Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 18:17:05 GMT -5
Has a movie ever remained at 0%? Even Jack and Jill has 3%, somehow. Edit: Nevermind, Bucky Larson is the answer to my question. I knew this because I when I read a link about this having a 0%, the article said that it was "pitching a perfect Bucky Larson".
|
|
|
Post by kevinnashfan1 on Apr 18, 2015 18:31:53 GMT -5
I went to see the movie through Moviepass today. I walked out after 45 minutes. I liked the first one. The funniest part of the movie was the trailers they showed before it.
|
|
Crimson
Hank Scorpio
Thank you DWade
Posts: 6,511
|
Post by Crimson on Apr 18, 2015 19:10:55 GMT -5
I'm waiting for 'shame shaming' to become a thing They call that "Call Out Culture" because everything needs a title these days.
|
|
|
Post by Confused Mark Wahlberg on Apr 18, 2015 19:21:38 GMT -5
Some poor dope had to sit for hours creating a CGI Kevin James getting kicked by a horse.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 19:42:05 GMT -5
Hey Nick Bakay, why are you involved in this garbage? Is that a real cat, or that crappy puppet? But yeah, it not like James has had the best luck with movies.
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 121,080
|
Post by Mozenrath on Apr 18, 2015 20:01:09 GMT -5
Hey Nick Bakay, why are you involved in this garbage? Is that a real cat, or that crappy puppet? But yeah, it not like James has had the best luck with movies. Salem from Sabrina the Teenage Witch, I'm guessing, who was a puppet most of the time, only being a cat when he's walking around the set in the background or hopping on or off of things.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 20:32:43 GMT -5
How can he? When has he been good? His stand up (sweat the small stuff) was amazing. YES. I loved it as a teenager and it still cracks me up.
|
|
|
Post by Bang Bang Bart on Apr 18, 2015 21:59:49 GMT -5
Has a movie ever remained at 0%? Even Jack and Jill has 3%, somehow. Edit: Nevermind, Bucky Larson is the answer to my question. Considering how irritatingly obnoxious the promotion for Bucky Larson was, it deserves every bit of that 0%.
|
|
Knailsic From Now On
Dennis Stamp
Loneliest Number Since #1
Waiting with my red eyes and my stone heart
Posts: 4,364
|
Post by Knailsic From Now On on Apr 18, 2015 22:49:57 GMT -5
Has a movie ever remained at 0%? Even Jack and Jill has 3%, somehow. Edit: Nevermind, Bucky Larson is the answer to my question. Considering how irritatingly obnoxious the promotion for Bucky Larson was, it deserves every bit of that 0%. Never before did an advertising campaign make me want to see a movie flop so hard
|
|
|
Post by Tiger Millionaire on Apr 18, 2015 23:10:21 GMT -5
Is that a real cat, or that crappy puppet? But yeah, it not like James has had the best luck with movies. Salem from Sabrina the Teenage Witch, I'm guessing, who was a puppet most of the time, only being a cat when he's walking around the set in the background or hopping on or off of things. I heard that cat was...that's right, it was a stunt granny.
|
|
|
Post by Sparvid on Apr 18, 2015 23:19:33 GMT -5
This film can't be any worse than Zookeepier. Zookeeper at least had a plot. The plot of this seems to be "Fatty Fat Fat Is In Las Vegas Because He's Fat." I have no interest in seeing either one, but from what I hear, the plot of the first Paul Blart movie was "silly Die Hard parody" that some might find funny, while the sequel is "main character exists". So I wouldn't be surprised if there are people who liked the first, but are disappointed in this one.
|
|
|
Post by Cela on Apr 18, 2015 23:50:29 GMT -5
Dear Kevin James, Who ever is picking your movies, they're NOT helping! You can do better. Thanks He has good syndication money from King of Queens and there is a clear market for his brand of athletic fat humor. More power to him.
|
|
Dr. T is an alien
Patti Mayonnaise
Knows when to hold them, knows when to fold them
I've been found out!
Posts: 31,359
|
Post by Dr. T is an alien on Apr 19, 2015 1:10:09 GMT -5
Has a movie ever remained at 0%? Even Jack and Jill has 3%, somehow. Edit: Nevermind, Bucky Larson is the answer to my question. If I remember right, the movie with the most reviews that's still at 0% is Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever, a 2002 action film starring Antonio Banderas and Lucy Liu. 115 reviews, not one of them positive. www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ballistic_ecks_vs_sever/?search=ballisticI should figure out how to review that one, then. I liked it. Granted, it made absolutely no damned sense whatsoever, some of the acting was really hammy, and it made no sense (this was really a problem). However, most of the action sequences were done well, the fight scene between Liu and Ray Park was great, and I cannot stress enough how hot both Liu and Talisa Soto were in the film. I certainly did not watch the film with my brain on, which really helped, at least enough to actually enjoy it.
|
|
|
Post by "Mr Wonderdick" Dick Dastardly on Apr 19, 2015 1:14:05 GMT -5
Just wait until there is the fetish porn equivalent, Paul Fart: Mall Scat 2.
|
|
|
Post by BJ Sturgeon on Apr 19, 2015 7:15:40 GMT -5
Hi, I'm Kevin James and I'm a fat mall cop. *falls on his face*
Hi, I'm Kevin James and I'm a fat zoo keeper. *falls on his face*
Hi, I'm Kevin James and I'm a fat fire fighter. *falls on his face*
Somehow I'm not shocked.
|
|
|
Post by Rumble McSkirmish on Apr 19, 2015 7:41:42 GMT -5
Just wait until there is the fetish porn equivalent, Paul Fart: Mall Scat 2. Sadly with how uncreative the modern porn industry is with titles, the best we`re going to get is: Paul Blart: A XXX parody. Still, five words that have no business being next to each other whatsoever.
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Apr 19, 2015 10:45:37 GMT -5
So, it made 7.3 million on Friday and is on pace to recover most of its budget over the weekend (Projected $24 million on a given $30 million budget).
Take that however you want.
|
|
|
Post by xCompackx on Apr 19, 2015 11:08:50 GMT -5
So, it made 7.3 million on Friday and is on pace to recover most of its budget over the weekend (Projected $24 million on a given $30 million budget). Take that however you want. Serious question here, but has there ever been any studies done to show that the general public gives a single shit about critic reviews? I mean, these kinds of films get consistently low scores yet (as far as I know) always make back their budget.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2015 12:18:16 GMT -5
Has a movie ever remained at 0%? Even Jack and Jill has 3%, somehow. Edit: Nevermind, Bucky Larson is the answer to my question. If I remember right, the movie with the most reviews that's still at 0% is Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever, a 2002 action film starring Antonio Banderas and Lucy Liu. 115 reviews, not one of them positive. www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ballistic_ecks_vs_sever/?search=ballisticThe only thing I remember is that there not 1 but 2 gba games based on that movie that are somehow better then the movie itself.
|
|
Dr. T is an alien
Patti Mayonnaise
Knows when to hold them, knows when to fold them
I've been found out!
Posts: 31,359
|
Post by Dr. T is an alien on Apr 19, 2015 12:37:58 GMT -5
Just wait until there is the fetish porn equivalent, Paul Fart: Mall Scat 2. Sadly with how uncreative the modern porn industry is with titles, the best we`re going to get is: Paul Blart: A XXX parody. Still, five words that have no business being next to each other whatsoever. Sad thing is, if you have Ron Jeremy star in that it might wind up being funnier than the movie it is parodying.
|
|