|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Dec 7, 2007 22:11:03 GMT -5
 Heh? Oh, you mean the people pointing out why it was likely that ECW had a low rating? Meh. Celebrate. This probably means that a special Smackdown star will be on the show next time ECW is on Thursday. Special? I thought Eugene got released.  ... What?...Wha... WHY WASN'T I INFORMED!?! |
|
|
|
Post by WWE Trademarked My Name on Dec 7, 2007 22:15:06 GMT -5
Jesus, can we have 1 victory that doesn't get crapped on? Please?! When it is earned. Yes. They beat WWE's most uninteresting, unhyped show on a day it usually doesn't even usually air if they can beat ECW on Tuesday's I'd actually care. |
|
AriadosMan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Your friendly neighborhood superhero
Posts: 15,620
|
Post by AriadosMan on Dec 7, 2007 22:16:50 GMT -5
When it is earned. Yes. They beat WWE's most uninteresting, unhyped show on a day it usually doesn't even usually air if they can beat ECW on Tuesday's I'd actually care. We won. You lost. Deal with it. |
|
|
|
Post by Timmy8271 on Dec 7, 2007 22:19:40 GMT -5
Who are "We"? You guys are members of TNA now?
|
|
|
|
Post by Panda Bear on Dec 7, 2007 22:21:28 GMT -5
When it is earned. Yes. They beat WWE's most uninteresting, unhyped show on a day it usually doesn't even usually air if they can beat ECW on Tuesday's I'd actually care. We won. You lost. Deal with it. |
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Dec 7, 2007 22:22:06 GMT -5
Who are "We"? You guys are members of TNA now? It's a common thing. When someone's "team" wins, they tend to feel joyus and part of the victory so they say "We won." Whereas, if the team loses, they feel dejected and upset and say, "They lost." Ha. One psychology class and I still babble about it... |
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on Dec 7, 2007 22:23:03 GMT -5
Who are "We"? You guys are members of TNA now? It's a common thing. When someone's "team" wins, they tend to feel joyus and part of the victory so they say "We won." Whereas, if the team loses, they feel dejected and upset and say, "They lost." Ha. One psychology class and I still babble about it... And you wonder why no one tells you things.... |
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Dec 7, 2007 22:25:10 GMT -5
It's a common thing. When someone's "team" wins, they tend to feel joyus and part of the victory so they say "We won." Whereas, if the team loses, they feel dejected and upset and say, "They lost." Ha. One psychology class and I still babble about it... And you wonder why no one tells you things.... But...But...no wonder I got a B in that class... |
|
|
|
Post by Red Impact on Dec 7, 2007 22:26:37 GMT -5
I didn't even know this was some big surprise. TNA does what they always do in the ratings. ECW drops significantly as it's pre-empted and barely advertised. I mean, I could understand the feeling of victory if TNA jumped in the ratings, but it seems far more like what happened was exactly what happens when a nominally rated show gets preempted and moved without much advertising at all.
I suppose there's a sense of accomplishment at not being creamed, but in everything happening as expected?
|
|
|
|
Post by slasher911 on Dec 7, 2007 22:26:57 GMT -5
When it is earned. Yes. They beat WWE's most uninteresting, unhyped show on a day it usually doesn't even usually air if they can beat ECW on Tuesday's I'd actually care. We won. You lost. Deal with it. So that makes TNA 1-52 against ECW for the year? ****, I didn't even know ECW was on Thursday. And THAT is the reason why ECW had a low rating. ;D That explains why Witches of Breastwick 2 had such high ratings instead ^_^ |
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Dec 7, 2007 22:27:45 GMT -5
We won. You lost. Deal with it. So that makes TNA 1-52 against ECW for the year? And THAT is the reason why ECW had a low rating. ;D That explains why Witches of Breastwick 2 had such high ratings instead ^_^ ... They made a sequel?! ... I mean...how dare you watch..such...filth... |
|
|
|
Post by WWE Trademarked My Name on Dec 7, 2007 22:27:56 GMT -5
When it is earned. Yes. They beat WWE's most uninteresting, unhyped show on a day it usually doesn't even usually air if they can beat ECW on Tuesday's I'd actually care. We won. You lost. Deal with it. We? I don't even hate TNA I was just stating a fact. What's the big deal about beating an unhyped episode of a tv show that WWE replays on their website. I watched neither shows because neither caught my interest however if I did I probably would have chosen TNA to see the outcome of their last PPV. So does that consider me one of you or do I have to get pissy when anything that might even sound semi-negative towards TNA is said in order to join the club? |
|
Rube
Hank Scorpio
Sammich Bogart
It's always the same and it's always different.
Posts: 5,619
|
Post by Rube on Dec 7, 2007 22:30:42 GMT -5
It doesn't mean anything. See what would happen if Impact went to Tuesday one week. The better show did win though.  |
|
Blindkarevik
Grimlock
Rock... Paper... Straight-edge!
I Like To <blank>
Posts: 14,343
|
Post by Blindkarevik on Dec 7, 2007 22:31:46 GMT -5
I watched TNA last night. I don't take sides on the "Which company is better" thing, as I'm a fan of wrestling. However, the past few weeks a lot of ECW guys have been on Smackdown and vice versa... I have an equal chance of seeing almost anybody on Smackdown as I do on ECW..
However, I like taking a break and seeing the MCMGs, AJ Styles and Samoa Joe. So TNA won out either way last night.
|
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on Dec 7, 2007 22:32:57 GMT -5
Honestly, I'm glad that, for one week, I don't have to hear in the ECW ratings threads "Oh, at least we beat TNA" or "TNA would kill for that kind of ratings". Those seriously ate at me, not to mention that's the most BS excuse you can give when things are bad.
|
|
AriadosMan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Your friendly neighborhood superhero
Posts: 15,620
|
Post by AriadosMan on Dec 7, 2007 22:33:29 GMT -5
Sorry guys, I'm just happy TNA actually won, and we get so much negativity about TNA on these forums. I'm just happy that something went well for them for once ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by plushtar on Dec 7, 2007 22:33:51 GMT -5
Everyone knows that one-time temporary schedule changes harm the ratings. Everyone has been saying that when WWE & Sci-Fi announced this.
|
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Dec 7, 2007 22:36:57 GMT -5
Honestly, I'm glad that, for one week, I don't have to hear in the ECW ratings threads "Oh, at least we beat TNA" or "TNA would kill for that kind of ratings". Those seriously ate at me, not to mention that's the most BS excuse you can give when things are bad. I feel the same way with "What do you expect, TNA is a young company!" when they keep getting the same ratings. However, the most BS excuse you can give when things are bad? Nielson Ratings "Glitch" ;D |
|
AriadosMan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Your friendly neighborhood superhero
Posts: 15,620
|
Post by AriadosMan on Dec 7, 2007 22:37:59 GMT -5
I feel the same way with "What do you expect, TNA is a young company!" when they keep getting the same ratings. However, the most BS excuse you can give when things are bad? Nielson Ratings "Glitch" ;D ECW is guilty of this as well. |
|
|
|
Post by lildude8218 on Dec 7, 2007 22:39:01 GMT -5
Are more detailed ratings out yet? It seems that TNA did a 1.1 over the course of 2 hours while ECW got their rating for that hour. It would be interesting to see the actual 10-11 rating.
|
|
