|
|
Post by The Tree of Woe on Oct 26, 2007 8:11:27 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2007 8:21:22 GMT -5
I find it hilarious that he said all that, but is doing currently everything he despises.
But hey, a job's a job, right?
|
|
Mr. Mediocre
Hank Scorpio
Bert Early?... sorry, that's a typo. Butt. Ugly.
Much better since I was last here.
Posts: 6,249
|
Post by Mr. Mediocre on Oct 26, 2007 8:28:56 GMT -5
I loved watching the "shoot" when it happened, but considering that he does every. last. thing. he complained about here on ECW, I basically have zero credibility in Styles. That probably wouldn't be the case if WWE hadn't had him cut this "shoot".
|
|
amaron
Samurai Cop
I yam what I yam.
Posts: 2,212 
|
Post by amaron on Oct 26, 2007 8:41:41 GMT -5
Well, don't forget that when he did this "shoot" ECW was supposed to be closer to what it used to be than it ended up being.
|
|
|
|
Post by willywonka666 on Oct 26, 2007 8:42:42 GMT -5
This was a fantastic shoot-shame how things turned out though
|
|
The QC Loser
Hank Scorpio
Come on follow my Twitter I'm cool!
Posts: 6,241
|
Post by The QC Loser on Oct 26, 2007 8:53:47 GMT -5
OH NO HE DIDN'T!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by machinegun on Oct 26, 2007 9:26:23 GMT -5
I'm not good enough to call BACKLASH!?!?!?!??
That was hilarious
|
|
|
|
Post by celtics543 on Oct 26, 2007 9:31:55 GMT -5
I loved this shoot so much. It was great, and in my opinion would have been even better if he had been surrounded by Heyman, Tazz, Stevie Richards, Dreamer, RVD, etc. Just so he could have had some other people to work with. It might have taken the shoot part out of it, but it still would have been a heck of a promo.
|
|
|
|
Post by texaswhopper on Oct 26, 2007 9:33:39 GMT -5
Let me show you how its done...
OH MY GAWWWWWDDDDD!
I still laugh it that. LOL Ha ha ha
|
|
|
|
Post by maxx420 on Oct 26, 2007 9:38:50 GMT -5
I loved watching the "shoot" when it happened, but considering that he does every. last. thing. he complained about here on ECW, I basically have zero credibility in Styles. That probably wouldn't be the case if WWE hadn't had him cut this "shoot". Yeah, it's too bad. This "shoot" has an extremely hypocritical ring to it now... |
|
|
|
Post by pathogen on Oct 26, 2007 9:51:19 GMT -5
I thought this was great at the time. Now, you could cut the hypocrisy with a knife!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2007 10:30:30 GMT -5
I'm not good enough to announce backlash? I WIPE MY ASS WITH BACKLASH DAMN IT!
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Daddy Bad Booking on Oct 26, 2007 10:43:32 GMT -5
I thought this was great at the time. Now, you could cut the hypocrisy with a knife! Awesome. |
|
The Ichi
Patti Mayonnaise
AGGRESSIVE Executive Janitor of the Third Floor Manager's Bathroom
Posts: 37,706
|
Post by The Ichi on Oct 26, 2007 10:45:10 GMT -5
Meh, he's not a hypocrie just because he still has bills to pay.
|
|
|
|
Post by joeman on Oct 26, 2007 10:50:16 GMT -5
I loved watching the "shoot" when it happened, but considering that he does every. last. thing. he complained about here on ECW, I basically have zero credibility in Styles. That probably wouldn't be the case if WWE hadn't had him cut this "shoot". Well considering that this "shoot" is a tool to build up the ECW brand rather than Joey Styles personal feelings, I don't think Styles is being hypocritical. Many wrestlers and on-screen personalities have contradicted to what they say, so this isn't a big deal, especially on a fake sport such as wrestling. Whoever says Joey Styles is a hypocrite or he "sold out" need to think that he has family to take care of, and would rather work for a company where he is guaranteed financial and personal security rather than keeping his old beliefs and struggling to make ends meat. |
|
|
|
Post by pathogen on Oct 26, 2007 10:51:33 GMT -5
Meh, he's not a hypocrie just because he still has bills to pay. No. not at all. But if he were going to contradict himself so badly, he shouldn't've said it all in the first place, no matter how much money Vince paid him to do so. |
|
|
|
Post by joeman on Oct 26, 2007 10:53:01 GMT -5
Meh, he's not a hypocrie just because he still has bills to pay. No. not at all. But if he were going to contradict himself so badly, he shouldn't've said it all in the first place, no matter how much money Vince paid him to do so. There may be a HUGE possibility that it was all scripted, can't it? |
|
Hiroshi Hase
Patti Mayonnaise
The Good Ol' Days
Posts: 30,755
|
Post by Hiroshi Hase on Oct 26, 2007 10:54:35 GMT -5
No. not at all. But if he were going to contradict himself so badly, he shouldn't've said it all in the first place, no matter how much money Vince paid him to do so. There may be a HUGE possibility that it was all scripted, can't it? Certainly it was, and I'm sure at the time they had designs on making the ECW product somewhat resemble the old one, but in retrospect it is hypocritical if you're going by that particular promo. Not saying there's anything wrong with staying on in WWE or anything, but if you're going by the storyline he's doing everything that he was against. |
|
|
|
Post by maxx420 on Oct 26, 2007 10:55:05 GMT -5
Meh, he's not a hypocrie just because he still has bills to pay. No. not at all. But if he were going to contradict himself so badly, he shouldn't've said it all in the first place, no matter how much money Vince paid him to do so. Exactly. Nowadays one can hear Styles refer to wrestlers as "blue-chippers" & use other such J.R.-isms. It won't be too long 'til he's reffering to Big Daddy V as being "Pet Coon Goofy". |
|
Mr. Mediocre
Hank Scorpio
Bert Early?... sorry, that's a typo. Butt. Ugly.
Much better since I was last here.
Posts: 6,249
|
Post by Mr. Mediocre on Oct 26, 2007 10:57:30 GMT -5
No. not at all. But if he were going to contradict himself so badly, he shouldn't've said it all in the first place, no matter how much money Vince paid him to do so. There may be a HUGE possibility that it was all scripted, can't it? Of course it's scripted, but the scripting made him later look like a huge hypocrite with no credibility. |
|
