|
Post by slappy on Apr 5, 2014 4:05:27 GMT -5
No, but Charles Robinson will.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 5, 2014 2:08:53 GMT -5
Saw Dusty Rhodes, Harley race, Rusev, billy gunn , carlito, bray Wyatt, Bret hart, lita masato tanaka... Legends House 2 cast.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 5, 2014 1:49:30 GMT -5
She better bring Russo with her.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 4, 2014 19:33:01 GMT -5
I've had issues with quality with both on demand and live stream. And the live stream does randomly freeze. But I want to know why they took away being able to rewind the live stream. On my PS3 and PS4, I am still able to rewind the live stream (just tried it now to be sure). I'm using my laptop and it had been there but they took it away the other day.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 4, 2014 19:05:00 GMT -5
I've had issues with quality with both on demand and live stream.
And the live stream does randomly freeze.
But I want to know why they took away being able to rewind the live stream.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 3, 2014 2:31:03 GMT -5
Wisconsin - The Crusher
He's the man who made Milwaukee famous.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 1, 2014 23:44:52 GMT -5
Anyone looking to keep HAW going forever can go to their profile -> Edit Profile -> Settings -> Forum Theme -> HAW The theme was the same as before but the Triple H logo remains. Will there be a theme just like the one before April Fools but with the regular logo?
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 1, 2014 18:36:39 GMT -5
He's looking like Avicii.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 1, 2014 1:56:52 GMT -5
I'm more offended he mentioned the betting site.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 31, 2014 23:49:24 GMT -5
In an ironic twist, a spiteful Jay Lethal will ruin her wedding. He'll tombstone a Pepsi truck driver?
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 31, 2014 14:11:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 30, 2014 21:40:28 GMT -5
Otunga
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 30, 2014 19:17:03 GMT -5
Nash. He's one of my all time favorites.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 30, 2014 17:57:19 GMT -5
vs Shawn Michaels on Raw December 29, 2003
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 30, 2014 5:43:21 GMT -5
I don't believe so. Jeff had more success as a singles guy in roughly the year before losing to Taker than he had the year after losing. Before - 1 IC, 1 Lightheavyweight and 2 Hardcore reigns. After - 1 European and 1 Hardcore reign. the Light Heavyweight title was put on guys like Gillberg, the IC title win was a fluke, lasted for a week and ended in a squash When you look at the title history you see Jeff Hardy - IC champion. You don't see Jeff Hardy - fluke win and lost in a squash. Just like you see in the record books John Cena - winner and not Damien Sandow (or whoever) - winner in defeat.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 30, 2014 0:05:41 GMT -5
Visa issues?
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 29, 2014 22:38:43 GMT -5
I have not backed down. I still don't believe it exists. Most of your responses to me have been saying what I've said isn't relevant. I agree that doesn't need to continue. No one did say that but people keep trying to prop up the myth of looking good in defeat as an excuse as to why WWE doesn't let guys who should win win. You don't believe it exists despite the multiple examples we've listed, which you've only attempted to debunk by using examples of booking either before or after those specific matches and as such are irrelevant? Okay then. None of us are using it as an excuse for that either. I think Bray should beat Cena, I think WWE are terrible for letting guys lose in situations they shouldn't lose in, and also frequently fail to book it so the losing party looks good in defeat. Doesn't mean that looking good in defeat doesn't exist. Mick Foley made a career out of looking good in defeat. That makes no sense. How can you say someone looks good in defeat and then disregard what happens to them after the match? Looking good for a few minutes after the match is over means nothing if they don't look even better going forward. Jeff lost to Taker but he had less accomplishments than he did before he lost. And Cena beat Taker before losing to him. You can't say he looks good in defeat when he's already beaten the guy. Beating Taker helps more than losing to him. You cannot say that's irrelevant because before and after does matter. I didn't say you were using it as an excuse. But it is paraded around the board.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 29, 2014 22:23:50 GMT -5
I think once Vince is out of the picture and Triple H and Stephanie get rid of Kevin Dunn things will be a lot better and we'll see what HHH can really do. He'll surprise us even more than he has and some of his detractors will come around.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 29, 2014 22:19:04 GMT -5
You have basically already backed down on your original point, the one I disagreed with, which is that there was no such thing as looking good losing, so there's no point continuing that line of discussion. And that last post you are just plucking examples out of the air. No one said that all losses makes someone look better, can certainly no one said that looking good in defeat is better than winning. I have not backed down. I still don't believe it exists. Most of your responses to me have been saying what I've said isn't relevant. I agree that doesn't need to continue. No one did say that but people keep trying to prop up the myth of looking good in defeat as an excuse as to why WWE doesn't let guys who should win win.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 29, 2014 22:13:51 GMT -5
Of course it's relevant. If Jeff was a bigger star after the loss to Taker then he should have won the world title. He didn't. He left. He came back and it still took 2 1/2 years. Jeff may have been super over (he was quite over before losing to Taker) but it didn't help him gain anything in the company. How can you (or the other poster) point to losing to Taker as helping Cena after Cena already beat Taker? Beating Taker helps more than losing to him. How can you (or the other poster) point to losing to Taker as helping Cena after Cena beat Jericho? Beating Jericho helps more than losing to Taker. Jeff was a tag team star but lower carder as a singles guy. Taker made him a viable singles star I don't believe so. Jeff had more success as a singles guy in roughly the year before losing to Taker than he had the year after losing. Before - 1 IC, 1 Lightheavyweight and 2 Hardcore reigns. After - 1 European and 1 Hardcore reign.
|
|