Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2020 18:23:57 GMT -5
Sounds like there's quite a bit of history here. The original accuser posted some screenshots from June last year from Riddle and his wife which seem to suggest they were still having some kind of affair. So Riddle was either sleeping with his stalker or she was having an affair with a guy who once raped her over a year previously (neither of which are impossible I guess). Or somewhere in between. What I do know is anyone who thinks they know for sure one way or another is lying. And so anyone giving her shit on Twitter - and there are many by the looks of it - is totally out of order. Not uncommon for rape victims to still see their abuser afterwards. That's the nature of relationships of abuse and where the power dynamics are so skewed.
|
|
markymark
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,162
Member is Online
|
Post by markymark on Jun 19, 2020 18:38:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Display Name on Jun 19, 2020 18:47:57 GMT -5
I like these people that think they’re saints, when they’re willingly sleeping with married people.
|
|
|
Post by 3cheers4ramirez on Jun 19, 2020 19:02:52 GMT -5
Sounds like there's quite a bit of history here. The original accuser posted some screenshots from June last year from Riddle and his wife which seem to suggest they were still having some kind of affair. So Riddle was either sleeping with his stalker or she was having an affair with a guy who once raped her over a year previously (neither of which are impossible I guess). Or somewhere in between. What I do know is anyone who thinks they know for sure one way or another is lying. And so anyone giving her shit on Twitter - and there are many by the looks of it - is totally out of order. Not uncommon for rape victims to still see their abuser afterwards. That's the nature of relationships of abuse and where the power dynamics are so skewed. I totally agree, and I did reference that in my post. But it definitely clouds the case, in both directions, given this is an isolated incident with no other evidence. FWIW I believe her side of events, but that's not enough to kill someones career.
|
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Jun 19, 2020 19:22:55 GMT -5
I feel like people shouldn't mix judgment of the rape allegations with judgment of the adultery as I'm seeing a bit online. Not defending it, but cheating is still merely a personal issue that can and should be handled between the parties involved. Rape is a straight up crime, one of the most disgusting ones that can be committed. So I guess it's just a bit weird to see people coming out saying "look he cheats on his wife, what an asshole" when we should be focusing 100% on the assault allegations.
|
|
|
Post by Tenshigure on Jun 19, 2020 21:14:45 GMT -5
I like these people that think they’re saints, when they’re willingly sleeping with married people. Completely irrelevant to the accusation, and it takes two to tango so let's not "Scarlet Letter" the accused, shall we?
|
|
|
Post by Display Name on Jun 19, 2020 21:19:26 GMT -5
I like these people that think they’re saints, when they’re willingly sleeping with married people. Completely irrelevant to the accusation, and it takes two to tango so let's not "Scarlet Letter" the accused, shall we? You made my point. It takes two to tango.
|
|
Tom Turkey
Ozymandius
The King of North America
Posts: 61,992
Member is Online
|
Post by Tom Turkey on Jun 19, 2020 21:23:23 GMT -5
So... the answer to whether or not WWE would edit Riddle out due to the allegations was... a big hard “No”.
Which meant that we got Riddle debuting vs. AJ Styles and having a big celebration after his win... which is super mega awkward.
|
|
|
Post by Topher is Human on Jun 19, 2020 21:27:22 GMT -5
Completely irrelevant to the accusation, and it takes two to tango so let's not "Scarlet Letter" the accused, shall we? You made my point. It takes two to tango. Yeah... let’s not go down this path. Doing one wrong thing doesn’t suddenly change the gravity of the other. In fact you could argue that the point you’re trying to make is completely irrelevant to the actually topic at hand and all it appears to be doing is trying to hurt the credibility of their story despite the irrelevance. So yeah, let’s not.
|
|
|
Post by Oh Cry Me a Screwball on Jun 19, 2020 21:30:03 GMT -5
So... the answer to whether or not WWE would edit Riddle out due to the allegations was... a big hard “No”. Which meant that we got Riddle debuting vs. AJ Styles and having a big celebration after his win... which is super mega awkward. I mean, Jack Gallagher is literally on 205 Live right now, and they actually let him go.
|
|
|
Post by Tenshigure on Jun 19, 2020 21:31:24 GMT -5
Completely irrelevant to the accusation, and it takes two to tango so let's not "Scarlet Letter" the accused, shall we? You made my point. It takes two to tango. Not one of these people coming forward is claiming they are saints, and again you are implying the character of the (alleged) victim should be put into consideration, like being involved in an adulterous relationship somehow invalidates the sexual assault. No, she may not be a saint, but that doesn't mean she isn't due the common decency and respect of not being taken advantage of like that.
|
|
|
Post by arrogantmodel on Jun 19, 2020 21:45:25 GMT -5
WWE:
🙉 Then
🙊 Now
🙈 Forever
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2020 21:55:37 GMT -5
This whole thing seriously just reads to me as WWE firing Gallagher because they saw him as expendable for a, "See, we're taking it seriously!" message while ignoring people like Riddle, Devlin, and Dream. Basically doing something to have something to point to that they're taking it seriously even while not actually doing so.
|
|
Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-]
FANatic
Writer, Lover of all things Wrestling. Analytical, Critical, Lovable (hopefully). Lets all have fun!
Posts: 247,687
|
Post by Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-] on Jun 19, 2020 21:59:15 GMT -5
This whole thing seriously just reads to me as WWE firing Gallagher because they saw him as expendable for a, "See, we're taking it seriously!" message while ignoring people like Riddle, Devlin, and Dream. Basically doing something to have something to point to that they're taking it seriously even while not actually doing so. Depends. The Dream stuff I believe was debunked. The others might be a matter of investigating everything. I think Gallagher either admitted to it or they found condemning evidence and the same might be felt in the coming days. If not, they absolutely will have to answer for it.
|
|
|
Post by Oh Cry Me a Screwball on Jun 19, 2020 22:04:51 GMT -5
This whole thing seriously just reads to me as WWE firing Gallagher because they saw him as expendable for a, "See, we're taking it seriously!" message while ignoring people like Riddle, Devlin, and Dream. Basically doing something to have something to point to that they're taking it seriously even while not actually doing so. Depends. The Dream stuff I believe was debunked. The others might be a matter of investigating everything. I think Gallagher either admitted to it or they found condemning evidence and the same might be felt in the coming days. If not, they absolutely will have to answer for it. Well, there's new Dream stuff that has me reconsidering any doubt I had for the previous accusation. Also, it doesn't much sense to consider Gallagher as more disposable than the NXT UK guys, because NXT UK isn't exactly above 205 Live in anyway. In fact, Gallagher has the advantage of being available to WWE during the pandemic, whereas firing anyone across the border would have zero effect on the current product.
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Workin On My Night Cheese on Jun 19, 2020 22:08:13 GMT -5
So... the answer to whether or not WWE would edit Riddle out due to the allegations was... a big hard “No”. Which meant that we got Riddle debuting vs. AJ Styles and having a big celebration after his win... which is super mega awkward. He fought Styles, so I guess that means he interrupted Styles’s big promo too. And I bet it was a nice long match too. On the other hand, that may be his only appearance until this either blows over or he gets cut, since they’ve yet to tape next week’s SmackDown.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2020 22:20:56 GMT -5
NXT guys keep surpassing 80s wrestlers in crazy scale. :S
|
|
|
Post by Captain Stud Muffin (BLM) on Jun 19, 2020 22:22:32 GMT -5
I feel like people shouldn't mix judgment of the rape allegations with judgment of the adultery as I'm seeing a bit online. Not defending it, but cheating is still merely a personal issue that can and should be handled between the parties involved. Rape is a straight up crime, one of the most disgusting ones that can be committed. So I guess it's just a bit weird to see people coming out saying "look he cheats on his wife, what an asshole" when we should be focusing 100% on the assault allegations. Agreed. If he cheats on his wife, honestly so what. It is wrong but that doesn't make him a monster The rape allegations is what needs the attention because if that is true, that is where the monster is. No real point in going down the road of he cheated so he's an ass because that's not the elephant in the room
|
|
|
Post by The Captain on Jun 19, 2020 22:26:02 GMT -5
Intimate partner rape is still rape. Spousal rape is still rape. Just because there were also consensual encounters doesn't mean a sexual assault didn't happen.
|
|
Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-]
FANatic
Writer, Lover of all things Wrestling. Analytical, Critical, Lovable (hopefully). Lets all have fun!
Posts: 247,687
|
Post by Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-] on Jun 19, 2020 22:31:37 GMT -5
Depends. The Dream stuff I believe was debunked. The others might be a matter of investigating everything. I think Gallagher either admitted to it or they found condemning evidence and the same might be felt in the coming days. If not, they absolutely will have to answer for it. Well, there's new Dream stuff that has me reconsidering any doubt I had for the previous accusation. Also, it doesn't much sense to consider Gallagher as more disposable than the NXT UK guys, because NXT UK isn't exactly above 205 Live in anyway. In fact, Gallagher has the advantage of being available to WWE during the pandemic, whereas firing anyone across the border would have zero effect on the current product. I did not hear about the new Dream stuff, was the original thread updated or a new one started? And yeah I don't think this is a statement cut, Gallagher is in no way more expendable than Coffey, Ligero, Banks or Devlin to me
|
|