|
Post by drjayphd (feat. Pitbull) on Jan 6, 2009 0:03:23 GMT -5
so we hot shot the title to a mid-carder then hotshot it to a woman good grief. I take a crap on that idea Well, unless you can think of a main-eventer who, size-wise, could match up well against most of the women in wrestling today, even one whose character could also plausibly beat up a guy... Really, the hot-shotting to get it on Kendrick was due to time constraints, assuming we're planting this in WWE now. If it'd be in the future, they wouldn't have to staple the title to Kendrick just so he'd lose it, but rather let things play out over time. It'd probably take at least six months for this angle to properly develop.
|
|
|
Post by Robbymac on Jan 6, 2009 0:06:03 GMT -5
so we hot shot the title to a mid-carder then hotshot it to a woman good grief. I take a crap on that idea Well, unless you can think of a main-eventer who, size-wise, could match up well against most of the women in wrestling today, even one whose character could also plausibly beat up a guy... Really, the hot-shotting to get it on Kendrick was due to time constraints, assuming we're planting this in WWE now. If it'd be in the future, they wouldn't have to staple the title to Kendrick just so he'd lose it, but rather let things play out over time. It'd probably take at least six months for this angle to properly develop. I've got a better idea, why don't we just keep the WWE title where it belongs. Around a mans waste. It could take six months or six years or six hundred years. It will NEVER be logical.
|
|