Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2019 3:03:50 GMT -5
Pass. A Doctor Who movie that’s completely separate from any Who canon? Not interested. It would end up feeling like a knock off. It would be like making War of Stars, with Duke Airunner and Dan Bolo. Even if you do everything exactly the same, it still wouldn’t feel right. Won't be first time, there was 2 doctor who movies from the 60s that were like that.
|
|
|
Post by The Summer of Muskrat XVII on Oct 27, 2019 3:09:37 GMT -5
Pass. A Doctor Who movie that’s completely separate from any Who canon? Not interested. It would end up feeling like a knock off. It would be like making War of Stars, with Duke Airunner and Dan Bolo. Even if you do everything exactly the same, it still wouldn’t feel right. Won't be first time, there was 2 doctor who movies from the 60s that were like that. Oh, I’m aware. At least when they came out in the 60’s, Who was still pretty new so they could’ve gotten away with it a lot easier. Never seen them, but I hear that even with Peter Cushing they aren’t particularly good.
|
|
|
Post by thechase on Oct 27, 2019 3:51:28 GMT -5
Won't be first time, there was 2 doctor who movies from the 60s that were like that. Oh, I’m aware. At least when they came out in the 60’s, Who was still pretty new so they could’ve gotten away with it a lot easier. Never seen them, but I hear that even with Peter Cushing they aren’t particularly good. I find them quite fun actually. Has Roy 'Record Breakers' Castle as Ian in one.
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave on Oct 27, 2019 14:30:28 GMT -5
the Dr. Who movies (that's how they bill him) are alright.
They are not great but they're ok.
|
|
|
Post by eJm on Oct 27, 2019 15:15:20 GMT -5
We Got It Covered are pretty sketchy as a source, They’re the site whose source for some stuff was literal links to their past articles, right? If so, that literally disqualified them from anything.
|
|
|
Post by thechase on Feb 16, 2020 7:00:31 GMT -5
|
|