|
Post by Jindrak Mark on Jan 2, 2022 13:48:06 GMT -5
They can do Bianca Vs Becky without needing the title but they aint brave enough to even attempt so no sense in even fantasizing about that direction. That wouldn't be brave, it would be nonsensical. It has to be for the title. Becky blindsided Bianca and took her title. Beating her in a non-title match wouldn't be the proper revenge. Bianca has to end the feud by beating Becky for the title. Plus, the biggest match should always be for the title (unless it involves part-timers). It devalues the title if there are multiple things on the show bigger than it. Remember Alberto Del Rio v Jack Swagger being a Wrestlemania world title match when it was like the 5th biggest match on the card? Imagine Rhea v Liv or Alexa v someone or whatever the Raw title match would be with Bianca and Becky out of the equation. Those aren't Wrestlemania main events. It would be like saying eh, Rock/Austin don't need the title at X7 let's give it to Angle/Benoit instead even if it's nowhere close to being the biggest match.
|
|
asuka007
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,341
|
Post by asuka007 on Jan 2, 2022 13:50:00 GMT -5
As others above said, it’s less that people are “turning on Bianca” and more that people are worried that WWE is doing the exact same thing they always do, picking one person and then just putting all the eggs in that one basket.
Bianca won the belt at Mania last year, she was pushed very strong until Summerslam. She beat most everybody. She won SS basically three on one this year. And we’ve seen her vs. Becky for months last year.
Meanwhile, WWE has utterly failed to properly elevate anyone besides her and Becky. So if it just leads to Becky vs. Bianca AGAIN, and Bianca getting “coronated” at Mania AGAIN, it really does not feel like there’s been any progress. We’re basically just back where we started last year.
Also, who is a credible threat to Bianca after that?
Repetitive booking, that’s the major issue in so much of WWE. They need to get past the idea that it’s either “barely use someone at all” or “cram them down people’s throats so much that people get sick of them.” They struggle to find a balance between those.
|
|
|
Post by mistery on Jan 2, 2022 13:53:06 GMT -5
Nah, I heavily disagree with this. The backlash towards Bianca sounds wild especially given what she's done the past year. Since becoming champion last year she's beaten Sasha (Horsewoman), Bayley (Horsewoman), Carmella (established former champion) and Zelina (longer tenure talent). Once she lost the title to Becky she's only added Liv Morgan (who's elevated after their match and faced Becky last night), Tamina (older talent) and Doudrop (newer talent). I'm not even mentioning all the times she's beaten these older people. For all the whining and complaining about Bianca's push all I'm seeing is that she mostly beats these older acts who were steamrolling everyone else. It's hard to take any "Bianca's being pushed above all these other new talent guys they need to change it it's a negative" comments seriously when the only real feud she's had with a newer talent was Doudrop. She's just putting the boots to these older people which is exactly what a new talent should do. That's common sense, that's how you keep someone in the conversation and that's how you use these people. Saying they need to move onto someone else when Bianca's reign had a horrible ending is just silly and it's just saying "well hey, your ending is bad but forget that let's go to someone else" when the reality is no it needs to say "hey your ending was bad but we're going to do what we can to make up for it and bring you back up so then when you're back up you make someone else." So if they're really trying to keep Bianca hot and they'll make up for that trash finish then good, that's what they SHOULD DO. That's what they should have done for Kofi. That's what they need to do for Big E. That's what they should do for every talent who's hot and then loses in a bad way. Because it keeps them in the conversation and it's using them to help others when needed. But with Bianca...apparently they shouldn't do that...and people want them to move onto someone else like they did with Kofi and Big E...even when it's clear that they haven't utilized her to her max yet... Got it. That sounds nasty from an optics standpoint. I don't know but it sounds like people are just scared like they always are when it comes to WWE booking. They're actually doing something right with her here which I'm giving em props for. If people are afraid of the future and afraid of fan backlash and such then hey be afraid. I can't stop yall from being that way but with that said we can't be saying they need to flip the off switch on her when we were saying that's what they need to not do for talent once they lose titles. I hope everybody who loses a title badly gets the "Bianca post-title" push because it keeps them hot, in the conversation and it's best for all talent working with them. That's just the dream for talent. Problem with this entire argument is, and wait for it: Bianca bulldozing over people is not good for business. What if she gets injured or suddenly decides to stop one day? Then the division is screwed, because whoops they had her destroy everyone else's momentum. Also if you want to bring race into it, I would argue black talent has been treated a hell of a lot better in WWE overall than other minority talents have. Especially when you have the head booker (Bruce Pritchard) going on his podcast openly making remarks about how Asians are "too foreign" and that they "can't get over, because I don't understand them". I think everyone knows Bianca is getting the title back at Mania. But she doesn't need to go destroy a bunch of women afterwards either, like she did with her Smackdown reign. It's also not fair to the fans of other women who keep getting screwed over by WWE booking. Look at Asuka as the perfect example of this. If all you look at are the accolades without looking any deeper, then she looks incredibly decorated. But the moment you put any sort of scrutiny into it, you realize that she's had it significantly worse than Bianca. And I'm sure if she loses the title again before Mania next year, people will be scrambling to see her coronated again at the following Wrestlemania. WWE's utter refusal to push other women is going to bite them in the ass again. If you are content with Bianca feuding with the horsewomen for years on end, that's great for you. But ratings are definitely reflecting otherwise with fans tuning out in droves over WWE's repetitive booking.
|
|
|
Post by Jindrak Mark on Jan 2, 2022 13:55:44 GMT -5
You nailed it. Bianca is super over and is barely getting any pushback on her push, even online. And the feud is still fresh. It should main event one of the nights of Mania easily and should be a highlight. You are missing the point of what is being discussed. Yes she has support right now, but what about after she wins the title? Will she keep that support as she bulldozes through a bunch of other women who are just as good as she is, if not better? And also deserve their time in the spotlight? Probably not. The point is that Bianca's push is coming at the expense of a lot of other women who won't be allowed the chance to shine. And that absolutely will breed growing resentment that will only get worse as she continues to be pushed at a huge level. It may not be happening significantly now, but there will absolutely start being some sort of pushback if she gets the title again and bulldozes the division again (including running over women who fans feel have been slighted). People said the exact same thing about Becky 2-3 years ago. She's booked too strong, fans are going to turn on her after Wrestlemania but it didn't happen. Then when Sasha returned people said Becky would get booed against her. Didn't happen. When she feuded with Asuka okay now they'll turn on her. Nope. When Shayna got called up, for real this time people are going to cheer the cool NXT call-up over her. Again, it never happened. I'm not denying that their will be online discourse of people turning on Bianca but there's no indication the actual paying audience in arenas will. She's likeable, charismatic and has good matches. I see no reason why people won't keep cheering her. I do agree that Bianca shouldn't win the Royal Rumble though. I'm never in favor of anyone winning it twice in a row. If Sasha's beating Charlotte then let her win the RR and Bianca can earn her shot another way.
|
|
|
Post by polarbearpete on Jan 2, 2022 13:57:02 GMT -5
IMO it is not that any real majority are turning on Bianca but instead no one wants to but WWE booking is pushing her in the direction of just throwing all their eggs into one f***ing basket again with her. She won the rumble She main evented and won the title at Mania She was the sole survivor at SVS overcoming 3 on 1 odds Has pretty much trounced the rest of the Raw womens division All the usual call signs of WWE sacrificing the rest of the division to prop up one woman is there and it never ends well ever. They can do Bianca Vs Becky without needing the title but they aint brave enough to even attempt so no sense in even fantasizing about that direction. If everyone is a main eventer that gets pushed and they take turns on top, then no one is a star. As a company, you have to pick talent and get behind them and push them into being stars. The way to do that is through extended main event programs and title runs. Cycling out Bianca into a non-title Becky feud when they’re both in their primes (or in Bianca‘s case probably not even there yet) is not the way to build stars in my opinion. Especially when Bianca is so fresh into her run.
|
|
asuka007
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,341
|
Post by asuka007 on Jan 2, 2022 13:57:39 GMT -5
Bianca honestly was already running out of challengers in her first title reign before Becky. She had battered her way through most of the other women. And the division is even thinner now than it was then.
Now if WWE had properly built others up, and not kept firing people, then you could make this work.
But as it stands, it Bianca bears Becky then she has no true star-feeling challengers on Raw after that.
|
|
|
Post by polarbearpete on Jan 2, 2022 14:00:25 GMT -5
Bianca honestly was already running out of challengers in her first title reign before Becky. She had battered her way through most of the other women. And the division is even thinner now than it was then. Now if WWE had properly built others up, and not kept firing people, then you could make this work. But as it stands, it Bianca bears Becky then she has no true star-feeling challengers on Raw after that. Ripley. Asuka. Beth. Bayley if they move her to SD. A heel Bliss.
|
|
|
Post by Jindrak Mark on Jan 2, 2022 14:03:16 GMT -5
Bianca honestly was already running out of challengers in her first title reign before Becky. She had battered her way through most of the other women. And the division is even thinner now than it was then. Now if WWE had properly built others up, and not kept firing people, then you could make this work. But as it stands, it Bianca bears Becky then she has no true star-feeling challengers on Raw after that. Becky rematch. Alexa and Asuka will be back after Wrestlemania (maybe even before). Zelina has been winning for like 2 straight months now and could be a challenger of the month. Rhea after she hopefully turns heel. That would cover almost all of 2022 before you even get into Smackdown/NXT drafts or call ups.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2022 14:05:35 GMT -5
They can do Bianca Vs Becky without needing the title but they aint brave enough to even attempt so no sense in even fantasizing about that direction. That wouldn't be brave, it would be nonsensical. It has to be for the title. Becky blindsided Bianca and took her title. Beating her in a non-title match wouldn't be the proper revenge. Bianca has to end the feud by beating Becky for the title. Plus, the biggest match should always be for the title (unless it involves part-timers). It devalues the title if there are multiple things on the show bigger than it. Remember Alberto Del Rio v Jack Swagger being a Wrestlemania world title match when it was like the 5th biggest match on the card? Imagine Rhea v Liv or Alexa v someone or whatever the Raw title match would be with Bianca and Becky out of the equation. Those aren't Wrestlemania main events. It would be like saying eh, Rock/Austin don't need the title at X7 let's give it to Angle/Benoit instead even if it's nowhere close to being the biggest match. I will concede that yes as far as a proper story ending goes yes Bianca beating Becky for the title is proper revenge for what happened to her but so is beating her just as quickly since the crux of it was not that Becky beat her for the title but in how quickly Becky beat her. Now as far as the biggest match should always be for the title...maybe because honestly in depends on the story because it's been proven in the past that the biggest match does not always end up being for the title..Rock Vs Hogan for example. And lets be honest it is not just the womens title but all titles in modern WWE are devalued because of the simple fact there are multiples of them so there is nothing further to devalue so Bianca Vs Becky without the title would not change the fact WWE would push and advertise it over a title match that involves idk Rhea Vs Dudrop because that is how this shit for brains company works.
|
|
|
Post by mistery on Jan 2, 2022 14:23:52 GMT -5
Bianca honestly was already running out of challengers in her first title reign before Becky. She had battered her way through most of the other women. And the division is even thinner now than it was then. Now if WWE had properly built others up, and not kept firing people, then you could make this work. But as it stands, it Bianca bears Becky then she has no true star-feeling challengers on Raw after that. Ripley. Asuka. Beth. Bayley if they move her to SD. A heel Bliss. Ripley: Maybe. Depends on how things shake out between now and Wrestlemania with her. But considering she's been going 50/50 with Queen Zelina, probably not a good omen. Asuka: Not credible at all right now. Her having the worst win/loss rate of any main roster woman in 2021 plus being constantly booked to look like a complete moron has borderline destroyed her credibility. Beth: Almost certainly not returning to the ring full time. Probably a one-off between Edge/Beth vs Miz/Maryse and that's it. Bayley: They had Bianca completely and utterly run her over no less than 4 times last year alone. Bliss: It's pretty obvious they don't see her as champion material anymore considering she can't go more than two months without getting injured. Also you seem to be overlooking one very major factor here: The horsewomen will still be around. And WWE loves shoving them into title feuds whenever possible, other women be damned. People like to complain about Bianca being damaged at Summerslam, but women like Asuka have had it so much worse. Bianca lost at Summerslam in 26 seconds. Okay sure. Unfortunate. That was the absolute worst thing that happened to Bianca though. Meanwhile Asuka ended 2020 and started 2021 by getting squashed and having to act scared of Alexa Bliss and having none of her offense sold. And then was completely humiliated by Rhea Ripley and lost at Wrestlemania. Then disappeared until MITB. And is completely off of TV now recovering from an injury, and will probably come back to the same spot she was in when she left, buried ten feet under. I would argue losing in 26 seconds at Summerslam is bad, but nowhere near as bad as having your offense no sold and then losing in less than a minute to Alexa Bliss, and then constantly losing matches for months and months after that because WWE had this "bright" idea to push Lacey Evans over Asuka despite the storyline she was involved in being one of the worst storylines in modern WWE history. So I would argue that they should fix other stars like Asuka who actually need it, over women who don't, like Bianca. Because they've screwed up a hell of a lot more and a hell of a lot worse with her than they have Bianca.
|
|
|
Post by polarbearpete on Jan 2, 2022 14:36:23 GMT -5
Ripley. Asuka. Beth. Bayley if they move her to SD. A heel Bliss. Ripley: Maybe. Depends on how things shake out between now and Wrestlemania with her. But considering she's been going 50/50 with Queen Zelina, probably not a good omen. Asuka: Not credible at all right now. Her having the worst win/loss rate of any main roster woman in 2021 plus being constantly booked to look like a complete moron has borderline destroyed her credibility. Beth: Almost certainly not returning to the ring full time. Probably a one-off between Edge/Beth vs Miz/Maryse and that's it. Bayley: They had Bianca completely and utterly run her over no less than 4 times last year alone. Bliss: It's pretty obvious they don't see her as champion material anymore considering she can't go more than two months without getting injured. Also you seem to be overlooking one very major factor here: The horsewomen will still be around. And WWE loves shoving them into title feuds whenever possible, other women be damned. People like to complain about Bianca being damaged at Summerslam, but women like Asuka have had it so much worse. Bianca lost at Summerslam in 26 seconds. Okay sure. Unfortunate. That was the absolute worst thing that happened to Bianca though. Meanwhile Asuka ended 2020 and started 2021 by getting squashed and having to act scared of Alexa Bliss and having none of her offense sold. And then was completely humiliated by Rhea Ripley and lost at Wrestlemania. Then disappeared until MITB. And is completely off of TV now recovering from an injury, and will probably come back to the same spot she was in when she left, buried ten feet under. I would argue losing in 26 seconds at Summerslam is bad, but nowhere near as bad as having your offense no sold and then losing in less than a minute to Alexa Bliss, and then constantly losing matches for months and months after that because WWE had this "bright" idea to push Lacey Evans over Asuka despite the storyline she was involved in being one of the worst storylines in modern WWE history. So I would argue that they should fix other stars like Asuka who actually need it, over women who don't, like Bianca. Because they've screwed up a hell of a lot more and a hell of a lot worse with her than they have Bianca. Sorry but Asuka could come back tomorrow and instantly be credible enough to main event Mania with Becky. She hasn’t had any damage to her credibility from an objective standpoint. And Beth quit her commentary gig and debuted a new look. I’m pretty sure she’s going to be back for a run.
|
|
|
Post by BatPunk on Jan 2, 2022 14:39:07 GMT -5
They pushed Bianca as a roll model, instead of a champion. They could have easily had both.
|
|
|
Post by polarbearpete on Jan 2, 2022 14:42:43 GMT -5
They pushed Bianca as a roll model, instead of a champion. They could have easily had both. She’s just getting started.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2022 14:48:23 GMT -5
They pushed Bianca as a roll model, instead of a champion. They could have easily had both. She’s just getting started. One could argue she has already peaked. She won the rumble , mainevented WM and won the title , sole survivor at SVS and all that is really left for her to do is just win the title however many more times in the years to come.
|
|
|
Post by 06vwgti on Jan 2, 2022 14:52:02 GMT -5
Bianca honestly was already running out of challengers in her first title reign before Becky. She had battered her way through most of the other women. And the division is even thinner now than it was then. Now if WWE had properly built others up, and not kept firing people, then you could make this work. But as it stands, it Bianca bears Becky then she has no true star-feeling challengers on Raw after that. Ripley. Asuka. Beth. Bayley if they move her to SD. A heel Bliss. And they'll run through those feuds so fast, that it won't mean anything in the end, which exposes the roster being too small on both the sd and raw end of things. The Bianca-Piper feud was wasted as it was.
|
|
|
Post by "Evil Brood" Jackson Vanik on Jan 2, 2022 14:55:38 GMT -5
Ripley. Asuka. Beth. Bayley if they move her to SD. A heel Bliss. And they'll run through those feuds so fast, that it won't mean anything in the end, which exposes the roster being too small on both the sd and raw end of things. The Bianca-Piper feud was wasted as it was. No matter how talented Bianca is, the size of the roster is going to remain a limiting factor. They likely won't do it but given RAW/SmackDown are the money makers, I would just completely drain NXT of the top female talent and beef up the main roster. Move NXT to Peacock and fully rip off the bandaid and let it be a developmental product.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2022 15:00:19 GMT -5
Nah, I heavily disagree with this. The backlash towards Bianca sounds wild especially given what she's done the past year. Since becoming champion last year she's beaten Sasha (Horsewoman), Bayley (Horsewoman), Carmella (established former champion) and Zelina (longer tenure talent). Once she lost the title to Becky she's only added Liv Morgan (who's elevated after their match and faced Becky last night), Tamina (older talent) and Doudrop (newer talent). I'm not even mentioning all the times she's beaten these older people. For all the whining and complaining about Bianca's push all I'm seeing is that she mostly beats these older acts who were steamrolling everyone else. It's hard to take any "Bianca's being pushed above all these other new talent guys they need to change it it's a negative" comments seriously when the only real feud she's had with a newer talent was Doudrop. She's just putting the boots to these older people which is exactly what a new talent should do. That's common sense, that's how you keep someone in the conversation and that's how you use these people. Saying they need to move onto someone else when Bianca's reign had a horrible ending is just silly and it's just saying "well hey, your ending is bad but forget that let's go to someone else" when the reality is no it needs to say "hey your ending was bad but we're going to do what we can to make up for it and bring you back up so then when you're back up you make someone else." So if they're really trying to keep Bianca hot and they'll make up for that trash finish then good, that's what they SHOULD DO. That's what they should have done for Kofi. That's what they need to do for Big E. That's what they should do for every talent who's hot and then loses in a bad way. Because it keeps them in the conversation and it's using them to help others when needed. But with Bianca...apparently they shouldn't do that...and people want them to move onto someone else like they did with Kofi and Big E...even when it's clear that they haven't utilized her to her max yet... Got it. That sounds nasty from an optics standpoint. I don't know but it sounds like people are just scared like they always are when it comes to WWE booking. They're actually doing something right with her here which I'm giving em props for. If people are afraid of the future and afraid of fan backlash and such then hey be afraid. I can't stop yall from being that way but with that said we can't be saying they need to flip the off switch on her when we were saying that's what they need to not do for talent once they lose titles. I hope everybody who loses a title badly gets the "Bianca post-title" push because it keeps them hot, in the conversation and it's best for all talent working with them. That's just the dream for talent. Problem with this entire argument is, and wait for it: Bianca bulldozing over people is not good for business. What if she gets injured or suddenly decides to stop one day? Then the division is screwed, because whoops they had her destroy everyone else's momentum. Also if you want to bring race into it, I would argue black talent has been treated a hell of a lot better in WWE overall than other minority talents have. Especially when you have the head booker (Bruce Pritchard) going on his podcast openly making remarks about how Asians are "too foreign" and that they "can't get over, because I don't understand them". I think everyone knows Bianca is getting the title back at Mania. But she doesn't need to go destroy a bunch of women afterwards either, like she did with her Smackdown reign. It's also not fair to the fans of other women who keep getting screwed over by WWE booking. Look at Asuka as the perfect example of this. If all you look at are the accolades without looking any deeper, then she looks incredibly decorated. But the moment you put any sort of scrutiny into it, you realize that she's had it significantly worse than Bianca. And I'm sure if she loses the title again before Mania next year, people will be scrambling to see her coronated again at the following Wrestlemania. WWE's utter refusal to push other women is going to bite them in the ass again. If you are content with Bianca feuding with the horsewomen for years on end, that's great for you. But ratings are definitely reflecting otherwise with fans tuning out in droves over WWE's repetitive booking. What?
Bianca lost to Becky multiple times and besides barely beating Liv in a fatal-4-way match they had, Liv later on came out on top in another match to really kick her Becky feud into gear. That's not bulldozing because Bianca's actually been taking Ls here and there. Maybe WWE needs to break things down further for people to understand because it's pretty clear to me that they're majorly pushing 3 women in the Raw Women's Division: Becky, Liv and Bianca. Bianca's the amazing babyface that can take an L every once in a while, Becky is the sneaky heel who's at the top of the division and Liv's the underdog babyface fighting for her chance. This is a far change from years ago when it was just a Horsewoman on one brand and the other 2 either injured or sitting out. If for some reason people are omitting Becky and refusing to not admit that Liv is actually getting a push I don't know what to tell you because that's basic storytelling.
The problem with your posts are that you're speaking on "what ifs" rather than facts. Yeah, what if Bianca gets injured? You've got Liv being pushed beside her so they're good. We can do "what if Becky gets hurt" then you've got Bianca and Liv there. When we speak on this it needs to be said that there's literally 3 women on that brand being majorly pushed rather than just one so no, I'm not going to do the "but what if Bianca bulldozes all the other wom-" argument. It sounds like people just being scared and blocking out certain parts of what's happening to fit their narrative. There's a huge difference between her initial title run and her run now and that's the fact they're pushing more than 1 woman now.
Secondly to the "black talent have been treated better than other minorities are" comment, you completely missed the context of what I was saying when I brought up Big E and Kofi. I brought them up because they're black talent who lost their titles to white wrestlers and as Kofi shown us, he was pushed down. We don't know what's happening with Big E yet. Bianca however is still being kept in storylines and still getting somewhat of a single's push. My comment had nothing to do with other minorities, it had to do with how they're actually using a black talent correctly after losing a title. Don't try to pit "minority against minority" here to try to shoot down what I said. If you think we're being treated "too good compared to other minorities" and you want another black superstar to be pushed down like Kofi then say that. That's not what I'm going to say though because pushing Bianca down like Kofi does nobody favors. That's foul and if you agree with that needing to be done then you've got a problem. As for Bruce Prichard, I don't listen to dude nor do I know what he said but of course that's bullshit. Still, that doesn't take away from my point of them using a black wrestler correctly after a title loss (Bianca's push continuing) as that's what needs to happen when people lose titles. They do not need to be pushed to the back. If so then you've got people cracking jokes and throwing shots rather than being happy with someone's booking. If someone is pushed down you get the "Kofi deserved better this sucks" comments and if someone is doing good like Bianca is now we've got threads like this. Pick your poison. Either way it's poison.
Not everyone knows "Bianca is getting the title back at Wrestlemania" nor is that sure to happen, I don't even know where this comes from. Even Meltzer/F4W said recently that Reigns/Lesnar for WM was the match they setup ahead of time. While that would make the most sense, that's just people assuming so because they somehow think Bianca's the most pushed woman in this division when the reality is Becky's push usurps hers.
For all of the "WWE has bad booking" comments I'm seeing (including in this thread) yall saying that Bianca would get the title back against Becky at Wrestlemania would be good booking. So which is it really? Are you saying WWE is actually going to do something good or is that just something said?
No, I'm not going to entertain any "Asuka's booking is trash and her WWE's career actually been worse than Bianca's even with all of her accolades" talk. I've said it before and I'll say it again: major Asuka fans want her to devour the world and they underrate her booking and everything she's done simply because she got her ass beat multiple times by Charlotte and Becky. I just can't take any of that seriously, it looks superfan-ish to me.
At the end of the day, the only thing your post and this thread's shown me is that WWE needs to really break down what it means to be "pushed" in the grand scheme of things. Yes, Bianca is getting pushed. No, she isn't the only woman getting pushed. Becky's getting pushed and is getting pushed over Bianca. Liv is still getting pushed especially when Meltzer said Becky was supposed to cheat to beat her last night. Believe it or not but Zelina and Carmella are being pushed and that's especially for Zelina considering she became Queen Zelina and then won a title. Doudrop is actually being pushed, that last Bianca match showed us she's the second lead female heel on Raw, she almost beat Bianca and once Becky's beaten Doudrop's the lead heel. Like, we are literally getting more women pushed than we have in a long time but apparently people are afraid of Bianca without seeing all the moving parts.
I don't get it.
Fans aren't tuning out for Bianca. They're tuning out because of people like Bianca being screwed like she was screwed at Summerslam. Even so, then you've got a small amount of fans actually upset about Bianca not turning into a Kofi and actually still being in storylines even claiming she's bulldozing others. Even if they're midcard storylines and even though she's mostly beating established talent people have complained about for years.
Again, pick your poison.
|
|
|
Post by Jindrak Mark on Jan 2, 2022 15:06:05 GMT -5
She’s just getting started. One could argue she has already peaked. She won the rumble , mainevented WM and won the title , sole survivor at SVS and all that is really left for her to do is just win the title however many more times in the years to come. You could say that about almost every top star. If you're in your prime you can still have years to go and tons of money to make. On paper Hogan had done it all by 87, Bret by 94, Shawn by 96, Austin by 98, Rock by 2000, Lesnar by 2003, Batista by 2005, Cena by 2008, Orton by 2009, Roman by 2016, Becky by 2019 yet they all had many great moments/matches way beyond those points. And even Bianca's great year has an asterisk next to it because her Rumble win happened in front of no fans and her Wrestlemania main event was in a stadium when they were only allowed a quarter capacity. I doubt she's satisfied to just say okay, I've done it all, let's fall back now.
|
|
|
Post by polarbearpete on Jan 2, 2022 17:45:59 GMT -5
Ripley. Asuka. Beth. Bayley if they move her to SD. A heel Bliss. And they'll run through those feuds so fast, that it won't mean anything in the end, which exposes the roster being too small on both the sd and raw end of things. The Bianca-Piper feud was wasted as it was. The roster is too small but between those I named, and any NXT callups, new signings, and returns there’s plenty to get through the year until the draft.
|
|
|
Post by 06vwgti on Jan 2, 2022 18:10:39 GMT -5
And they'll run through those feuds so fast, that it won't mean anything in the end, which exposes the roster being too small on both the sd and raw end of things. The Bianca-Piper feud was wasted as it was. The roster is too small but between those I named, and any NXT callups, new signings, and returns there’s plenty to get through the year until the draft. With those you named no, its not enough with a tag division still gutted, with the nxt call ups yes it might be enough for singles, but not including a tag team, and no I don't want to argue with you no the tag division again b/c I won't agree with you
|
|