Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2018 18:22:12 GMT -5
Again, I have no dog in the fight. I fully get that if I wanted to become a workers rights activist. Having this of all things be my cause would be the dumbest thing ever. Yes, this situation and the GRR wouldn't be 100% the same. But there are some similarities. Maybe they're 62.5% the same. The whole point is moot anyway as the way the WWE works is, they could just decide for no reason to give Roman Reigns a million dollar bonus and Charlotte a 2 cent bonus and it would be perfectly legal and no one could stop them. It just baffles me that some (Not all) have had such an emotional response at even the idea of the male talent having a paid day off.
|
|
Cranjis McBasketball
Crow T. Robot
Knew what the hell that thing was supposed to be
Peace Love and Nothing But
Posts: 42,088
|
Post by Cranjis McBasketball on Jul 14, 2018 19:07:27 GMT -5
Go crazy.
Not sure how well it’ll draw, they’ll want a big house, so they’ll book a super show and only go live for the women’s portion
|
|
Allie Kitsune
Crow T. Robot
Always Feelin' Foxy.
HaHa U FaLL 4 LaVa TriK
Posts: 46,382
|
Post by Allie Kitsune on Jul 14, 2018 19:17:56 GMT -5
I don't see any reason why not to do it.
Just don't beat us over the head with the "HOW HISTORIC!!!" stuff like that.
There's a saying, "Act like you've been there before".
You want it to stand on its own merits? Just put on the show and let your women's roster put on the best show that they can. They know it's important, and they'll do whatever it takes to put on the best show possible.
Just don't let commentary make a mess of it.
|
|
Zone Was Wrong
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Currently living off the high that AEW brings every Wednesday and Friday
Posts: 16,569
|
Post by Zone Was Wrong on Jul 14, 2018 19:24:50 GMT -5
Eh I just think of all the times in the past where not a woman's match was to be seen and think it's due. Curious how you'd book it though. Wouldn't mind some exhibition matches like Bayley vs Kari Sane or Asuka vs Bazsler
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2018 20:02:40 GMT -5
I'm not sure if this has been brought up but I hope they give it a decent name. I don't want something that's like "Women's Revolution" or anything that straight says it's an all-women's ppv in the title. Just give it a regular decent name as in making it subtle because that'll make a bigger impact. Like, they shouldn't keep using "historic" and "first time ever" when relating to women. Just straight up do it like you should have been done in the first place. Whatever name it is, give it a good one. Then again, this is the same company that gave us this. ![](http://www.diva-dirt.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/WM34WBRResults-696x397.jpg) Naomi's expression is perfect.
|
|
|
Post by Brandon Walsh is Insane. on Jul 16, 2018 12:18:22 GMT -5
Again, I have no dog in the fight. I fully get that if I wanted to become a workers rights activist. Having this of all things be my cause would be the dumbest thing ever. Yes, this situation and the GRR wouldn't be 100% the same. But there are some similarities. Maybe they're 62.5% the same. The whole point is moot anyway as the way the WWE works is, they could just decide for no reason to give Roman Reigns a million dollar bonus and Charlotte a 2 cent bonus and it would be perfectly legal and no one could stop them. It just baffles me that some (Not all) have had such an emotional response at even the idea of the male talent having a paid day off. I was with you until the 62.5% part... 63% or nothing!
|
|
Allie Kitsune
Crow T. Robot
Always Feelin' Foxy.
HaHa U FaLL 4 LaVa TriK
Posts: 46,382
|
Post by Allie Kitsune on Jul 16, 2018 13:25:38 GMT -5
I'm not sure if this has been brought up but I hope they give it a decent name. I don't want something that's like "Women's Revolution" or anything that straight says it's an all-women's ppv in the title. Just give it a regular decent name as in making it subtle because that'll make a bigger impact. Like, they shouldn't keep using "historic" and "first time ever" when relating to women. Just straight up do it like you should have been done in the first place. Whatever name it is, give it a good one. Then again, this is the same company that gave us this. ![](http://www.diva-dirt.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/WM34WBRResults-696x397.jpg) Naomi's expression is perfect. Knowing WWE, they'd pick a name that they _thought_ was fine, but because "Pro Wrestling Bubble" and nobody does any research, it'll actually turn out to be some sort of misogynistic insult that everyone was too behind-the-times to realize.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2018 13:35:58 GMT -5
I'm not sure if this has been brought up but I hope they give it a decent name. I don't want something that's like "Women's Revolution" or anything that straight says it's an all-women's ppv in the title. Just give it a regular decent name as in making it subtle because that'll make a bigger impact. Like, they shouldn't keep using "historic" and "first time ever" when relating to women. Just straight up do it like you should have been done in the first place. Whatever name it is, give it a good one. Then again, this is the same company that gave us this. ![](http://www.diva-dirt.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/WM34WBRResults-696x397.jpg) Naomi's expression is perfect. Knowing WWE, they'd pick a name that they _thought_ was fine, but because "Pro Wrestling Bubble" and nobody does any research, it'll actually turn out to be some sort of misogynistic insult that everyone was too behind-the-times to realize. Ugh remember that Submission Sorority thing? Uggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
|
|
Ben Wyatt
Crow T. Robot
Are You Gonna Go My Way?
I don't get it. At all. It's kind of a small horse, I mean what am I missing? Am I crazy?
Posts: 41,599
|
Post by Ben Wyatt on Jul 16, 2018 13:38:18 GMT -5
*Thinks about Carmella and Bliss both winning while making half of the women's roster look like ass*
Naw, I think I'm all set with trying this.
|
|