Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2013 11:07:19 GMT -5
XXVII was the first Mania I watched and afterwards thought "wow that sucked." From the backstage segments that ate up what could have been used for match time, to the lackluster main event. Taker-HHH was the only bright spot, and even that paled in comparison to their XVII match.
|
|
|
Post by froggyfrog on Sept 5, 2013 11:08:20 GMT -5
27, 29, 16. In order
|
|
|
Post by KobashiChop on Sept 5, 2013 11:45:09 GMT -5
27. Only one genuine Mania-standard match, HHH vs Taker. It completly saved the show. Rey and Cody as well as Punk vs Orton were good, but I had stayed up on UK time late for this, and was fuming. Awful time management. And the Rock was insufferable. How you get an idea stadium to pretend to suck a dick and nobody clues in is beyond me.
|
|
|
Post by Baldobomb-22-OH-MAN!!! on Sept 5, 2013 11:49:04 GMT -5
I go with 27. just a rushed, terribly booked show all-around that shat on pretty much every new star they were trying to build at the time (only Cody Rhodes got a victory), a TERRIBLE match between Cole and Lawler that should've lasted like 5 minutes but went for almost a half an hour before Cole WON via shenanigans, and an absolute dog turd of a main event. on top of that, the US title match between Daniel Bryan and Sheamus was cut at the last minute. in fact, I'll go as far as saying Wrestlemania 27 may just be the worst Wrestlemania of all time.
as an aside I liked Wrestlemania 15 and don't get the hate other than the terrible HIAC match.
|
|