
Posts: 28,044
|
Post by chazraps on Aug 29, 2020 15:16:16 GMT -5
Bella Thorne was a racist subhuman scum prior to any of this.
Her f***ing up OnlyFans has really made life considerably harder and more dangerous for the consensual sex workers who built that platform.
This is why what she did is a huge problem:
|
|
|
|
Post by Cyno on Aug 29, 2020 15:22:57 GMT -5
There's as much blame to lay at OnlyFans' feet for enabling this and radically changing policy to get around having to suspend a celebrity from their site because of shenanigans.
|
|
ToyfareMark
Vegeta
A WINNER IS YOU!
In Hutch I trust!
Posts: 9,626
|
Post by ToyfareMark on Aug 29, 2020 15:31:59 GMT -5
There's nothing wrong with what they're doing. But for me, someone trying to get to pay them for something like that makes me feel like my intelligence is being insulted. But that's just my personal perspective, what others enjoy is fine, I don't judge. The solution to this is easy though. Just start a new site, problem instantly solved. Yeah but it's not too different than paying to buy an issue of Playboy to see a nude celebrity or a particular model back in the day. Having access to other nude photos doesn't really effect that appeal. Well if anything a strong competitor will come out of this. Which is a good thing. |
|
chazraps
Wade Wilson
Better have my money when I come-a collect!
Posts: 28,044
|
Post by chazraps on Aug 29, 2020 15:32:55 GMT -5
Yeah but it's not too different than paying to buy an issue of Playboy to see a nude celebrity or a particular model back in the day. Having access to other nude photos doesn't really effect that appeal. Well if anything a strong competitor will come out of this. Which is a good thing. It's not worth f***ing up the lives of the people who built the platform during a pandemic. |
|
|
|
Post by Cyno on Aug 29, 2020 15:33:43 GMT -5
I've already seen some OF alternatives crop up and this could elevate one of them. They seem kinda shady, but then OF itself is pretty damn shady even before all this started.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr PONYMANIA Mr Jenzie on Aug 29, 2020 15:51:03 GMT -5
and she stole their money
|
|
