|
|
Post by Big Daddy Bad Booking on Nov 6, 2007 20:41:13 GMT -5
Nah. The IC title IMO is for people who are either up-and-coming (being groomed for the main title), or a reward for a mid-carder. UT is neither one of them, and it would be a big step down for the phenom.
|
|
|
|
Post by BitterAF on Nov 6, 2007 21:20:22 GMT -5
He would of been a great IC champ before he became world champ.
When he first entered the wwf, he should of became ic champ pretty early, after a few months, held it for awhile, then decided he wanted to go for the world title, and either dropped it or pulled a warrior and win the world title while still holding the IC title and drop it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Silent Brad on Nov 6, 2007 21:26:24 GMT -5
 NOi had to say it since nobody else would. |
|
|
|
Post by casualobserver on Nov 6, 2007 23:06:09 GMT -5
Maybe they can do something where Undertaker puts Jeff Hardy over by beating the crap out of him, then shaking Jeff's hand when Taker can't keep him down....oh wait, nevermind.
|
|
|
|
Post by normcoleman on Nov 7, 2007 0:32:07 GMT -5
He can give it a much needed cred boost....why not?
|
|
|
|
Post by Palatial Regalia on Nov 7, 2007 10:16:44 GMT -5
To compare the Hardcore Title in anyway to the IC title is laughable. The Hardcore Title was always kind of a "joke" title. It didn't really matter who held it. That's your opinion, I personally only watched WWE at the time for the 24/7 Hardcore Title. |
|
|
|
Post by forgottensinpwf on Nov 7, 2007 10:19:18 GMT -5
 Nay Nay! |
|
|
|
Post by Avalanche Alvarez on Nov 7, 2007 11:29:21 GMT -5
Taker's a "squasher".
We've already had a "squasher" as IC champ and it's anti-climactic.
Taker fits the world title profile too well.
|
|
