Heartbreaker
King Koopa
Is actually Bindi Irwin
RIP Punk's media scrum, Page 54, Muffins, Biting People Bad™ (2022 - 2022)
Posts: 11,846 
|
Post by Heartbreaker on Dec 31, 2014 22:08:35 GMT -5
And Reigns does? Seriously, no storyline? Does the "came back from injury and wanting to win the belt he never lost" not count? That's dandy but as i say above what relevance is Lesnar to that? It'd be the same story if Orton, Cena or anyone else was champion. If you're paying Lesnar the money they'll be he needs to be central to the narrative not just the guy the man on the "comeback journey" happens to need to beat. Reigns vs Lesnar you have a 'has Lesnar met his match?' intrigue. With the storyline you propose Lesnar is just the guy that happens to have the belt at the time. We get it, you don't like Daniel Bryan. The whole act of trying to defend WWE's BS and act like those who want Bryan at Mania are nothing but whiny sheep who should eat shit and enjoy it is so tiresome. There's other members on here who don't like Bryan but do they make such a huge deal and try desperately to prove that he's actually not over? Nope. |
|
Boo!
Dennis Stamp
Posts: 4,417 
|
Post by Boo! on Dec 31, 2014 22:10:55 GMT -5
That's dandy but as i say above what relevance is Lesnar to that? It'd be the same story if Orton, Cena or anyone else was champion. If you're paying Lesnar the money they'll be he needs to be central to the narrative not just the guy the man on the "comeback journey" happens to need to beat. Reigns vs Lesnar you have a 'has Lesnar met his match?' intrigue. With the storyline you propose Lesnar is just the guy that happens to have the belt at the time. We get it, you don't like Daniel Bryan. The whole act of trying to defend WWE's BS and act like those who want Bryan at Mania are nothing but whiny sheep who should eat shit and enjoy it is so tiresome. There's other members on here who don't like Bryan but do they make such a huge deal and try desperately to prove that he's actually not over? Nope. Maybe they just avoid these threads because if they participate they get the "we get it you don't like Bryan", treatment? |
|
|
|
Post by Magic knows Black Lives Matter on Dec 31, 2014 22:13:34 GMT -5
Lesnar would be the big back monster backed by the Authority that no one has beaten and is standing in the way of Bryan from completing his goal of getting the title he never lost back. How is Daniel Bryan coming off his neck injury going to survive, let alone beat, Brock F'N Lesnar, the man who destroyed Cena, Undertaker, and Hunter? Basic, common sense story telling that has been used for ages. That is the story that makes the best use of both. The hatred and refusal to see anything is getting tiring. It's not hatred I have a difference of opinion. Why is that not allowed when it comes to anything Bryan related? Because it comes off like you are arguing for the sake of being a contrarian. Countless people have explained why they feel Bryan should win the Rumble yet you keep spitting out the same tired arguments (with no facts whatsoever backing them up, on top of that) while painting other people as sheep and painting yourself as the victim. |
|
Heartbreaker
King Koopa
Is actually Bindi Irwin
RIP Punk's media scrum, Page 54, Muffins, Biting People Bad™ (2022 - 2022)
Posts: 11,846
|
Post by Heartbreaker on Dec 31, 2014 22:15:44 GMT -5
We get it, you don't like Daniel Bryan. The whole act of trying to defend WWE's BS and act like those who want Bryan at Mania are nothing but whiny sheep who should eat shit and enjoy it is so tiresome. There's other members on here who don't like Bryan but do they make such a huge deal and try desperately to prove that he's actually not over? Nope. Maybe they just avoid these threads because if they participate they get the "we get it you don't like Bryan", treatment? Or maybe they are the type of people who don't want to start flame wars with others? I hate Total Divas but I don't go into the threads, clustering it with my BS and trying to fire up people. |
|
|
|
Post by Mayonnaise on Dec 31, 2014 22:15:49 GMT -5
Lesnar would be the big back monster backed by the Authority that no one has beaten and is standing in the way of Bryan from completing his goal of getting the title he never lost back. How is Daniel Bryan coming off his neck injury going to survive, let alone beat, Brock F'N Lesnar, the man who destroyed Cena, Undertaker, and Hunter? Basic, common sense story telling that has been used for ages. That is the story that makes the best use of both. The hatred and refusal to see anything is getting tiring. It's not hatred I have a difference of opinion. Why is that not allowed when it comes to anything Bryan related? Because it is not difference of opinion. You ignore everything people say, every fact brought up and insult people when you run out of everything else to hide behind. Your opinion amount to nothing more than "I don't like Bryan, I don't like his fans and they need to shut up" you never take the time to try and refute actual points made or argued, you spin it to something else or someone else and cry that you're being persecuted like you're doing right freaking now. So maybe, just maybe people take your "opinions" and destroy them like so many sand castles in tide because you actually have no opinions. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2014 22:16:07 GMT -5
If WWE went with anyone other than Bryan, they're either dumb as f***, and that's why they suck, or they're messing with their audience on purpose. The fans have spoken, much like they did last year, and they want Bryan to win. At Wrestlemania you have the unstoppable beast against the underdog who has returned from a career threatening injury. It's that simple.
|
|
Boo!
Dennis Stamp
Posts: 4,417
|
Post by Boo! on Dec 31, 2014 22:17:38 GMT -5
It's not hatred I have a difference of opinion. Why is that not allowed when it comes to anything Bryan related? Because it comes off like you are being arguing for the sake of being a contrarian. Countless people have explained why they feel Bryan should win the Rumble yet you keep spitting out the same tired arguments (with no facts whatsoever backing them up, on top of that) while painting other people as sheep and painting yourself as the victim. What facts would be sufficient for me to be able to post my opinion that I don't think Bryan vs Lesnar at this moment in time would be the best storyline for Wrestlemania? |
|
Boo!
Dennis Stamp
Posts: 4,417
|
Post by Boo! on Dec 31, 2014 22:20:13 GMT -5
Maybe they just avoid these threads because if they participate they get the "we get it you don't like Bryan", treatment? Or maybe they are the type of people who don't want to start flame wars with others? I hate Total Divas but I don't go into the threads, clustering it with my BS and trying to fire up people. It's as thread discusing WM plans. Are we that over sensitive that unless you agree with the consensus it's 'flaming'? This board is full of people disagreeing over Ambrose, Reigns, Wyatt, Usos, Cesaro - you name it. ONE person (there was someone earlier on too) has a different opinion on Bryan and it's 'flaming'. Maybe the reason why it's only one person is because these threads all go the same way. Any thread about Bryan not treated as an appreciation thread and the outcome is the same. Maybe I'm denser than the others who learned to bite their tongue and simply not participate in them for these reasons. |
|
|
|
Post by Dave the Dave on Dec 31, 2014 22:21:09 GMT -5
Still waiting for how Roman's coming back from injury and his story makes more sense than Bryan doing the same thing.
Did you ignore it cause it can't be spun into a FAN conspiracy holding down different opinions?
|
|
|
|
Post by Magic knows Black Lives Matter on Dec 31, 2014 22:22:04 GMT -5
Because it comes off like you are being arguing for the sake of being a contrarian. Countless people have explained why they feel Bryan should win the Rumble yet you keep spitting out the same tired arguments (with no facts whatsoever backing them up, on top of that) while painting other people as sheep and painting yourself as the victim. What facts would be sufficient for me to be able to post my opinion that I don't think Bryan vs Lesnar at this moment in time would be the best storyline for Wrestlemania? If you personally don't want to see the match, that's fine. But quit trying to come in these threads and paint everyone else that disagree with you as idiots, sheep, or whatever buzzword you want you use. People have explained over and over and over again why they want Bryan to win but you are still talking about the "pre-anointed" one. It comes off really insecure on your part, TBH. It feels like because you are in the minority, you have to try to tear down Bryan fans and "prove them wrong" despite the fact that you are essentially coming into a gun fight with a pocket knife with the arguments that you have brought to the table as to why he shouldn't win. |
|
Heartbreaker
King Koopa
Is actually Bindi Irwin
RIP Punk's media scrum, Page 54, Muffins, Biting People Bad™ (2022 - 2022)
Posts: 11,846
|
Post by Heartbreaker on Dec 31, 2014 22:22:24 GMT -5
Or maybe they are the type of people who don't want to start flame wars with others? I hate Total Divas but I don't go into the threads, clustering it with my BS and trying to fire up people. It's as thread discusing WM plans. Are we that over sensitive that unless you agree with the consensus it's 'flaming'? This board is full of people disagreeing over Ambrose, Reigns, Wyatt, Usos, Cesaro - you name it. ONE person (there was someone earlier on too) has a different opinion on Bryan and it's 'flaming'. Maybe the reason why it's only one person is because these threads all go the same way. Any thread about Bryan not treated as an appreciation thread and the outcome is the same. Maybe I'm denser than the others who learned to bite their tongue and simply not participate in them for these reasons. There's a difference between having an opinion and hijacking threads like you clearly always do. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2014 22:24:01 GMT -5
We are ignoring the important question here - How big is Batista's dick?
|
|
|
|
Post by Magic knows Black Lives Matter on Dec 31, 2014 22:25:14 GMT -5
We are ignoring the important question here - How big is Batista's dick? Smaller than Roman's because Batista needs to put him over strong. ...Man, I told myself I wasn't gonna use that meme. What is this thread doing to me? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2014 22:25:45 GMT -5
I'm not a big fan of this quote:
"Has the season where wrestling fans become suicidal emo teens already snuck upon us? The year goes so quickly, doesn't it?"
When 1. There's a story about a transgendered teen committing suicide in the news at the moment.
and
2. We have a board member on the verge of death right now.
Call me overly sensitive but not liking that quote.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dave the Dave on Dec 31, 2014 22:26:04 GMT -5
We are ignoring the important question here - How big is Batista's dick? Still pissed CM Punk wouldn't tell me. |
|
Boo!
Dennis Stamp
Posts: 4,417
|
Post by Boo! on Dec 31, 2014 22:27:03 GMT -5
I'm not a big fan of this quote: "Has the season where wrestling fans become suicidal emo teens already snuck upon us? The year goes so quickly, doesn't it?" When 1. There's a story about a transgendered teen committing suicide in the news at the moment. and 2. We have a board member on the verge of death right now. Call me overly sensitive but not liking that quote. I apologise, I had no idea. |
|
|
|
Post by Mayonnaise on Dec 31, 2014 22:27:30 GMT -5
Or maybe they are the type of people who don't want to start flame wars with others? I hate Total Divas but I don't go into the threads, clustering it with my BS and trying to fire up people. It's as thread discusing WM plans. Are we that over sensitive that unless you agree with the consensus it's 'flaming'? This board is full of people disagreeing over Ambrose, Reigns, Wyatt, Usos, Cesaro - you name it. ONE person (there was someone earlier on too) has a different opinion on Bryan and it's 'flaming'. Maybe the reason why it's only one person is because these threads all go the same way. Any thread about Bryan not treated as an appreciation thread and the outcome is the same. Maybe I'm denser than the others who learned to bite their tongue and simply not participate in them for these reasons. This...this is why no one believe you when you talk about how you're not a troll Has the season where wrestling fans become suicidal emo teens already snuck upon us? The year goes so quickly, doesn't it? You act like this and people will see you as a troll because you're acting like one. Come in and have a good idea and it works, someone was talking about preferring Dolph earlier with no issues. Someone talked about how Roman might be the better choice because of age and he wasn't attack, he just had his facts checked and asked to explain himself which if he didn't someone else did. Notice the theme there, they didn't call people "suicidal emo teens" and act like a damned troll. |
|
|
|
Post by Magic knows Black Lives Matter on Dec 31, 2014 22:28:02 GMT -5
I'm not a big fan of this quote: "Has the season where wrestling fans become suicidal emo teens already snuck upon us? The year goes so quickly, doesn't it?" When 1. There's a story about a transgendered teen committing suicide in the news at the moment. and 2. We have a board member on the verge of death right now. Call me overly sensitive but not liking that quote. That transgendered teen lived in my city and the death actually hits kinda close to home so yeah I wasn't a fan of that either but I kept my mouth shut and assumed that the mods would take care of it in time. |
|
|
|
Post by Magic knows Black Lives Matter on Dec 31, 2014 22:31:13 GMT -5
Can we really call Daniel Bryan a star if he hasn't wrestled at Bound For Glory? That's the real question here. On that basis, I nominate that Christian gets the title match at Mania. He loses after Brock forces him to tap with a vicious handshake.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2014 22:31:52 GMT -5
We are ignoring the important question here - How big is Batista's dick? Smaller than Roman's because Batista needs to put him over strong. ...Man, I told myself I wasn't gonna use that meme. What is this thread doing to me? Batista v Reigns with Renee Young holding the tape measure as WM31 main event = female Network subscription rate doubling. |
|
