|
|
Post by markymark on Oct 8, 2024 9:58:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by jean0987654321 on Oct 8, 2024 13:41:48 GMT -5
I wouldn't be surprised if those NDAs get tossed out by the judge and if they do, Vince will have more problems to deal with than just Grant
|
|
|
|
Post by Baldobomb-22-OH-MAN!!! on Oct 8, 2024 18:53:49 GMT -5
Oh god he pooped on other people, didn't he?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mighty Attack Tribble on Oct 8, 2024 19:24:20 GMT -5
Oh god he pooped on other people, didn't he?  We'll find out this wasn't stunt poop. |
|
|
|
Post by markymark on Oct 15, 2024 8:18:54 GMT -5
|
|
PKO
King Koopa
Posts: 12,654
|
Post by PKO on Oct 15, 2024 8:42:38 GMT -5
Oh god he pooped on other people, didn't he? We'll find out this wasn't stunt poop. I’ve said it before but it’s horrible to look back and realise that every one of the top women from the past 20+ years had some sort of segment where they got slopped or humiliated. |
|
|
|
Post by markymark on Oct 29, 2024 18:16:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ChitownKnight on Nov 9, 2024 15:32:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Feargus McReddit on Nov 11, 2024 8:24:12 GMT -5
Not to go deeply into all of that but from what I'm seeing from people who'd know better, there first would need to be a charge to be placed and a conviction to happen before any of that can actually happen, right? Because doing it right now, best case scenario, would be the administration basically going "This guy did things he hasn't been officially charged for but he's pardoned anyway" and if anything that's almost as bad as overturning a conviction because at least with that, it implies he's been wrongfully convicted of a crime. EDIT: And with how long these things go, it would be closer to the next election cycle if anything. The P Diddy stuff is going to keep running for years for sure before a conviction is given for example. |
|
|
|
Post by Jedi-El of Tomorrow on Nov 11, 2024 9:09:36 GMT -5
Not to go deeply into all of that but from what I'm seeing from people who'd know better, there first would need to be a charge to be placed and a conviction to happen before any of that can actually happen, right? Because doing it right now, best case scenario, would be the administration basically going "This guy did things he hasn't been officially charged for but he's pardoned anyway" and if anything that's almost as bad as overturning a conviction because at least with that, it implies he's been wrongfully convicted of a crime. EDIT: And with how long these things go, it would be closer to the next election cycle if anything. The P Diddy stuff is going to keep running for years for sure before a conviction is given for example. Conviction isn't needed. I hope this doesn't break rules, but Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon, despite Nixon never being convicted or even indicted. |
|
|
|
Post by Feargus McReddit on Nov 11, 2024 9:40:01 GMT -5
Not to go deeply into all of that but from what I'm seeing from people who'd know better, there first would need to be a charge to be placed and a conviction to happen before any of that can actually happen, right? Because doing it right now, best case scenario, would be the administration basically going "This guy did things he hasn't been officially charged for but he's pardoned anyway" and if anything that's almost as bad as overturning a conviction because at least with that, it implies he's been wrongfully convicted of a crime. EDIT: And with how long these things go, it would be closer to the next election cycle if anything. The P Diddy stuff is going to keep running for years for sure before a conviction is given for example. Conviction isn't needed. I hope this doesn't break rules, but Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon, despite Nixon never being convicted or even indicted. Ahh, gotcha. Figured I was missing something completely. |
|
lucas_lee
Hank Scorpio
Heel turn is finished, now stripping away my personality
Posts: 7,035
|
Post by lucas_lee on Nov 11, 2024 10:57:01 GMT -5
Not to go deeply into all of that but from what I'm seeing from people who'd know better, there first would need to be a charge to be placed and a conviction to happen before any of that can actually happen, right? Because doing it right now, best case scenario, would be the administration basically going "This guy did things he hasn't been officially charged for but he's pardoned anyway" and if anything that's almost as bad as overturning a conviction because at least with that, it implies he's been wrongfully convicted of a crime. EDIT: And with how long these things go, it would be closer to the next election cycle if anything. The P Diddy stuff is going to keep running for years for sure before a conviction is given for example. Conviction isn't needed. I hope this doesn't break rules, but Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon, despite Nixon never being convicted or even indicted. But it wouldn't negate the civil trial where all of the dirty laundry will be aired. So get ****ed Vince. |
|
Legion
Fry's dog Seymour
Amy Pond's #1 fan
Hail Hydra!
Posts: 23,509
|
Post by Legion on Nov 11, 2024 11:33:04 GMT -5
With the federal investigation, I now fully expect that to just go away quietly.
With the civil suit, I can see a settlement on the horizon. That's guaranteed money for Ms Grant any other credible individual, rather than go to trial and be painted as a gold digger at a time when public opinion seems to be not where public opinion 'should' be, given pendulums swinging backwards in some areas - which is likely more trouble than it's worth ultimately when the money will be right there.
Granted Ms Grant may be stronger than I would be and be willing to fight it out, but everything about her lawyer screams they want a big settlement, so I say that's where it goes.
|
|
