Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2020 9:24:49 GMT -5
An R-Rated Tarantino Star Trek sounds like a bigger betrayal of the source material than both Abrams movies.
|
|
|
Post by BlackoutCreature on Aug 8, 2020 10:00:54 GMT -5
If you want to make a violent and vulgar Star Trek movie, then make a violent and vulgar Star Trek movie. Don't just send them to the 1930's so you can make a violent and vulgar old-timey mobster movie that just so happens to include Star Trek characters.
|
|
|
Post by The Thread Barbi on Aug 8, 2020 10:15:41 GMT -5
If you want to make a violent and vulgar Star Trek movie, then make a violent and vulgar Star Trek movie. Don't just send them to the 1930's so you can make a violent and vulgar old-timey mobster movie that just so happens to include Star Trek characters. Tarantino's fascination with 1930s to 1960s movie making and overstating its importance kind of takes me out of the movie at times. Inglorious Bastards is an example without spoilers.
|
|
camphor #BLM
Don Corleone
It's Skull-Sorcerer vs Super Sorcerer in a legendary LEG BAT battle!
Posts: 1,448
|
Post by camphor #BLM on Aug 8, 2020 12:30:56 GMT -5
Thread Response: Camphor will watch no such thing. Thread Response, Supplemental: Has someone already made the joke about Tarantino revisiting this species from Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country, perhaps this time played by a comely young space-lady?
|
|
|
Post by Cyno on Aug 8, 2020 13:40:14 GMT -5
A Piece Of The Action was a fun, goofy episode of The Original Series, but I can't help but feel Tarantino would completely miss the point of what made it a fun episode.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2020 1:07:00 GMT -5
Be hardly the first Star Trek movie to be centered around time travel (hell, top of my head I can think of three others, four if you want to count Generations), but that's pretty much just another reason not to do it.
|
|
|
Post by BlackoutCreature on Aug 10, 2020 7:07:34 GMT -5
Be hardly the first Star Trek movie to be centered around time travel (hell, top of my head I can think of three others, four if you want to count Generations), but that's pretty much just another reason not to do it. I have no problem with a Star Trek time travel movie. I have a problem with a Star Trek movie where time travel is used as an excuse for characters to be incredibly violent and drop N-bombs.
|
|
|
Post by Zaq "That Guy" Buzzkill on Aug 10, 2020 13:12:41 GMT -5
Be hardly the first Star Trek movie to be centered around time travel (hell, top of my head I can think of three others, four if you want to count Generations), but that's pretty much just another reason not to do it. I have no problem with a Star Trek time travel movie. I have a problem with a Star Trek movie where time travel is used as an excuse for characters to be incredibly violent and drop N-bombs. Plot twist: The only N-word is said by Spock.
|
|
Welfare Willis
Crow T. Robot
Pornomancer 555-BONE FDIC Bonsured
Game Center CX Kacho on!
Posts: 44,259
|
Post by Welfare Willis on Aug 10, 2020 14:26:21 GMT -5
An R-Rated Tarantino Star Trek sounds like a bigger betrayal of the source material than both Abrams movies. I don't know. Given that both Abrams "Star" series had good starts and flamed out pretty badly, I can at least accept Tarantino. If he's involved in the project it might actually be better because he is a better writer/director than JJ... although both guys lean into their own nostaglia a bit much. Also with QT there's almost no chance for a sequel.
|
|