Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-]
FANatic
Writer, Lover of all things Wrestling. Analytical, Critical, Lovable (hopefully). Lets all have fun!
Posts: 235,468
Member is Online
|
Post by Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-] on Mar 14, 2016 17:23:09 GMT -5
Ill say this. You know what Buries Roman more than a HHH conspiracy?
Holding the WWE Title possibly THREE TIMES in less than FOUR Months
That is worse than Sheamus. And look what happened to Sheamus when they shoehorned the title on him multiple times early on.
Force feeding a dude a title multiple times in short reigns doesn't make people love them more or build them up as credible or someone to be cheered, if anything, it's tedious. The fact that Roman may be considered a three time champion by the end of WrestleMania and MANY stars that the WWE Fans just want to see hold the belt once may never get the opportunity, is more frustrating than words can describe.
Randy Orton holding the belt a billion times F***ed him over too. It's not the answer, it doesn't make your belt look good, it doesn't make the guy you're trying to push look good, and it makes everything overall look so F***ing MEANINGLESS.
|
|
|
Post by SCCB Was Told To Do Steroids on Mar 14, 2016 21:30:28 GMT -5
My question is: is HHH making Roman look strong?
|
|
|
Post by Apricots And A Pear Tree on Mar 14, 2016 21:31:53 GMT -5
My question is: is HHH making Roman look strong? No.
|
|
|
Post by misconduct was wrong on Mar 14, 2016 22:54:25 GMT -5
My question is: is HHH making Roman look strong? No. What would you do differently? H isn't going to sabotage his own character for Roman. There has to be a balance. I've had no problem with the booking of the feud so far, it's just that the fans don't like Reigns.
|
|