|
Post by PTBartman on May 28, 2007 22:36:13 GMT -5
actually by this pay per view there'll be a "total roster shuffle" so what are your dream matches?
|
|
|
Post by Fruity Delicious Skittles on May 29, 2007 7:59:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by robferatu on Jun 4, 2007 2:40:59 GMT -5
I expect Edge vs. Batista III. Some kind of stipulation match of course, maybe Hell In The Cell.
Even after losing that match, Batista will still claim to be needing "his" Championship back.
|
|
Hiroshi Hase
Patti Mayonnaise
The Good Ol' Days
Posts: 30,755
|
Post by Hiroshi Hase on Jun 4, 2007 7:41:04 GMT -5
I might order this PPV as it'll happen after the draft, so who knows what the lineup will be. Though I see Cena/Orton happening, and Batista/Edge for the 3rd time with Mark Henry running interference.
|
|
BRV
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wants him some Taco Flavored Kisses.
Posts: 17,399
|
Post by BRV on Jun 4, 2007 14:15:01 GMT -5
The video hyping this PPV officially advertises it as "For the first time ever, every championship will be on the line". Under that assumption, we'll have nine matches on the card, unless a few are title-for-title. Plus, this is the first PPV after the tri-brand WWE Draft, so we could have some "dream" matches to throw in there, too.
Based on absolutely nothing, I am ready to call WWE Vengeance the potential PPV of the year.
|
|
mo
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 17,046
|
Post by mo on Jun 4, 2007 19:50:07 GMT -5
Those are Taker's hands holding the belt on that poster
|
|
BRV
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wants him some Taco Flavored Kisses.
Posts: 17,399
|
Post by BRV on Jun 4, 2007 23:23:13 GMT -5
For those of us still upset that The Undertaker is out with an injury, here's what the poster should've been: Dang you, Edge. Dang you to Heck.
|
|
|
Post by krazysane on Jun 6, 2007 11:00:09 GMT -5
This is why I skipped ONS and decided to order this instead. With all the titles on the line and with the draft going on before the ppv. it will make for a interesting ppv.
|
|
Jiren
Patti Mayonnaise
Hearts Bayformers
Posts: 35,163
|
Post by Jiren on Jun 6, 2007 15:00:36 GMT -5
I'm willing to bet that NONE of the top 3 will change
|
|
Hiroshi Hase
Patti Mayonnaise
The Good Ol' Days
Posts: 30,755
|
Post by Hiroshi Hase on Jun 6, 2007 17:23:05 GMT -5
I'm willing to bet that NONE of the top 3 will change I agree, Cena's not losing any time soon, Lashley just got his title back and I think they're going to keep Edge as champion for a while on SD. I think Summerslam might be where at least one of the major titles changes hands.
|
|
Ace Diamond
Patti Mayonnaise
Believes in Adrian Veidt, as Should We All.
mmm...flavor text
Posts: 36,043
|
Post by Ace Diamond on Jun 6, 2007 21:53:40 GMT -5
I think I could best describe my unhappiness at the status quo with my made-up tagline for this event.
WWE Vengeance: Because words are just words to us.
|
|
|
Post by Sawylent White on Jun 8, 2007 11:23:20 GMT -5
I think I could best describe my unhappiness at the status quo with my made-up tagline for this event. WWE Vengeance: Because words are just words to us. I have to assume this PPV will be no more a "night of champions" than any other PPV that they've held, or will hold, this year. In which case, what a painfully stupid tag-line.
|
|
|
Post by bstrathie on Jun 8, 2007 23:49:13 GMT -5
|
|
Ace Diamond
Patti Mayonnaise
Believes in Adrian Veidt, as Should We All.
mmm...flavor text
Posts: 36,043
|
Post by Ace Diamond on Jun 8, 2007 23:54:36 GMT -5
If Batista loses, he doesn't get any more shots at the belt as long as Edge is champion.
|
|
|
Post by bstrathie on Jun 8, 2007 23:59:06 GMT -5
If Batista loses, he doesn't get any more shots at the belt as long as Edge is champion. But hasn't there been heaps of matches with that rule, and they have not been called Do or Die. Why is this special?
|
|
Ace Diamond
Patti Mayonnaise
Believes in Adrian Veidt, as Should We All.
mmm...flavor text
Posts: 36,043
|
Post by Ace Diamond on Jun 9, 2007 0:04:57 GMT -5
If Batista loses, he doesn't get any more shots at the belt as long as Edge is champion. But hasn't there been heaps of matches with that rule, and they have not been called Do or Die. Why is this special? This time they mean it?
|
|
|
Post by Just "Dan" is Fine, Thank You on Jun 9, 2007 1:39:18 GMT -5
But hasn't there been heaps of matches with that rule, and they have not been called Do or Die. Why is this special? This time they mean it? If you recall, when he finally beat King Booker, it was also a "Do or Die" match. Draft this motherf***er to Raw.
|
|
|
Post by angryfan on Jun 9, 2007 1:42:52 GMT -5
If you recall, when he finally beat King Booker, it was also a "Do or Die" match. Draft this mothersmurfer to Raw. Yes, and the beauty of THAT "Do or Die" match, was the stipulation for his previous shot at Booker, which was "if he gets DQ'ed, you win the title, but if he beats you, no more title shots".
|
|
Ace Diamond
Patti Mayonnaise
Believes in Adrian Veidt, as Should We All.
mmm...flavor text
Posts: 36,043
|
Post by Ace Diamond on Jun 9, 2007 1:43:22 GMT -5
If you recall, when he finally beat King Booker, it was also a "Do or Die" match. Draft this mothersmurfer to Raw. Well yeah. I doubt they'll only give Edge a reign this small though, otherwise Batista would've won the cage match. Batista's not winning. And if I'm wrong, then i'm wrong.
|
|
|
Post by Just "Dan" is Fine, Thank You on Jun 9, 2007 3:03:57 GMT -5
If you recall, when he finally beat King Booker, it was also a "Do or Die" match. Draft this mothersmurfer to Raw. Well yeah. I doubt they'll only give Edge a reign this small though, otherwise Batista would've won the cage match. Batista's not winning. And if I'm wrong, then i'm wrong. I'm with you here. Batista not winning is almost a given to me.
|
|