|
Post by rapidfire187 on Jan 6, 2014 19:02:00 GMT -5
The Iron Sheik, who sometimes resembles a barrel setting on two lengths of pipe. His belly button was looking absurd at least at one point. On, I think the first JCW show, J & Shaggy on commentary made fun of it. I think they said it looked like a fish bowl, as an outie that is.
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Jan 5, 2014 19:42:59 GMT -5
I wish tobacco and marijuana could swap places in terms of legality. Seems like the world would be a nicer place.
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Jan 4, 2014 22:09:55 GMT -5
1. Darren Young was a member of the Nexus.
2. The Nexus was lead by CM Punk at one point.
3. CM Punk lost the WWE Championship to The Rock.
4. The Rock lost the WWF Championship to HHH years prior.
5. HHH was revealed to be behind Rikishi running over Steve Austin.
6. One of Austin's earliest feuds in WWE was against Savio Vega.
Rob Van Dam and Mr. Wrestling #2
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Jan 3, 2014 8:16:47 GMT -5
It's extremely common. Not necessarily with my friends but people in general. I've been cheated on multiple times in my life and I've known a few dudes that cheat like it's nothing and sometimes act proud of it. I hope they all give each other AIDS and suffer until they die.
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Jan 2, 2014 21:45:44 GMT -5
I'm thinking it couldn't have been that because child porn is very illegal and he would have certainly been charged for that crime. It is very illegal but if they learned about it through an illegitimately obtained search warrant that does not matter. He can be on their radar for the future, but that is it. Yea, I thought of that after I posted. Good looking out.
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Jan 2, 2014 20:59:28 GMT -5
I am confused. It does not actually say what evidence was collected after the warrant was improperly appropriated. Did he have child porn on his computer and was only caught because he was acting extremely creepy in a still-legal manner? I'm thinking it couldn't have been that because child porn is very illegal and he would have certainly been charged for that crime.
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Jan 2, 2014 20:50:38 GMT -5
Michael Cole in 2010 and 2011. And while it happened, it was never satisfying enough. Honestly it should have ended at Wrestlemania with as soon as the bell rang, Jerry kicks him in the gut then piledrives and pins him in like 10 seconds. Yea, I have no idea why that got so much time. I sat through that garbage live.
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Jan 2, 2014 20:33:05 GMT -5
Why do Eddie and Davey need to be WrestleMania main eventers? Just let them have good matches in the tag division. Honestly, I don't see anyone in NXT as a future Wrestlemania main eventer. Don't get me wrong, I'm a big fan of a lot of the guys but none of them look like futute megastars to me.
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Jan 2, 2014 19:58:48 GMT -5
I've often wondered if Paul Heyman had some reluctance towards putting RVD on top as world champ in ECW was due to his constant marijuana promotion. Not that it was a huge performance issue, but one does wonder if Heyman thought the potential for such an event as July 2006 was possible. Or maybe Heyman always intended to put the belt on RVD and never quite put together the money match? I dunno. Either way why is HHH vindicated here? Because RVD got fined 4 years later for having weed and speeding? Now if we're arguing that RVD lost all interest in full time wrestling after 2007, then that's an interesting argument against pushing him too hard. Of course if he hadn't been politically sabotaged for most of the 2002-04 time period, maybe RVD would have cared more about staying with WWE? It is ironic that a guy with his credentials (grand slam champion in WWE, TNA world champ, ECW run) would be almost considered a disappointment, but he never quite ascended to consistent main event status. Eh, I doubt Heyman cared about that at all. A.) The world champ getting arrested for weed would basically be a non issue for ECW, maybe even a positive. It's not like the consequences for simple posession are severe, maybe a night in jail, a fine and maybe probation. B.) Heyman's promo at the first One Night Stand PPV. "I haven't been crying, my eyes are red because I just smoked a joint in the back with Van Dam." That line tells me that even if Heyman doesn't smoke, he doesn't consider it to be a serious issue in the least
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Dec 31, 2013 21:53:22 GMT -5
Wtf @ Jeff Hardy?
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Dec 31, 2013 17:20:45 GMT -5
He's flat out awesome. WWE has so many big guys with massive potential, it's unfair. Luke Harper Roman Reigns Titus O'Neil Cesaro I could see anyone of those guys as future WWE World champs. Usually WWE's hosses are big, bland, and powerful, but all these guys have tons of potential. I agree with those except Titus. Just not much of a fan of his ring work. Big E deserves a mention though.
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Dec 31, 2013 17:12:33 GMT -5
I doubt it but it would probably be good television. Solomon Crowe's new hacker gimmick sounds really epic.
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Dec 28, 2013 18:55:11 GMT -5
Absolutely the best of any sport.
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Dec 27, 2013 9:54:55 GMT -5
I'd say Undertaker/Kane. They had several feuds over the course of like 13 years. They had a lot of tag runs too. Basically, they never interacted without their storyline being a focal point.
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Dec 26, 2013 16:24:26 GMT -5
There was a Ken Shamrock match on PPV in 1999 with Ryan Shamrock was in his corner. I THINK, he was facing Val Venis but I'm not sure. She slapped Shamrock at some point and he very loudly says "What the f*** are you doing?".
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Dec 23, 2013 20:22:48 GMT -5
Rob Van Dam and Jean Claude Van Damme are related. I've heard that one a lot.
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Dec 22, 2013 18:09:29 GMT -5
I'm TERRIBLE about deleting emails. By using searches, I just deleted ~8,000, yet still have another ~11,000 to go... How 'bout you? I'm in the same boat. I hate that I can only delete 20 emails at a time. 99% of it is spam too.
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Dec 22, 2013 18:08:02 GMT -5
Usually, they are clumsy cash in attempts, often plagued with failed attempts to get it recorded, and watching a guy stumble around and f*** up over and over, it can be irritating to watch. I am mostly indifferent to it, since I don't tend to watch those. Agreed 100%
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Dec 22, 2013 17:52:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Dec 22, 2013 1:08:06 GMT -5
The careers of The Miz, Alberto Del Rio and R-Truth are just fine, but they've all fallen way down the card since getting their ass kicked by Cena. My point is that when people go over Cena, it helps them more than it helps Cena if he wins. The Shield, Punk and Bryan all have a ton of heat still and I'm almost certain it wouldn't be the same if Cena had went over them in their big ppv matches. It's about perception. R-Truth fell down the card because of the short sighted idea to make "Little Jimmy" t-shirts. Alberto Del Rio fell down the card because the World Heavyweight Title no longer exists. Miz fell down the card because WWE has no clear idea what they want with him. All I'm saying is that Cena going over the Wyatts would hurt their credibility IMO. I don't mean like, him winning a match or two either, I mean him winning the feud and moving on. What do you do after that? What use is a monster heel stable if they can't take out the top guy? They only have to do it once if it's done right. Btw, I'm not blaming Cena or trying to defend anyone for floundering. It's just that it's a trend I've noticed.
|
|