Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2015 13:57:57 GMT -5
I like the Big Show.
Calling him Paul Wight is weird though.
|
|
CMWaters
Ozymandius
Rolled a Seven, Beat the Ads.
Bald and busy
Posts: 63,363 
|
Post by CMWaters on Sept 7, 2015 13:59:32 GMT -5
Just realized, we can also have: Old UFC  vs. New UFC  |
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Sept 7, 2015 14:01:42 GMT -5
Did they really need a second version of the Big Show?  Yes, because he had a vastly different moveset when he debuted. If he was just an alt attire, 1999 Big Show would still have the knockout punch as a finisher, have a spear as a signature move, the cobra clutch backbreaker, etc. Separate slots are necessary when movesets get involved. |
|
|
|
Post by The Heartbreak TWERK on Sept 7, 2015 14:05:38 GMT -5
I hope that's it for the Attitude Era/Legends roster, to be honest I was disappointed by the lack of current guys in this week's reveal.
|
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Sept 7, 2015 14:11:24 GMT -5
Did they really need a second version of the Big Show? Yes, because he had a vastly different moveset when he debuted. If he was just an alt attire, 1999 Big Show would still have the knockout punch as a finisher, have a spear as a signature move, the cobra clutch backbreaker, etc. Separate slots are necessary when movesets get involved. Don't all of the game characters have a more expansive moveset than what they actually do in real life? One character could have all the moves from both personas. And don't all the game characters have two finishers where Big Show could have both the knockout punch AND the chokeslam? |
|
Bang Bang Bart
Ozymandius
The King of North America
just more of me to love, honey.
Posts: 62,059
Member is Online
|
Post by Bang Bang Bart on Sept 7, 2015 14:12:04 GMT -5
I like the Big Show. Calling him Paul Wight is weird though. That's what they called him when he debuted in WWE, then "Big Nasty" Paul Wight, then finally onto Big Show. |
|
CMWaters
Ozymandius
Rolled a Seven, Beat the Ads.
Bald and busy
Posts: 63,363
|
Post by CMWaters on Sept 7, 2015 14:12:49 GMT -5
Did they really need a second version of the Big Show? Yes, because he had a vastly different moveset when he debuted. If he was just an alt attire, 1999 Big Show would still have the knockout punch as a finisher, have a spear as a signature move, the cobra clutch backbreaker, etc. Separate slots are necessary when movesets get involved. Hoping if that's the reasoning, sorry for those who want a newer person, that classic Sting is one of the final reveals. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2015 14:17:44 GMT -5
I like the Big Show. Calling him Paul Wight is weird though. That's what they called him when he debuted in WWE, then "Big Nasty" Paul Wight, then finally onto Big Show. Oh, I know, I just meant in general it's still weird to me. |
|
|
|
Post by "Mr Wonderdick" Dick Dastardly on Sept 7, 2015 14:19:49 GMT -5
Yes, because he had a vastly different moveset when he debuted. If he was just an alt attire, 1999 Big Show would still have the knockout punch as a finisher, have a spear as a signature move, the cobra clutch backbreaker, etc. Separate slots are necessary when movesets get involved. Hoping if that's the reasoning, sorry for those who want a newer person, that classic Sting is one of the final reveals. They aren't going to announce an alternate Sting, since it would pretty much be considered a duplicate. |
|
CMWaters
Ozymandius
Rolled a Seven, Beat the Ads.
Bald and busy
Posts: 63,363
|
Post by CMWaters on Sept 7, 2015 14:21:25 GMT -5
Hoping if that's the reasoning, sorry for those who want a newer person, that classic Sting is one of the final reveals. They aren't going to announce an alternate Sting, since it would pretty much be considered a duplicate. But if we go by the Big Show/Paul Wight reasoning, different movesets and stats (remember, Classic Sting didn't have the Scorpion Death Drop, for one). |
|
|
|
Post by thetower52 on Sept 7, 2015 14:36:56 GMT -5
Any screen shots yet or is the IGN article still f***ed?
|
|
CMWaters
Ozymandius
Rolled a Seven, Beat the Ads.
Bald and busy
Posts: 63,363
|
Post by CMWaters on Sept 7, 2015 14:39:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by "Gentleman" AJ Powell on Sept 7, 2015 14:42:24 GMT -5
Hope they give Shamrock a better Ankle Lock this time. I.E one that actually counts as a submissions.
|
|
|
|
Post by thetower52 on Sept 7, 2015 14:47:11 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2015 14:48:44 GMT -5
Who do you all think will be for dlc?
|
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Sept 7, 2015 14:50:01 GMT -5
^If Alex Riley isn't AT LEAST DLC, I will be pissed. I think it would be a dick move to end all dick moves if literally EVERYONE is in the game except him.
|
|
|
|
Post by thetower52 on Sept 7, 2015 14:51:52 GMT -5
Who do you all think will be for dlc? Dudley boyz Samoa Joe, and legends but it depends on who the rest of the roster is |
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Snips on Sept 7, 2015 14:52:39 GMT -5
Have they announced Road Dogg yet or we can just assume him for the last reveal?
|
|
|
|
Post by thetower52 on Sept 7, 2015 14:56:14 GMT -5
Have they announced Road Dogg yet or we can just assume him for the last reveal? No announcement yet for him, but with billy in I'm sure he's in. I really hope the outlaws actually get a tag intro this year unlike in wwe 13 where the outlaws and APA had generic intros |
|
|
|
Post by MAD TITAN on Sept 7, 2015 15:07:38 GMT -5
They aren't going to announce an alternate Sting, since it would pretty much be considered a duplicate. But if we go by the Big Show/Paul Wight reasoning, different movesets and stats (remember, Classic Sting didn't have the Scorpion Death Drop, for one). Sting has always been called Sting. Sure the gimmicks are different. Same reason why SES CM Punk is still CM Punk. |
|
