|
Post by poi zen rana on Sept 8, 2007 11:35:54 GMT -5
here is some good news about tna if anyone is interested.
it may seem like a small thing but i find it pretty cool that not only am i seeing no surrender advertisements on channels i have never seen tna advertise on, but the commercial running at least in this area features nothing but abyss hyping him up as a crazy monster. kurt is not in it, and it looks like they are using kurt to make abyss bigger in the company which could lead to them starting shift focus and giving back to those that have been there.
|
|
|
Post by blackstussyshirt on Sept 8, 2007 11:40:14 GMT -5
That would be great but none of that matters until they hire better camera men and increase production values.
The whole presentation screams B level and even the die hard TNA fans have to admit that.
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Sept 8, 2007 11:41:49 GMT -5
TNA is terrible. They are the jealous middle child of wrestling. Worst fed ever. WWE: Marsha Brady TNA: Jan Brady Chikara: Cindy Brady ROH: Greg
|
|
|
Post by thestinger on Sept 8, 2007 12:59:11 GMT -5
WWE: Marsha Brady TNA: Jan Brady Chikara: Cindy Brady ROH: Greg Wouldn't WWE be the old lady wrestler that WWE always brings out to disgust people? To me, (the only person whose opinion I care about) WWE is the minor leagues.
|
|
|
Post by heyguesswhatidid on Sept 8, 2007 13:01:45 GMT -5
WWE has the money and time for celebrities on there show.
Pacman eats up a big percentage of TNA's budget and weekly time.
When K-fed was on RAW, he took up 20 minuts of WWE's 5 weekly hours.
TNA on the other hand only has 1 hour and Pacman eats up 20 minutes of it.
|
|
|
Post by jcdenton on Sept 8, 2007 13:02:37 GMT -5
I think TNA just needs to get back to bread and butter, not wine and cheese.
|
|
|
Post by Spankymac is sick of the swiss on Sept 8, 2007 13:04:29 GMT -5
I think TNA just needs to get back to bread and butter, not wine and cheese. Kudos for both continuing on with the foot motif we've got going here, and for making basically the best point about what TNA should be doing, booking wise.
|
|
|
Post by "Nature Boy" Ric Moranis on Sept 8, 2007 13:05:28 GMT -5
WWE has the money and time for celebrities on there show. Pacman eats up a big percentage of TNA's budget and weekly time. When K-fed was on RAW, he took up 20 minuts of WWE's 5 weekly hours. TNA on the other hand only has 1 hour and Pacman eats up 20 minutes of it. Yeah, I couldn't believe that Pacman was on the show for twenty minutes this week. I was sitting there going, "Damnit, get this guy off my television screen!!!!!111!!!!!" He was on the show twice. For a total of roughly three minutes, and three minutes is being generous (because it seemed like less than that). He said one sentence backstage, and then spraypainted Angle at the end. That's hardly a fifth of the show.
|
|
|
Post by Pgarodactyl on Sept 8, 2007 13:07:19 GMT -5
WWE: Marsha Brady TNA: Jan Brady Chikara: Cindy Brady ROH: Greg Wouldn't WWE be the old lady wrestler that WWE always brings out to disgust people? To me, (the only person whose opinion I care about) WWE is the minor leagues. To me, that is a complete and total lie or blind mark BS. I haven't decided which.
|
|
|
Post by Nice Guy Cody on Sept 8, 2007 13:21:33 GMT -5
TNA is terrible. They are the jealous middle child of wrestling. Worst fed ever. The level of discourse in this thread is truly consciousness-expanding. Still, it re-affirms the point and purpose of the thread.
|
|
|
Post by lildude8218 on Sept 8, 2007 13:24:05 GMT -5
I think TNA just needs to get back to bread and butter, not wine and cheese. what about the Mahi Mahi?
|
|
|
Post by heyguesswhatidid on Sept 8, 2007 13:24:06 GMT -5
WWE has the money and time for celebrities on there show. Pacman eats up a big percentage of TNA's budget and weekly time. When K-fed was on RAW, he took up 20 minuts of WWE's 5 weekly hours. TNA on the other hand only has 1 hour and Pacman eats up 20 minutes of it. Yeah, I couldn't believe that Pacman was on the show for twenty minutes this week. I was sitting there going, "Damnit, get this guy off my television screen!!!!!111!!!!!" He was on the show twice. For a total of roughly three minutes, and three minutes is being generous (because it seemed like less than that). He said one sentence backstage, and then spraypainted Angle at the end. That's hardly a fifth of the show. How many times was he mentioned in commentary, that counts as eating up time as well. It's a company with plenty of wrestlers and a non-wrestler is getting a tag title shot with a guy who hasn't been on the air for like 3 months until Pacman came. I'd rather see LAX, MCMG, XXX, Team 3D, The Steiners or VKM get a tag title shot than a football player and a guy who was thrown in a team with him.
|
|
|
Post by thestinger on Sept 8, 2007 13:27:55 GMT -5
To me, that is a complete and total lie or blind mark BS. I haven't decided which. No, that is my opinion. Why would I lie about my own opinion? The entire point of a message board is to state your view. And like I've said before: a mark is a gullible fan who praises one product. Since I am a fan of all pro wrestling EXCEPT for Vince's twisted "entertainment" version (which could be called "non-entertaining Entertainment")-- I am the opposite of a mark. In the 90s I liked ECW and WCW, and today TNA and ROH. So how can I be a mark?
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Sept 8, 2007 13:28:08 GMT -5
WWE: Marsha Brady TNA: Jan Brady Chikara: Cindy Brady ROH: Greg Wouldn't WWE be the old lady wrestler that WWE always brings out to disgust people? To me, (the only person whose opinion I care about) WWE is the minor leagues. When was Mae Young on The Brady Bunch?! Also, it's hard to be the Minor Leagues when you're the best know company in the business.
|
|
|
Post by jcdenton on Sept 8, 2007 13:28:55 GMT -5
I think TNA just needs to get back to bread and butter, not wine and cheese. Kudos for both continuing on with the foot motif we've got going here, and for making basically the best point about what TNA should be doing, booking wise. food motif? what?
|
|
hollywood
King Koopa
the bullet dodger
The Green Arrow has approved this post.
Posts: 11,122
|
Post by hollywood on Sept 8, 2007 13:30:00 GMT -5
I suppose people are a little biased against TNA. I suppose it may have to do with bitterness from many for TNA not living up to what they wanted it to be, and the truth is they really don't know what that is. At best, they want TNA "to be different from WWE and not suck."
I could be wrong, though. I'm not a fan of the current TNA at all, either.
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Sept 8, 2007 13:33:05 GMT -5
TNA has wined and dined with kings and queens, but now is in the gutter eating pork and beans.
If you willlllllllllllll.
|
|
|
Post by thestinger on Sept 8, 2007 13:34:17 GMT -5
Also, it's hard to be the Minor Leagues when you're the best know company in the business. Re-read my quote. Pay special attention to the words, "To me" and the word "opinion." Whever I have seen WWE performers in the ring (and I don't watch) it doesn't equal the quality of TNA or ROH matches.
|
|
|
Post by heyguesswhatidid on Sept 8, 2007 13:35:21 GMT -5
Also, it's hard to be the Minor Leagues when you're the best know company in the business. Re-read my quote. Pay special attention to the words, "To me" and the word "opinion." Whever I have seen WWE performers in the ring (and I don't watch) it doesn't equal the quality of TNA or ROH matches. How do you form an opinion on something if you don't watch it?
|
|
|
Post by jcdenton on Sept 8, 2007 13:36:51 GMT -5
Also, it's hard to be the Minor Leagues when you're the best know company in the business. Re-read my quote. Pay special attention to the words, "To me" and the word "opinion." Whever I have seen WWE performers in the ring (and I don't watch) it doesn't equal the quality of TNA or ROH matches. Sorry man, I can respect (and hell I agree) about WWE being totally unentertaining, but to call it the minor leagues under ANY stretch of the imagination, is foolish, thats like me calling the NHL the minor leagues compared to WHL because I think WHL has better games.
|
|