|
Post by slappy on Mar 15, 2014 23:08:13 GMT -5
Superstars would be fine if they didn't spend the majority of it on recaps.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 15, 2014 21:43:21 GMT -5
Say it to his face.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 15, 2014 20:53:00 GMT -5
Wouldn't have had LT vs Bam Bam go on last.
I would have had HHH win at WrestleMania 20.
Cena would have beat Rock at 28.
WM 29 would have been Punk vs Cena.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 15, 2014 20:01:07 GMT -5
I like the idea of Kane inducting and Taker accepting.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 15, 2014 17:10:49 GMT -5
I'd say the fact that they taped two shows with only a total of four matches is definitely a sign of Russo influence, and it leaves a lot of time for stupid backstage segments that Russo loves. These are two half shows, as noted above. The rest is being taped tomorrow. Instead of taping half shows, why don't they tape one full show each day?
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 14, 2014 23:11:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 14, 2014 23:02:27 GMT -5
Complete fake. No chance he'd fly under the radar like that on Twitter for 4 days and considering UFC is in Dallas this week and not LA (Where he is for Talking Dead on Sunday), this reeks of a poor attempt of trolling. But he's definitely confirming the account during Talking Dead.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 14, 2014 22:04:52 GMT -5
Thank you Bobby Lashley.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 14, 2014 20:10:30 GMT -5
The disembodied heads in the Bohemian Rhapsody video.
Green Jelly's Three Little Pigs song. It was the guy's voice that scared me.
The Undertaker.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 14, 2014 2:23:18 GMT -5
It was the Sandman that Vince was pretty high on, apparently Vince really liked all of the old ECW wrestlers and bought into Heyman's hype. I can just imagine Vince sitting in front of his TV. "EXIT LIGHT, ENTER NIGHT, TAKE MY HAND, OFF TO NEVER NEVER LAND. Now hit him with the god damn cane you drunk son of a bitch."
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 14, 2014 2:15:59 GMT -5
WrestleMania 10 only has two matches in which all competitors are still alive (Womens match and Ladder match). WrestleManias 1-17 all feature at least one dead wrestler meaning WrestleMania 18 is the earliest WrestleMania to have all alive competitors. With Mr. Perfect having had a match on Heat, if you count it then there isn't a Mania where everyone on the card is still alive until 21. Edit: I'm an idiot, checking what Mania it really is now. Be a sec. Looks like 25.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 14, 2014 2:02:57 GMT -5
WrestleMania 10 only has two matches in which all competitors are still alive (Womens match and Ladder match).
WrestleManias 1-17 all feature at least one dead wrestler meaning WrestleMania 18 is the earliest WrestleMania to have all alive competitors.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 13, 2014 23:13:28 GMT -5
When I said "could be enough to cause lasting damage" I didn't mean to their reputation. I meant actually harming someone. It only takes one time to drive drunk and hurt someone. It's not like you don't hurt anyone until your third or fourth time doing it. I have nothing against Chris Pine. I'm only doing this to show how hypocritical people are. I... See, I wasn't talking about his reputation either. I am talking in general. You are using 'could' as a hinge statement to hang a man. That is illogical. That is where I am taking umbrage. Further there is no hypocrisy. There is context. Chris Pine's actions are happening in a different context than Justin Bieber's, as such there are different judgements to be made, differ conclusions drawn. We are not equal. Ever. You mentioned public opinion so I took that as talking about his reputation. My could statement was not about him, it was a general statement about drunk drivers. The context is both drove under the influence but one is severely hated and one people either like or feel indifferent about. The one that's hated will get all the condemnation people can bring down upon him while the other won't even cross their mind. And this isn't about Chris Pine, if it was Patrick Stewart or another liked celebrity getting a DUI I would have made the same post and pointed out the hypocrisy there.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 13, 2014 22:18:48 GMT -5
I agree with your assessment of that statement. It was ridiculous when said after Bieber was arrested, it's ridiculous now. But we shouldn't lessen the severity of what Pine did. Driving under the influence is stupid and reckless. We shouldn't condemn a guy who drove drunk once and injures someone less than someone who drove drunk four times and injured no one. It doesn't matter how many times you have done bad things, once could be enough to cause lasting damage. Except you used 'could' again. I get it, I get it, court of public opinion can hold court over the possible ramifications of actions taken. I understand that. ...It doesn't make it less stupid. Listen, I have no sympathy for Chris Pine. He is moderately wealthy, or ought to be. Enough so that he can afford to get a taxi pretty much anywhere, but the important thing is that he did NOT harm anyone, despite making a piss poor judgement call while IMPAIRED. He is not a mustache twirling villain. That is the take away. A single lapse in judgement that causes no harm to others, while not to be lauded, does not need to be a point of vilification. No one sets out, while cackling maniacally, to drive as drunk as possible. When I said "could be enough to cause lasting damage" I didn't mean to their reputation. I meant actually harming someone. It only takes one time to drive drunk and hurt someone. It's not like you don't hurt anyone until your third or fourth time doing it. I have nothing against Chris Pine. I'm only doing this to show how hypocritical people are.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 13, 2014 19:06:58 GMT -5
She loses a squash match to Ultimate Warrior.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 13, 2014 18:48:53 GMT -5
Tell that to the people Pine could have killed. That same sentence (obviously with Bieber's name) was said when he was arrested. People just like to attack those they dislike and ignore the bad things that others they may like or feel indifferent about do. I never said Pine is forgiven, the question was why was he treated differently than Bieber. I answered. I have nothing against you or anyone in this thread. I just wish people would either condemn all who get a DUI or none; don't pick and choose who gets attacked for it.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 13, 2014 18:28:10 GMT -5
Also wasn't Bieber racing a lambo while intoxicated? No. TMZ got the rental car info and it showed he was not.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 13, 2014 18:27:41 GMT -5
Tell that to the people Pine could have killed. That same sentence (obviously with Bieber's name) was said when he was arrested. People just like to attack those they dislike and ignore the bad things that others they may like or feel indifferent about do. In the immortal words of so many others: "Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh." Bias is a powerful thing, it enables rationalizing away things that should be let to stand. But, using the line "Tell that to the people <blank> could have killed," is moronic. It is inflammatory, and not based in logic. Chris Pine made a mistake, we are willing to forgive him because he hasn't shown a repeated pattern of behavior that would make people not want to. If you do not want to be so forgiving to him, by all means. What he did was irresponsible. I agree with your assessment of that statement. It was ridiculous when said after Bieber was arrested, it's ridiculous now. But we shouldn't lessen the severity of what Pine did. Driving under the influence is stupid and reckless. We shouldn't condemn a guy who drove drunk once and injures someone less than someone who drove drunk four times and injured no one. It doesn't matter how many times you have done bad things, once could be enough to cause lasting damage. Why no outrage like when Justin Bieber was arrested? Where's Jared Padalecki's tweet about what an awful person Chris Pine is? Where's the insane media coverage? Pine and Bieber were both driving under the influence. They both could have killed someone. Yet Chris Pine seems to get a pass and some hilarious comments. It's not wrong to be less condemning of someone who doesn't have a history of dangerous and concerning behavior than you would be of someone who does when they commit the same act. There is, in fact, room for a slight degree of nuance on the internet. Also, one person is much more famous then the other, so there's that. But never mind all that, I'll let you get back to sticking it to the hypocrites. Maybe this is just the first act of many that will follow, who knows. If that's true, and I hope it's not, then I hope people will be more condemning. However, being less famous doesn't lessen the severity of what he did.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 13, 2014 16:54:02 GMT -5
Why no outrage like when Justin Bieber was arrested? Where's Jared Padalecki's tweet about what an awful person Chris Pine is? Where's the insane media coverage? Pine and Bieber were both driving under the influence. They both could have killed someone. Yet Chris Pine seems to get a pass and some hilarious comments. It is an isolated incident and not a behavior pattern. Tell that to the people Pine could have killed. That same sentence (obviously with Bieber's name) was said when he was arrested. People just like to attack those they dislike and ignore the bad things that others they may like or feel indifferent about do.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 13, 2014 15:20:06 GMT -5
They had had them and Los Matadores on the roster page but they have now only have Los Matadores.
|
|