|
|
Post by Bob Schlapowitz on Nov 5, 2009 9:05:43 GMT -5
Yeah because its TNAs fault Hogan is a douchebag! He has been one his whole life, its not like it was gonna change now. So, you know the guy? |
|
|
|
Post by CrazySting on Nov 5, 2009 10:19:11 GMT -5
Yeah because its TNAs fault Hogan is a douchebag! He has been one his whole life, its not like it was gonna change now. So, you know the guy? The fact that Hulk genuinely believes God punished a young Iraq war veteran for anger issues and social problems, by turning him to a vegetable seems to indicate that he is, indeed, an asshole. |
|
Full of IT.
ALF
If you wanna win............. make it a win.
Posts: 1,072
|
Post by Full of IT. on Nov 5, 2009 10:55:40 GMT -5
"The kid's pretty much a racist so really if you look at it, he had it coming"
Booooo Hulk.
|
|
Massive G
Hank Scorpio
yo hago esto
Posts: 6,224
|
Post by Massive G on Nov 5, 2009 14:15:56 GMT -5
sometimes, you don't need to personally know someone to know they're a douche. Terry Bollea is one of those people.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 5, 2009 15:12:53 GMT -5
Yeah because its TNAs fault Hogan is a douchebag! He has been one his whole life, its not like it was gonna change now. So, you know the guy? If you believe there is any correlation between a public person's public persona and their private persona, then statistical extrapolations about the person's private persona, derived from their public persona, are at least somewhat valid. |
|
Dave at the Movies
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
VINTAGE D-DAY DAVE! Always cranking dat thing.
Posts: 18,228
|
Post by Dave at the Movies on Nov 5, 2009 15:37:49 GMT -5
Hogan should just never speak out of character again.............NEVER!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Solid Stryk-Dizzle on Nov 5, 2009 15:48:18 GMT -5
Can you imagine this, IN CHARACTER?
Let me tell you something brother! That dirty stinky John Graziano hates the black people dude! I guess god struck him down with the Nickster's car, Brother!
|
|
|
|
Post by Black Swagger on Nov 5, 2009 16:24:56 GMT -5
There is so much ammunition for this case that it's not even funny. If I were Hogan, I would just say "No comment" to just about everything.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 5, 2009 16:44:00 GMT -5
I'm a firm believer in personal responsibility. John Graziano chose not to put on a seatbelt, and Nick was driving impaired and driving recklessly. If John had put on a seatbelt he may not be in his position. Nick should have told him to put the belt on though. And maybe he did, but you can't force someone do to something.
And yes Hogan should probably shut up.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Emoticon Man, TF Fan on Nov 5, 2009 21:32:05 GMT -5
I'm a firm believer in personal responsibility. John Graziano chose not to put on a seatbelt, and Nick was driving impaired and driving recklessly. If John had put on a seatbelt he may not be in his position. Nick should have told him to put the belt on though. And maybe he did, but you can't force someone do to something. And yes Hogan should probably shut up. Ditto. And, really, it's more than just the seat belt. I don't know about anyone else, but I for one have enough damn sense not to get into a car with a person who might just be intoxicated. Does it suck that he's left the way he is? Sure. But if he hadn't have been an idiot, we wouldn't be talking about this. |
|
Fade
Patti Mayonnaise
Posts: 38,630
|
Post by Fade on Nov 6, 2009 5:15:55 GMT -5
This entire debacle, every little aspect of it, disgusts, disturbs, and saddens me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ryushinku on Nov 6, 2009 5:53:00 GMT -5
There is so much ammunition for this case that it's not even funny. If I were Hogan, I would just say "No comment" to just about everything. Not exactly Hogan's style though. He takes that big stinky 'no comment' and slams him through the earth's crust. |
|
|
|
Post by Richard on Nov 6, 2009 12:15:06 GMT -5
Ditto. And, really, it's more than just the seat belt. I don't know about anyone else, but I for one have enough damn sense not to get into a car with a person who might just be intoxicated. If you're drunk as well, would you be thinking clearly enough to do that? |
|
Jay Peas 42
El Dandy
Totally flips out ALL the time.
Is looking forward to a Nation of Domination Kwannza Special.
Posts: 8,329 
|
Post by Jay Peas 42 on Nov 6, 2009 15:19:42 GMT -5
Well, in all fairness, I'm going to say that if you survived a car crash that nearly killed your friend, you are going to have issues, and Hogan as your father, is going to want to console you on that. Argueing that God makes good things happen to good people and bad things happen to bad people is very elementry theology, but in turn very flawed, which is why Hulk is a wrestler, and not a theologian. Hmm, that sounds like a photoshop contest. The Bible as Told by Hulk Hogan. In any case, I don't know any of these people, but as with everyone who doesn't control public money, I am willing to give Hogan the benefit of the doubt,
|
|
AriadosMan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Your friendly neighborhood superhero
Posts: 15,620
|
Post by AriadosMan on Nov 6, 2009 15:30:39 GMT -5
Question:
What exactly does Hogan gain from claiming this guy was racist/homophobic? Does that really excuse the fact that Hulk, not Nick, bought the booze and owned the car?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Emoticon Man, TF Fan on Nov 6, 2009 17:59:24 GMT -5
Ditto. And, really, it's more than just the seat belt. I don't know about anyone else, but I for one have enough damn sense not to get into a car with a person who might just be intoxicated. If you're drunk as well, would you be thinking clearly enough to do that? That'd never happen, as I have enough sense to not even drink, much less get drunk. And if I did drink, I'd have enough sense to make arrangements for my own safety beforehand. And, in any event, being drunk isn't an excuse to do stupid stuff, in my opinion. If a drunk driver can be held responsible for the stupid stuff he does, a drunk passenger can be held responsible for their own choices as well. |
|
|
|
Post by Gobbledy Demon on Nov 8, 2009 15:48:16 GMT -5
I love how people jump to say Hogans an ass Hogans a duche and all this when you really don't know the guy. He could be the sweetest person around, and you guys act like he is Hitler all over again
|
|
|
|
Post by ritt works hard fo da chickens on Nov 8, 2009 17:23:27 GMT -5
I love how people jump to say Hogans an ass Hogans a duche and all this when you really don't know the guy. He could be the sweetest person around, and you guys act like he is Hitler all over again Having actually known sweet people and seeing how they reacted to tragedy even privately which unfortunately for Hulk this wasn't I can say that I don't think I would call him sweet based on those comments. It's not like someone just decided to make this crap up about Hogan to slander him. He is the one who said it was God's will because of the flaws of this kid, publicly. Once I could understand because maybe he thought there was more privacy to the jailhouse conversation but to repeat it on air is not something a "sweet" person would do. |
|
|
|
Post by Gobbledy Demon on Nov 8, 2009 18:04:55 GMT -5
I love how people jump to say Hogans an ass Hogans a duche and all this when you really don't know the guy. He could be the sweetest person around, and you guys act like he is Hitler all over again Having actually known sweet people and seeing how they reacted to tragedy even privately which unfortunately for Hulk this wasn't I can say that I don't think I would call him sweet based on those comments. It's not like someone just decided to make this crap up about Hogan to slander him. He is the one who said it was God's will because of the flaws of this kid, publicly. Once I could understand because maybe he thought there was more privacy to the jailhouse conversation but to repeat it on air is not something a "sweet" person would do. but but but even Nash and Hall claimed Hogan was just too sweet |
|
|
|
Post by ritt works hard fo da chickens on Nov 8, 2009 20:03:15 GMT -5
but but but even Nash and Hall claimed Hogan was just too sweet I concede this point and admit my argument is rendered moot. |
|
