|
|
Post by rhynomite on Oct 30, 2007 22:18:18 GMT -5
There's enough talent to combine all 3 brands,have 1 show(RAW),and PPV's every second month. Make it matter again.
|
|
|
|
Post by lildude8218 on Oct 30, 2007 22:18:56 GMT -5
No.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tyfo on Oct 30, 2007 22:19:56 GMT -5
Mr. Lashley.....if you would.
|
|
default
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Blames Everything On Snitsky. Yes, Even THAT.
Posts: 17,056
|
Post by default on Oct 30, 2007 22:23:58 GMT -5
Only if they booked Funaki as champ.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jedi-El of Tomorrow on Oct 30, 2007 22:24:36 GMT -5
There's enough talent to combine all 3 brands,have 1 show(RAW),and PPV's every second month. Make it matter again. No way, man. I'll just say one reason why they shouldn't, ECW. That hour is usually the best show the WWE puts on, and combining the rosters takes that 1 hour away. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2007 22:26:47 GMT -5
Three times the HHH!
|
|
Joekishi
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,490
|
Post by Joekishi on Oct 30, 2007 22:29:54 GMT -5
Only one wrestling show?
MY god are you mad?
We get to watch 4 a week..
that's a good thing
|
|
|
|
Post by Cenas A Wanksta on Oct 30, 2007 22:30:30 GMT -5
i agree splitting up the brands sucked so hard for wwe i cant count how many stale feuds there are cuz of it . COMBINE THEM NOW VINCE NOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BEFORE ITS TOO LATE!
|
|
|
|
Post by Spankymac is sick of the swiss on Oct 30, 2007 22:30:49 GMT -5
No. That cuts off WWE's revenue stream through those other two shows and 6 months of PPVs, and if you think Vince will ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever cut off a potentially viable revenue stream, I have some magic beans I'd like to sell you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bob Schlapowitz on Oct 30, 2007 22:33:26 GMT -5
I certainly wouldn't mind if they recombined Raw and Smackdown! but left ECW seperate.
|
|
|
|
Post by #Classic Hi-Definition X on Oct 30, 2007 22:34:39 GMT -5
Vince: I can't go for that, no no, no can do...
|
|
|
|
Post by RedSmile on Oct 30, 2007 22:46:04 GMT -5
There's enough talent to combine all 3 brands,have 1 show(RAW),and PPV's every second month. Make it matter again. You guys really stop with this pipe dream of having the brand split end. It would almost take one of the shows being canceled for that to happen. |
|
|
|
Post by twiggy101 on Oct 30, 2007 22:48:34 GMT -5
Wouldn't quite a few guys be out of TV? It would be like a 1 hour TNA. Unless the show was 5 hours, of course.
|
|
|
|
Post by "St. Louis Viper" Buck Summers on Oct 30, 2007 22:55:03 GMT -5
Is it sad that I would watch a 5 hour a week single WWE show?
|
|
default
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Blames Everything On Snitsky. Yes, Even THAT.
Posts: 17,056
|
Post by default on Oct 31, 2007 0:11:31 GMT -5
Is it sad that I would watch a 5 hour a week single WWE show? Yes, watching 5 hours straight of a single WWE show would make Jesus cry. YOU DON'T WANT CARLITO'S BODYGUARD TO CRY DO YOU? |
|
|
|
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Oct 31, 2007 0:26:30 GMT -5
Financially, with them making hand over fist as is, that'd make no sense at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Henry Mark on Oct 31, 2007 1:37:21 GMT -5
Having three brands has the potential for more storylines, as long as the proper effort is put into all three brands. Whether it is or not is up for debate Yes, that may be up for debate, but I'd rather have a few good storylines and a few bad storylines than seeing the SAME few storylines for 5 hours a week. Combining the rosters would cause you to see a lot of wrestlers less often (and yes, for some that would be good), but you'd see the guys you already see a lot of a WHOLE lot more. Let's say a Shawn and Orton segment took 20 minutes on Monday, they'd probably get another 10 minutes on the Tuesday show, and another 20 on Friday to further the storyline. You want 50 minutes a week, an entire ECW show's worth of time, devoted to two guys fake problems with each other? I think 20 minutes is too much as it is unless it's a match. The brands need to stay seperate. P.S. "You" does not refer to you, DevonDragon," but to those who want them back together. After posting and realizing I quoted you to begin with, it didn't sound right to continue using "you" so vaguely. |
|
HRH The KING
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS
Posts: 15,079
|
Post by HRH The KING on Oct 31, 2007 1:50:19 GMT -5
I would be fine with the brand split if each brand offered something different.
But they don't.
|
|
Lt. Palumbo
Hank Scorpio
On again off again watcher of a wrestling TV show
Posts: 6,068
|
Post by Lt. Palumbo on Oct 31, 2007 3:48:32 GMT -5
brand split has always been a little meaningless anyway, what with drafts and straight up random show jumping, just look at khali,hasn't he been on all three shows this year?
seriously, I'm rarely certain at this stage of who's on which show
the only thing that's certain is HHH will always be in Raw
|
|
|
|
Post by Loki on Oct 31, 2007 10:14:11 GMT -5
One show?
No way... Half of the roster would get the axe, and it'd be only Orton, Cena, HBK, HHH, Vince, Batista, Taker (and Edge?) plus some randomly picked midcarders...
The brand split isn't bad per se , it'd work if they only booked it decently.
|
|
helped $lim jinx NXT. Woops
