|
Post by celticjobber on Sept 6, 2013 0:30:19 GMT -5
Right? It's not like they've been doing that with Cena for years and is one of the major factors of a certain slice of the audience disliking him. Not the same situation at all. Nobody is saying Bryan should come out and squash HHH and co. every week, people just want some type of balance. Yeah, now Daniel Bryan looks like a total jobber. Getting beat down with ease week after week and looking totally pathetic. If I was conspiracy-minded, I'd think this whole thing was designed to fail with the thought that crowds will lose interest after DB is beaten down so handily week-after-week and acting like a jerk to his storyline friends like Big Show. So Vince/Trips and company can toss up their hands and say "we tried" about pushing a new top guy instead of Cena.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2013 0:41:33 GMT -5
Not the same situation at all. Nobody is saying Bryan should come out and squash HHH and co. every week, people just want some type of balance. Yeah, now Daniel Bryan looks like a total jobber. Getting beat down with ease week after week and looking totally pathetic. If I was conspiracy-minded, I'd think this whole thing was designed to fail with the thought that crowds will lose interest after DB is beaten down so handily week-after-week and acting like a jerk to his storyline friends like Big Show. So Vince/Trips and company can toss up their hands and say "we tried" about pushing a new top guy instead of Cena. Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me. Punk and Ryback's heel turns scream deliberate sabotage, and given how thoroughly both of those flopped it wouldn't really surprise me if they decided to instead try and quash Bryan to being midcard-over instead of face of the company-over. If only because the weak link stuff was pretty obviously leading to a heel turn and they just kind of didn't do it, like they suddenly backed out.
|
|