|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 20, 2014 14:14:22 GMT -5
Paige hasn't been "The Anti-Diva" going on a year or so now.
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 20, 2014 14:03:18 GMT -5
It's been done but doesn't really work. Thing about Alberto was he never could get the better of ol' Sheamus, meanwhile AJ and Paige trade custody of their championship every other match.
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 15, 2014 2:58:41 GMT -5
Nikki making Brie her batch of almond butter & oats cookies doesn't sound half bad at all.
Oh.
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 14, 2014 14:37:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 14, 2014 14:31:17 GMT -5
It's Bayley! With Zada!
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 14, 2014 14:08:55 GMT -5
I fully admit to being biased about Taker. This story has always made me roll my eyes. Anyway... Didn't Austin himself outright deny this had happened in the past? Austin's said he heard about it from the boys in the back. Don't know if he says he outright saw it in the podcast.
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 14, 2014 14:01:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 14, 2014 13:31:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 12, 2014 8:18:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 9, 2014 14:04:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 9, 2014 13:41:55 GMT -5
I think t-shirts, Chucks, old lady dresses and denim runs the gamut of AJ's wardrobe spectrum.
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 9, 2014 13:35:30 GMT -5
Here it is. It's worth a listen. - The interviewer saying the Bellas are more deserving of a HIAC match than Ambrose/Rollins is laughable. - ...Especially since the interviewer and Nikki agree that the angle with Brie is very repetitive. Dollars to donuts it's Rosenberg, isn't it? *click* HAHA! Sycophant.
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 9, 2014 13:28:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 9, 2014 11:35:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 9, 2014 11:34:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 9, 2014 11:21:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 9, 2014 9:50:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 9, 2014 9:42:42 GMT -5
Which was done to spite her, or so theorized Alvarez. The NEWZ-arazzi who think this way have to cling to the idea of Punk as a Jesus Figure who "died for us (and Daniel Bryan)", and therefore have to cling to a narrative of AJ being persecuted as his surrogate, even though WWE isn't persecuting her at all. Yes, this feud with Paige is horrible. But that's because WWE booking, in general, is horrible. I dunno. I don't think the boys at the Observer have a particular affinity towards Punk and AJ. Meltzer probably wouldn't call a Messianic figure a belt mark, though nothing is finalized and plans can change.
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 9, 2014 7:14:48 GMT -5
Why do people have to associate everything AJ does with CM Punk? The crowd chants are what they are, and they typically fade pretty quickly, but it really irks me how everyone from the top news reporters to the average commentator can't wrap their heads around the fact that WWE like AJ just fine and don't hold her accountable for the guy she married. Pretty much. It's like they think she's Rosa Mendes and can't win a match to save her life as opposed to become a champion twice-over since marrying him.Which was done to spite her, or so theorized Alvarez.
|
|
|
Post by Saiyanic Panic on Oct 9, 2014 5:42:03 GMT -5
Yeah, I definitely think they'll fire AJ for chants they've at times encouraged and Stephanie's acknowledged for heat.
They chant for the announcers too, don't they? Sweet.
|
|