Byakugan
Unicron
To my peeps and you fools, say it loud and say it proud, Christian rules!
Posts: 2,525
|
Post by Byakugan on Jan 8, 2007 17:16:17 GMT -5
My God. I can't believe I can't find one interesting thing on Raw.
SD had an INCREDIBLE run with Booker but the only thing worth watching now is Regal for me (Booker only sucks because he is put with batista)
ECW is simply uninteresting to me.
It seems like this era since Cena beat JBL for the title and Batista beat HHH has been a borefest OVERALL.
The entire time Edge was champion I thought Cena was champion.
Batista is just terrible. There is no excuse for this boring Warrior wannabe.
Booker T and Kurt Angles runs were the only good things since Batista was champion.... And that was only because he was injured. Reys run was a Arquette-esque
This is just MY OWN OPINION but the undercard isn't too impressive either. Not because they suck but because they've been put in uninteresting feuds and guys like MVP and Kennedy aren't entertaining.
Thank God for ROH.
|
|
iwchater
Samurai Cop
Greatest Album ever
Posts: 2,103
|
Post by iwchater on Jan 8, 2007 17:20:26 GMT -5
U share the same opinion with a lot of people. This era suxx monkey balls. Yet HHH era sucked more b/c nothing was entertaining.
|
|
|
Post by -Lithium- on Jan 8, 2007 17:20:32 GMT -5
No matter the product, everyones gonna vote against WWE - Current anyway...
|
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Jan 8, 2007 17:21:36 GMT -5
Seeing how this is the first time in ages that I actually don't care if I miss RAW once in a while, I'd say yes.
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Snips on Jan 8, 2007 17:22:01 GMT -5
I thought about this for a minute or so and...yeah I agree. I got into wrestling during the Hogan era. The Austin era was great. I at least watched the HHH in the hopes that something good would come, and sometimes it did (Rocky's Hollywood heel turn, Benoit and Eddie on top).
The Hart era's a toughie. There was a LOT of pure garbage, but at least you could count on a solid main event most of the time. I honestly just don't care about their top guys right now, and that's the first time in 20 years of watching wrestling I've felt that way.
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on Jan 8, 2007 17:22:16 GMT -5
I really haven't seen anyone cling to something or someone so badly just to remain watching as much as I have in this era.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2007 17:26:41 GMT -5
The current era. Predictable and boring as.......well......a wet dish rag.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2007 17:28:30 GMT -5
I remembering the Diesel reign so I'm going to say no way
Better matches nowadays than there was during that era
|
|
|
Post by odanobunaga on Jan 8, 2007 17:33:57 GMT -5
The Bret era, the Worse? Nope. I rather watch that thing in a loop that watch one single RAW from these days.
|
|
MichaelRBoh
Unicron
cowpee changed gimmick
Posts: 3,301
|
Post by MichaelRBoh on Jan 8, 2007 17:34:49 GMT -5
the diesel era was the worst to me. that almost lost me as a fan.
right now is great imo because its the first time i'm able to get ppvs every month. no more having to watch a blurry screen and "listen" to it.
|
|
|
Post by Error on Jan 8, 2007 17:41:09 GMT -5
The New Generation (Hart/Diesel) era was horrible. I loved The guys they had but, the cookie cutter writing and horrible gimmicks were terrible. I enjoyed WCW far more during that time. I actually like most of what I see now.
|
|
|
Post by The son of a plumber. on Jan 8, 2007 17:42:48 GMT -5
The Diesel/HBK Era was the worst. This is a close second those. So I didnt vote on the poll.
|
|
Boomaga
Team Rocket
Evolve or Die.
Posts: 800
|
Post by Boomaga on Jan 8, 2007 17:49:37 GMT -5
I missed most of the Hart era, stopping around WM 8 and getting back into it around 1997, which makes it ironic that Bret's my fave of all time, even what little I saw of him live. So considering that's the only era I haven't been able to really watch, I gotta go with Now. I watch it and remain unimpressed on a roughly weekly basis.
|
|
|
Post by BD Punk AKA SUSPENDED! on Jan 8, 2007 17:52:48 GMT -5
The Bret Hart era, but not because of Bret. The Bret Hart era was the worst because of guys like, Sparky Plugg, Duke Drose, Doink, etc....................
|
|
|
Post by Galluchadore on Jan 8, 2007 18:19:00 GMT -5
i voted for the current era perhaps there was alot of crap during the HBK-Diesel era but that was a different time. The company should of grown up and moved forward into a more entertaining time period but its not happening. It has three world champions (which in it self is bad) who in my opinion are some of the worst champions in history and they are plagued by a horrible writing staff that is more interested in looks then substance
|
|
|
Post by samachine on Jan 8, 2007 18:19:01 GMT -5
No matter the product, everyones gonna vote against WWE - Current anyway... and no matter what the topic you will post this about it.
|
|
|
Post by K7 - WC's Crowd Extra on Jan 8, 2007 18:33:52 GMT -5
Bret era was pretty bad simply because of all the crappy gimmicks and what not.
|
|
|
Post by EvilShadow76 on Jan 8, 2007 18:39:39 GMT -5
The John Cena era is the worst I've seen since I started watching again back in 1993. I used to watch every Monday, but now I just don't even bother with it because it's just so damn boring. The most I'll do these days is read the results. I not gonna waste 2 hrs of my life every Monday watching the John Cena show...starring John Cena
|
|
Boku AKA Da Green Guy
El Dandy
WC's Resident Pirate Otaku and Official Scapegoat
Always and Forever, Hurricane.
Posts: 8,371
|
Post by Boku AKA Da Green Guy on Jan 8, 2007 18:40:00 GMT -5
Worst?
For RAW and maybe ECW, but not for Smackdown!.
I think that this Era has it's massive down times, but for the most part it's pretty good. At least talented workers are employed.
|
|
BRV
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wants him some Taco Flavored Kisses.
Posts: 17,333
|
Post by BRV on Jan 8, 2007 18:48:43 GMT -5
Basing the eras purely on who is the champion is not fair. John Cena and Batista couldn't hold a candle to Bret Hart on their best days, but the talent in the current WWE absolutely blows away the talent from 1993-1997. The current midcard is far superior to the mid-90s, the tag division is better (but it took a lot of reconstruction) and the ability and talent of the wrestlers is better than the mid-1990s.
People will say that now is the worst for two reasons: 1) they are nostalgic for the old days. Back in 1994, I was a little 7 year-old mark who loved everything about guys like Sparky Plugg, Isaac Yankem and Mantaur. The people who are voting that now is the worst probably feel the same way. 2) They just like complaining about current wrestling. Imagine what WWF would've been in the late-90s if the internet smarks were as prevelant as they are now.
And, finally, as much as we don't like it, WWE is making money. They weren't doing that in the mid-90s. Altogether, this may be one of the worst, but it is nowhere near the worst. Watch a copy of SummerSlam 1995 if you need anymore evidence.
|
|