|
Post by Joe Neglia on Dec 7, 2015 19:29:51 GMT -5
But I just prefer going in chronological order. Their Civil War story is happening before their Infinity Gaunlet story. Chronology went out the window quite some time ago.
|
|
|
Post by OGBoardPoster2005 on Dec 7, 2015 19:43:07 GMT -5
But I just prefer going in chronological order. Their Civil War story is happening before their Infinity Gaunlet story. Chronology went out the window quite some time ago. I still prefer character chronology, which they've stuck too.
|
|
Jam
Unicron
Spiral out
Posts: 2,934
|
Post by Jam on Dec 7, 2015 19:47:19 GMT -5
Their Civil War story is happening before their Infinity Gaunlet story. Chronology went out the window quite some time ago. I still prefer character chronology, which they've stuck too. Not exactly. If that were the case, Hank and Janet would have been in the first Avengers movie.
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave is Correct on Dec 7, 2015 19:48:15 GMT -5
I still prefer character chronology, which they've stuck too. Not exactly. If that were the case, Hank and Janet would have been in the first Avengers movie. Also if we're talking about teams... "Guardians of the Galaxy" are the 2000s version and not the 1960s version.
|
|
Jam
Unicron
Spiral out
Posts: 2,934
|
Post by Jam on Dec 7, 2015 20:06:20 GMT -5
Not exactly. If that were the case, Hank and Janet would have been in the first Avengers movie. Also if we're talking about teams... "Guardians of the Galaxy" are the 2000s version and not the 1960s version. When there were just rumors of them doing a Guardians of The Galaxy movie, I was hoping it was going to be about the team from the early 90s. That would have been a really out there movie. They did manage to get Yondu into the one we got. Kind of. Atleast it name and powers anyways. It'd be cool if they introduced a couple of the other OG Guardians in the next movie.
|
|
|
Post by OGBoardPoster2005 on Dec 7, 2015 20:22:39 GMT -5
Not exactly. If that were the case, Hank and Janet would have been in the first Avengers movie. Also if we're talking about teams... "Guardians of the Galaxy" are the 2000s version and not the 1960s version. I'm talking mostly who was the first incarnation of each character. For example, Peter before Miles. They sorta did Hank as Ant Man first but glossed over it.
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave is Correct on Dec 7, 2015 20:29:28 GMT -5
well if we're going chronologically neither Bucky nor Falcon would be the next cap...
it'd be one of the others like Burnside like I mentioned earlier... or like US Agent who became the resident patriot hero when Steve quit.
|
|
Jam
Unicron
Spiral out
Posts: 2,934
|
Post by Jam on Dec 7, 2015 20:32:39 GMT -5
I'm so glad they included Hank Pym as Ant-Man in that movie. The flashback to Hank and Janet as The Wasp was one of my favorite scenes. I hope that Michael Douglas sticks around. He was great and I'd love to see him interact with more of the MCU.
|
|
Jam
Unicron
Spiral out
Posts: 2,934
|
Post by Jam on Dec 7, 2015 20:59:20 GMT -5
youtu.be/l-XLDKu99Q8New featurette. Liking the sound of this movie more and more. The Russo Bros. have got this. Can't wait to see what they do with Infinity War.
|
|
|
Post by Friday Night SmackOwn on Dec 7, 2015 21:14:39 GMT -5
I'm so glad they included Hank Pym as Ant-Man in that movie. The flashback to Hank and Janet as The Wasp was one of my favorite scenes. I hope that Michael Douglas sticks around. He was great and I'd love to see him interact with more of the MCU. As someone who was initially crying foul about the lack of Wasp during the Ant-Man buildup, I thought they did her inclusion really well. The sacrifice Janet makes also creates a neat parallel to Cap's sacrifice, too.
|
|
Jam
Unicron
Spiral out
Posts: 2,934
|
Post by Jam on Dec 7, 2015 21:26:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Joe Neglia on Dec 8, 2015 1:09:14 GMT -5
Also if we're talking about teams... "Guardians of the Galaxy" are the 2000s version and not the 1960s version. I'm talking mostly who was the first incarnation of each character. For example, Peter before Miles. They sorta did Hank as Ant Man first but glossed over it. They skipped 2-3 incarnations of Whiplash to get to the one they used. They're sorta skipping an incarnation or five of Captain Marvel, including the kinda big one it seems.
|
|
Mackenzie Gorn
Don Corleone
I want my personal title back, but I don't know how!
AND THE WAVE OF POSSESIONS DEVOLVE INTO A CHEVY!
Posts: 2,036
|
Post by Mackenzie Gorn on Dec 8, 2015 1:54:50 GMT -5
They skipped a Vision too.
|
|
Legion
Fry's dog Seymour
Amy Pond's #1 fan
Hail Hydra!
Posts: 23,407
|
Post by Legion on Dec 8, 2015 5:51:43 GMT -5
Also if we're talking about teams... "Guardians of the Galaxy" are the 2000s version and not the 1960s version. When there were just rumors of them doing a Guardians of The Galaxy movie, I was hoping it was going to be about the team from the early 90s. That would have been a really out there movie. They did manage to get Yondu into the one we got. Kind of. Atleast it name and powers anyways. It'd be cool if they introduced a couple of the other OG Guardians in the next movie. Starhawk is my pick for father of Starlord. Though that's mainly because the other front runners, Mar-Vell and Adam Warlock, are not developments I want.
|
|
|
Post by OGBoardPoster2005 on Dec 8, 2015 9:33:57 GMT -5
I'm talking mostly who was the first incarnation of each character. For example, Peter before Miles. They sorta did Hank as Ant Man first but glossed over it. They skipped 2-3 incarnations of Whiplash to get to the one they used. They're sorta skipping an incarnation or five of Captain Marvel, including the kinda big one it seems. Fair point. My knowledge of Marvel villains is pale compared to its heroes. Idk, what would Buck do? Just be the Winter Soldier still? I thought I read Stan was signed on for 9 films, this would be his 3rd. Seems like they have a long term plan with him as Cap, but you never know.
|
|
Lupin the Third
Patti Mayonnaise
I'm sorry.....I love you. *boot to the head*--3rd most culpable in the jixing of NXT, D'oh!
Join the Dark Order....
Posts: 36,403
|
Post by Lupin the Third on Dec 12, 2015 13:36:18 GMT -5
But I just prefer going in chronological order. Their Civil War story is happening before their Infinity Gaunlet story. Chronology went out the window quite some time ago. Wibbly Wobbly Timey Wimey!
|
|
|
Post by Friday Night SmackOwn on Dec 12, 2015 18:40:43 GMT -5
But I just prefer going in chronological order. Their Civil War story is happening before their Infinity Gaunlet story. Chronology went out the window quite some time ago. Though it at least makes sense. Governments of the world try to control superheroes, then big bad alien invader obsessed with death descends upon the world, (presumably) forcing every hero active to team up to stop him. Oh, and the world decides that they do need heroes.
|
|
|
Post by sternrogers01 on Dec 21, 2015 13:29:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave is Correct on Dec 21, 2015 13:48:37 GMT -5
He's getting ANOTHER new name... I mean he was Iron Patriot in Iron Man 3...
|
|
|
Post by The Tank on Dec 21, 2015 13:52:34 GMT -5
...I don't know what a Total Film is, but I really hope they f***ed up and that's a typo or a mistake. Because War Hammer is a terrible name for a superhero. Something about War Machine just works in my head. War Hammer sounds like some early Image bullshit.
|
|