vaderbomb91
ALF
South Park's Mel Gibson > you.
Posts: 1,167
|
Post by vaderbomb91 on Feb 24, 2007 11:51:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by "American Cream" Dusty Loads on Feb 24, 2007 11:55:58 GMT -5
I think the only one they're not allowed to show is the scratch logo for some reason.
|
|
odor31
Unicron
The Stunner Collector
Posts: 3,240
|
Post by odor31 on Feb 24, 2007 11:55:59 GMT -5
You can have the old logo, just not the scratch.
|
|
|
Post by Arturo Classico on Feb 24, 2007 11:56:22 GMT -5
No they are allowed to use the old WWF logo. The scratch logo is not allowed. Also they can't use the initials WWF. They just use that logo for DVD's.
|
|
|
Post by Harmonica on Feb 24, 2007 12:01:08 GMT -5
are they going to do this with all wrestlemanias' what is the point in getting the anthology
|
|
|
Post by Lenny: Smooth like Keith Stone on Feb 24, 2007 12:01:18 GMT -5
Me and my buddies have watched a lot of WWF/E DVD's over the past year, and the following seems to be the rules that they follow: * The WWF scratch logo is always blurred out. * The classic WWF logo is allowed to remain, although they did change even the classic logo for the current "WWE legends" logo that we see. * They can say World Wrestling Federation all they want, just not the initials WWF. * Apparently Hulk Hogan's theme song was ALWAYS Real American, even in the days when he used the Jimi Hendrix song. My senile memory tried to tell me otherwise, but the WWE revisionist royalty-free history set me straight.
|
|
vaderbomb91
ALF
South Park's Mel Gibson > you.
Posts: 1,167
|
Post by vaderbomb91 on Feb 24, 2007 12:03:54 GMT -5
Thanks everyone; I did not know that. If that's the case, could they edit the classic logo into the corner of the screen in Attitude-era footage instead of just blurring out the late 90's logo? It'd look a hell of a lot better IMO...
|
|
|
Post by careless on Feb 24, 2007 12:05:45 GMT -5
I understand the lawsuit, I guess. But why can they never show the WWF logo in the past as it was before the dispute?
|
|
bigHEADinc
El Dandy
Wanted Conway Twitty as a special title.
lest we forget...
Posts: 7,711
|
Post by bigHEADinc on Feb 24, 2007 13:27:50 GMT -5
Me and my buddies have watched a lot of WWF/E DVD's over the past year, and the following seems to be the rules that they follow: * The WWF scratch logo is always blurred out. * The classic WWF logo is allowed to remain, although they did change even the classic logo for the current "WWE legends" logo that we see. * They can say World Wrestling Federation all they want, just not the initials WWF. * Apparently Hulk Hogan's theme song was ALWAYS Real American, even in the days when he used the Jimi Hendrix song. My senile memory tried to tell me otherwise, but the WWE revisionist royalty-free history set me straight. Just a question... Why does everybody care so much about what entrance music a guy uses in a video that's years (to decades) old? It just doesn't make sense to me, since I tend to turn off entrances in the wrestling games and fast forward through longer entrances in matches anywyas...
|
|
|
Post by Banned Member on Feb 24, 2007 15:01:00 GMT -5
Me and my buddies have watched a lot of WWF/E DVD's over the past year, and the following seems to be the rules that they follow: * The WWF scratch logo is always blurred out. * The classic WWF logo is allowed to remain, although they did change even the classic logo for the current "WWE legends" logo that we see. * They can say World Wrestling Federation all they want, just not the initials WWF. * Apparently Hulk Hogan's theme song was ALWAYS Real American, even in the days when he used the Jimi Hendrix song. My senile memory tried to tell me otherwise, but the WWE revisionist royalty-free history set me straight. Just a question... Why does everybody care so much about what entrance music a guy uses in a video that's years (to decades) old? It just doesn't make sense to me, since I tend to turn off entrances in the wrestling games and fast forward through longer entrances in matches anywyas... It wouldn't be as bad if the music was well in sync with the cowrd, and commenataters. Its always blasting way to loud.
|
|
|
Post by A Magician Named SHAKE on Feb 24, 2007 15:17:30 GMT -5
I was walking past this women's clothing store with my girlfriend in the mall the other day and I swear to god they had the WWF panda logo on a t-shirt. Who the bloody hell buys that shirt??
So I thought to myself, "Hmm, I could set the building on fire". [/Milton Waddams]
|
|
|
Post by lildude8218 on Feb 24, 2007 15:52:26 GMT -5
Me and my buddies have watched a lot of WWF/E DVD's over the past year, and the following seems to be the rules that they follow: * The WWF scratch logo is always blurred out. * The classic WWF logo is allowed to remain, although they did change even the classic logo for the current "WWE legends" logo that we see. * They can say World Wrestling Federation all they want, just not the initials WWF. * Apparently Hulk Hogan's theme song was ALWAYS Real American, even in the days when he used the Jimi Hendrix song. My senile memory tried to tell me otherwise, but the WWE revisionist royalty-free history set me straight. Just a question... Why does everybody care so much about what entrance music a guy uses in a video that's years (to decades) old? It just doesn't make sense to me, since I tend to turn off entrances in the wrestling games and fast forward through longer entrances in matches anywyas... The same reason people complain about Sandman not coming out to "Enter Sandman" or New Jack coming out to "Natural Born Killaz" on the ECW DVDs......... yeah i don't know either. Seriously, they could just cue up their stereo if they really want to.
|
|
|
Post by brutuscheesecake on Feb 24, 2007 16:23:43 GMT -5
What the hell did the World Wildlife Fund get out of this anyway. Does anybody associate WWF with them? does anybody care about them?
|
|
|
Post by skskillz on Feb 24, 2007 17:12:04 GMT -5
Just a question... Why does everybody care so much about what entrance music a guy uses in a video that's years (to decades) old? It just doesn't make sense to me, since I tend to turn off entrances in the wrestling games and fast forward through longer entrances in matches anywyas... Because it's part of the history of the character and event. If Randy Savage came out to a generic rock song instead of Pomp and Circumstance, it would be distorting that time period and character. A theme song is just as much a part of the show as the match is. Imagine Steve Austin coming out to Red Rooster's music. Probably not going to bring back any nostalgic memories for people down the road.
|
|
Hiroshi Hase
Patti Mayonnaise
The Good Ol' Days
Posts: 30,755
|
Post by Hiroshi Hase on Feb 24, 2007 17:15:11 GMT -5
Me and my buddies have watched a lot of WWF/E DVD's over the past year, and the following seems to be the rules that they follow: * The WWF scratch logo is always blurred out. * The classic WWF logo is allowed to remain, although they did change even the classic logo for the current "WWE legends" logo that we see. * They can say World Wrestling Federation all they want, just not the initials WWF. * Apparently Hulk Hogan's theme song was ALWAYS Real American, even in the days when he used the Jimi Hendrix song. My senile memory tried to tell me otherwise, but the WWE revisionist royalty-free history set me straight. Just a question... Why does everybody care so much about what entrance music a guy uses in a video that's years (to decades) old? It just doesn't make sense to me, since I tend to turn off entrances in the wrestling games and fast forward through longer entrances in matches anywyas... Well different strokes for different folks, for me personally I'm a huge fan of wrestling themes, so yes it does matter if a person comes out with a completely different theme from which they had previously. Doesn't matter as I have already gotten most of the wrestling PPV's while they aired live, but that's my answer on it, to you it may not matter but to others it does.
|
|
|
Post by Bob Schlapowitz on Feb 24, 2007 18:46:20 GMT -5
Me and my buddies have watched a lot of WWF/E DVD's over the past year, and the following seems to be the rules that they follow: * The WWF scratch logo is always blurred out. * The classic WWF logo is allowed to remain, although they did change even the classic logo for the current "WWE legends" logo that we see. * They can say World Wrestling Federation all they want, just not the initials WWF. * Apparently Hulk Hogan's theme song was ALWAYS Real American, even in the days when he used the Jimi Hendrix song. My senile memory tried to tell me otherwise, but the WWE revisionist royalty-free history set me straight. I hope like hell that eventually they reach SOME kind of deal with the panda loving hippies to be able to show the scratch logo. During that era the damn logo was on everything! that's a lot of blurry spots! But I doubt that will happen. Not while Vince is in charge anyway. and I also hate the changes in theme music.
|
|
|
Post by spmkillie on Feb 24, 2007 19:08:26 GMT -5
* Apparently Hulk Hogan's theme song was ALWAYS Real American, even in the days when he used the Jimi Hendrix song. My senile memory tried to tell me otherwise, but the WWE revisionist royalty-free history set me straight. this one REALLY pisses me off... why the hell do wwe refuse to pay for licences? i mean if ecw could affoard Metallica and Iggy Pop then im sure vince can affoard a song thats been used more time than Lita ffs.
|
|
|
Post by lildude8218 on Feb 24, 2007 21:40:28 GMT -5
* Apparently Hulk Hogan's theme song was ALWAYS Real American, even in the days when he used the Jimi Hendrix song. My senile memory tried to tell me otherwise, but the WWE revisionist royalty-free history set me straight. this one REALLY pisses me off... why the hell do wwe refuse to pay for licences? i mean if ecw could affoard Metallica and Iggy Pop then im sure vince can affoard a song thats been used more time than Lita ffs. Because they feel like actually turning a profit? Do you realize how much money Metallica wanted from Vince to use Enter Sandman? I don't remember the exact figure but I remember that it was completely outrageous. And if I remember right, ECW didn't pay licensing to anyone and then only started paying Metallica some sort of fee when they started doing PPVs but once again I don't know the exact details. I just remember Paul saying one time how Sandman jumping to WCW hurt him personally because of the money he spent to be able to use Enter Sandman on PPV.
|
|
|
Post by TRUTH TELLER on Feb 24, 2007 22:31:52 GMT -5
Just a question... Why does everybody care so much about what entrance music a guy uses in a video that's years (to decades) old? It just doesn't make sense to me, since I tend to turn off entrances in the wrestling games and fast forward through longer entrances in matches anywyas... Because it's part of the history of the character and event. If Randy Savage came out to a generic rock song instead of Pomp and Circumstance, it would be distorting that time period and character. A theme song is just as much a part of the show as the match is. Imagine Steve Austin coming out to Red Rooster's music. Probably not going to bring back any nostalgic memories for people down the road. Testify. Theme music is a part of a wrestler's overall image and presentation. If WWE doesn't want to use the original songs (And I understand why they wouldn't as far as cost goes) I say they should just not have intros. Just cut them out. When I watch a movie or listen to music from a certain era, I want the exact version I grew up with. It kind of wrecks the nostalgia for me otherwise. As an example, WWE 24/7 recently played WCW Spring Stampede 1994, and EVERY song except Flair's was altered. And the replacements were absolutely terrible or didn't fit. Like Rick Rude for example came out to Jamie Noble's original redneck theme! And don't even get me started on Todd Grisham overdubbing Michael Buffer (seriously).
|
|
|
Post by "St. Louis Viper" Buck Summers on Feb 24, 2007 22:37:40 GMT -5
To be fair, you know what it costs to have anyone say "Lets get ready to rumble" or a variation thereof (even DX's Lets get ready to suck it) without his precense and approval? $10,000. Now, would you, as a business man, pay $10,000 for a Rick Rude match?
|
|