Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 25, 2008 18:05:09 GMT -5
Where is this report from Meltzer from? It's not in the observer. on the wrestling observer radio show google the one for the 23rd nov Thanks, I found it.
|
|
|
Post by Snitsky on Nov 25, 2008 18:14:00 GMT -5
on the wrestling observer radio show google the one for the 23rd nov Thanks, I found it. ;D you thought i was faking huh?- good thing google is your friend
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 25, 2008 18:33:39 GMT -5
;D you thought i was faking huh?- good thing google is your friend I think anyone is faking if they don't provide the source in their original post. It's almost silly not to, since it's done to death over and over.
|
|
mrjl
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,319
|
Post by mrjl on Nov 25, 2008 19:00:57 GMT -5
The NFL idea sucks... Unless a Redskin is involved. Then I fully approve well on the one hand Clinton Portis has the flamboyance to get into wrestling. On the other hand Lorenzo Alexander does everything else for the Skins defense, offense, special teams maybe he should represent them in the wrestling ring
|
|
mrjl
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,319
|
Post by mrjl on Nov 25, 2008 19:01:55 GMT -5
I am gonna hold off on judging the Team NFL idea, since Show vs. Mayweather was entertaining as well as Lawrence Taylor vs. Bam Bam. If they grab some good athletes and give them a few months to train for a multi-man tag match, it could be decent. Not trying to pee in your corn flakes but LT Vs Bam Bam was anything but entertaining. I saw it live at the Civic Center in Hartford CT. Salt N Peppa sang what a man for LT's intro and the crowd was absolutely dead for two reasons. LT was a big enough name that EVERYONE and I do mean EVERYONE knew he had retired from the NFL due to his bad knees. The other side of it was that all the NFL players who came as his back up gang were physically bigger then the wrestlers Bam Bam brought. This killed the credibility of the wrestlers and then LT did some basic moves and a body slam to pin the Beast of the East. I didnt see show vs mayweather but LT vs Bam Bam was NOT entertaining. Uh, he pinned Bigelow after a move off the second rope
|
|
|
Post by macdaddysquid on Nov 25, 2008 19:03:39 GMT -5
Lets pray meltzer is wrong (again)
|
|
|
Post by Chuckie Finster on Nov 25, 2008 19:07:39 GMT -5
The reason for Austin/Cena talk is that is what the WWE wants. Of course Austin would like one more big match and WWE has been pushing for him to come back for WM25, but it's really a toss up if Austin actually goes through with it.
|
|
The Ichi
Patti Mayonnaise
AGGRESSIVE Executive Janitor of the Third Floor Manager's Bathroom
Posts: 37,299
|
Post by The Ichi on Nov 25, 2008 19:14:15 GMT -5
I'd rather see Rock/Cena than Austin/Cena myself.
|
|
|
Post by macdaddysquid on Nov 25, 2008 19:17:22 GMT -5
I would rather not see either rock or austin. How about Y2J Cena? I dont eithe of them "passing the torchfact is it is unecessary. Cena is already God of the wwe universe hy job legends to him? f***ing stupid. How about HOgan Cena? I can believe that one
|
|
|
Post by DrizzlinShytes on Nov 25, 2008 19:18:30 GMT -5
How about Austin/HBK?
|
|
|
Post by peopleschamp on Nov 25, 2008 19:20:43 GMT -5
Its the Trips/Taker thing that bugs me. It serves no purpose it either man. HBK/Taker for the match/build or even Taker against Umaga just for something new. Thing is where to fit in Trips though? Dont want to see him involved in WWE Title Match, MitB is out of the question, only possible I can see him doing is being more involved with the Shane/Steph Power Struggle thing as it leads to Mania but dont know who he'd face.
|
|
|
Post by KingPopper on Nov 25, 2008 19:25:21 GMT -5
John Cena vs. Austin - Fine makes sence.
Batista vs. Orton - Why??
Triple H vs. Taker - No, already happened at Wrestlemania, put HBK in there instead.
Edge vs. Jeff Hardy - Makes sence then if they resign Christian he can feud with Matt. Just like the old days.
NFL vs. WWE - Will the NFL guys be allowed to touch anybody?
|
|
Mac
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Sigs/Avatars cannot exceed 1MB
Posts: 16,502
|
Post by Mac on Nov 25, 2008 20:05:32 GMT -5
Im strongly hoping they do HBK/Taker at Mania, that ones overdue.
|
|
|
Post by boxieness on Nov 25, 2008 22:41:30 GMT -5
I'd rather see Rock/Cena than Austin/Cena myself. The world would wana cena/ rock as at this point if the rock returned for a wrestlemania match, them edia would be all over it! Besdies from a work standpoint rock and cena would probably be better. if austin wants a last match it's gotta be good and i don't know if this would be good. But if that's the line-up and you replace Cena with HBK, assuming the rock cannot make mania. What would they do with cena? Prolly a clustersmurf threeway with cena orton and tista but i for one don't love the ol triple threats at mania. I'm like lex luger... I DONT KNOW
|
|
|
Post by El Hijo del Havoc on Nov 25, 2008 23:37:56 GMT -5
I'm probably the only person that doesn't want HBK/Undertaker at Wrestlemania
|
|
|
Post by thedavefather on Nov 27, 2008 15:43:09 GMT -5
i can't believe anyone doesn't want Taker vs HBK at WM. Plain and simple it makes sense and it is over due!
|
|
|
Post by Mayonnaise on Nov 27, 2008 15:47:49 GMT -5
i can't believe anyone doesn't want Taker vs HBK at WM. Plain and simple it makes sense and it is over due! While the match would no doubt be good, to me, there would be little to no suspense.
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Nov 27, 2008 15:50:59 GMT -5
Would ANYONE really carry suspense with the match though? If HHH didn't beat Taker in 01, he sure as hell won't now. Edge didn't last year even though I thought he should. Kane is laughable. At this point just go for the best match.
The only guy I can see going in to Mania against Taker where people will give him a real shot is John Cena, and I'm willing to bet that will be main eventing Mania 26.
They still have Taker/Jericho in their pockets too. It wouldn't be suspenseful, but I'd love to eventually see it.
|
|