|
Post by "Evil Brood" Jackson Vanik on Apr 23, 2022 22:21:42 GMT -5
Just out of curiousity, what definition are we using as a horrible person? What determines who's good, bad, or in between? I mean, I can understand if somebody classifies Dynamite Kid or Fritz Von as a scumbag given all the shit they did over the years, but what about those who are less sleazy and done some good? Vince McMahon did alot of shady shit in the 80s when he took his business National, but he also did some nice things like get jobs for Tony Atlas and Iron Sheik when they were done on their luck or pay for Paul Bearer's gastric bypass. I'm sure he's done other redeeming things too. What would that classify him as? Hell, IWC whipping boy Hulk Hogan has donated to charities. Does all his backstage politicing and other shady escapades negate that? I just feel with some people, the lines can be blurred between good and bad at times you don't know which way to turn. Yes. Everyone has good and bad qualities. Everyone has done horrible shit. This is the Internet, it’s for piling on people and pretending you’re perfect. Well yes, people are complex so I am generally hesitant to label someone bad on face. But there are cases where it's justified and I think saying everyone has done horrible shit is a bit exaggerated. Like take Hogan for example. I am sure he has done some nice things. But he's also a racist. And not just like a dude with some prejudice who doesn't think the N word is that big of a deal kind of racist. He's the kind of racist who has problems with his white daughter sleeping with black men. Like yeah, that probably does outweigh a lot of the goof stuff he's done.
|
|