|
Post by Captain Stud Muffin (BLM) on Jan 31, 2020 20:48:36 GMT -5
Yea, I can see them taking some pointers from Game of Thrones in terms of reducing the characters and fixing up some things but keeping the core story the same One Piece has a lot of damn story to use so they should be good in that regard Taking pointers from Game of Thrones is the last thing they should do after the disaster it turned out to be.
If they need actresses, I nominate Melissa McCarthy for Fat Alvida
Last few seasons withstanding, they were on the right path when they had source material to work off of
|
|
|
Post by Mandarin Dessert Version 0 on Feb 1, 2020 0:39:21 GMT -5
Reading all the comments here and thinking about that arc again...I do have to agree that the Skypiea Arc feels like a filler arc considering that its only lasting impression is introducing the dials that Usopp and Nami would use during the course of the show. Otherwise, you could go from the end of the Alabasta Arc directly to the Water 7 Arc without losing much. Though I guess Oda thought that an arc in between was needed to develop a connection between the crew and Nico Robin, otherwise, why should any of them give any flying feather about her turning evil again immediately? Now pondering whether people know that the Skypiea Arc was an actual arc in the manga and not just an anime filler arc... Skypiea is much easier to get through in the manga, and is really appreciated by fans in retrospect. It gives introspection to Haki, void century, “D”, without saying it and actually gives the biggest hint to what the actual One Piece treasure likely is. Not denouncing the arc for giving those hints and when I watched it some two years ago, I liked it well enough. Just wanted to point out why people might see it as a filler arc.
|
|