BigJerichool222
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
THE BIG DOG!
#NotInMySalad
Posts: 17,424
|
Post by BigJerichool222 on Jan 28, 2015 20:12:07 GMT -5
Daniel Bryan vs Dolph Ziggler is stupid; sure it'll be a good match but there will be literally nothing at stake. Why would I want to watch a match where it doesn't matter who wins? The story will literally be LET'S STEAL THE SHOW, which is indy-level bullshit.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrtuesday on Jan 28, 2015 20:13:23 GMT -5
They should bring Money in the Bank back and have Bryan win. I noticed this on Wreddit earlier, thought some of you might be interested... Outside of Daniel Bryan vs. Ziggler and the intrigue of seeing Sting wrestle in a WWE ring, I can't say this excites me. It's there. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2015 20:13:27 GMT -5
I just don't see how Taker/Bray helps anyone. Bray loses, he won't be another streak victim, so who cares. Taker loses, Bray didn't end the streak, so you beat Undertaker at Wrestlemania and it means nothing. The only match with Taker that would make sense is Sting vs. Taker and even then, that'll be good for the entrances alone.
|
|
|
|
Post by 1 Free Moon-Down with Burger on Jan 28, 2015 20:14:11 GMT -5
Daniel Bryan vs Dolph Ziggler is stupid; sure it'll be a good match but there will be literally nothing at stake. Why would I want to watch a match where it doesn't matter who wins? The story will literally be LET'S STEAL THE SHOW, which is indy-level bullshit. Agreed and to me it sorta screams 'Hey! Wrestling is fake yo! Watch as these two guys work together to have the best match possible!' I'm sure the match would be fine but....eh. I guess? I like matches with SOME kind of story beyond 'Two wrestlers wrestling because they can wrestle good'. |
|
|
|
Post by Diamond Cutter Out of Nowhere! on Jan 28, 2015 20:15:17 GMT -5
I would watch Ziggler vs. Bryan in a heartbeat. That could easily steal the show.
|
|
gbo86
Mephisto
Posts: 684 
|
Post by gbo86 on Jan 28, 2015 20:18:32 GMT -5
I just don't see how Taker/Bray helps anyone. Bray loses, he won't be another streak victim, so who cares. Taker loses, Bray didn't end the streak, so you beat Undertaker at Wrestlemania and it means nothing. The only match with Taker that would make sense is Sting vs. Taker and even then, that'll be good for the entrances alone. I agree. I'm a Taker mark through and through and would love to see him back just because it's Taker, but I don't know how you book this one. It really seems like either outcome would have its disadvantages. |
|
|
|
Post by Andrew is Good on Jan 28, 2015 20:20:17 GMT -5
Yeah, all those matches I was thinking would happen. Good to see them going with Ziggler vs Bryan. It puts them in a position where they can have a Wrestlemania classic, even with Bryan lower on the card then before.
|
|
|
|
Post by angryfan on Jan 28, 2015 20:25:08 GMT -5
Daniel Bryan vs Dolph Ziggler is stupid; sure it'll be a good match but there will be literally nothing at stake. Why would I want to watch a match where it doesn't matter who wins? The story will literally be LET'S STEAL THE SHOW, which is indy-level bullshit. Agreed and to me it sorta screams 'Hey! Wrestling is fake yo! Watch as these two guys work together to have the best match possible!' I'm sure the match would be fine but....eh. I guess? I like matches with SOME kind of story beyond 'Two wrestlers wrestling because they can wrestle good'. I guess I can see that, but here's the problem. At present, all either of them have is "We're getting screwed over, we're popular but they wont' give us a match, so we're going to wrestle each other". To me that's "Let's make sure we get paid, and make them listen tot he crowed cheer for us" rather than Indy-level bullshit. |
|
|
|
Post by 1 Free Moon-Down with Burger on Jan 28, 2015 20:28:01 GMT -5
Agreed and to me it sorta screams 'Hey! Wrestling is fake yo! Watch as these two guys work together to have the best match possible!' I'm sure the match would be fine but....eh. I guess? I like matches with SOME kind of story beyond 'Two wrestlers wrestling because they can wrestle good'. I guess I can see that, but here's the problem. At present, all either of them have is "We're getting screwed over, we're popular but they wont' give us a match, so we're going to wrestle each other". To me that's "Let's make sure we get paid, and make them listen tot he crowed cheer for us" rather than Indy-level bullshit. But in kayfabe all it'll prove to the Authority is that one B player can beat another. They wouldn't really be showing anyone anything by killing eachother in a match. |
|
fw91
Crow T. Robot
FAN Idol All-Star: FAN Idol Season X and *Gavel* 2x Judges' Throwdown winner
Tribe has spoken for 2024 Mets
Posts: 40,050
|
Post by fw91 on Jan 28, 2015 20:29:11 GMT -5
Ziggler/Bryan will be great as long as its face/face and not treated as a curtain jerker in terms of build up
|
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Jan 28, 2015 20:30:08 GMT -5
Daniel Bryan vs Dolph Ziggler is stupid; sure it'll be a good match but there will be literally nothing at stake. Why would I want to watch a match where it doesn't matter who wins? The story will literally be LET'S STEAL THE SHOW, which is indy-level bullshit. Stakes don't mean much anymore. Remember the stakes at Survivor Series? They lasted about four weeks. WWE are so useless at writing storylines, Ziggler and Bryan might be best served simply having a showpiece match with no plotline accompanying it. |
|
|
|
Post by Hobby Drifter on Jan 28, 2015 20:34:39 GMT -5
So...HHH and Sting are going to close Wrestlemania...in 2015?
|
|
cherry coloured funk
ALF
discontinue the trout
I know that when I wear Ban-Lon, there does appear to be some jiggling...
Posts: 1,211
|
Post by cherry coloured funk on Jan 28, 2015 20:35:12 GMT -5
Daniel Bryan vs Dolph Ziggler is stupid; sure it'll be a good match but there will be literally nothing at stake. Why would I want to watch a match where it doesn't matter who wins? The story will literally be LET'S STEAL THE SHOW, which is indy-level bullshit. I don't know. Wasn't that literally the exact storyline for Benoit v. Angle at WM17? Those guys ended up doing alright for themselves... Well, until... y'know. But given that Bryan/Ziggler have about 15 years between them in WWE... it does reek a bit of pointless busy-work. |
|
|
|
Post by MichaelMartini on Jan 28, 2015 20:36:17 GMT -5
They should bring Money in the Bank back and have Bryan win. I noticed this on Wreddit earlier, thought some of you might be interested... Outside of Daniel Bryan vs. Ziggler and the intrigue of seeing Sting wrestle in a WWE ring, I can't say this excites me. It's there. That's not MITB. |
|
|
|
Post by The Heartbreak TWERK on Jan 28, 2015 20:37:03 GMT -5
Bryan vs Ziggler should be for the Number 1 Contender's spot.
But it won't be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Jan 28, 2015 20:37:17 GMT -5
The sad thing is that I suspect we are never getting Lesnar vs Bryan.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2015 20:38:14 GMT -5
I find it funny that people are saying Bryan/Ziggler's match won't have any meaning when we're months away from Wrestlemania. I had no idea this was the night before.
Who knows how it'll be feud-wise, let it build a bit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2015 20:39:04 GMT -5
Don't sleep on Rollins/Orton both of those guys can go. Should be a tremendous match.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Order Inferno on Jan 28, 2015 20:39:29 GMT -5
I just don't see how Taker/Bray helps anyone. Bray loses, he won't be another streak victim, so who cares. Taker loses, Bray didn't end the streak, so you beat Undertaker at Wrestlemania and it means nothing. The only match with Taker that would make sense is Sting vs. Taker and even then, that'll be good for the entrances alone. Why would Sting/Taker make sense? It was never a dream match back in the day and nearly two decades on it hasn't become any more appealing. Sting wasn't a supernatural character, he was a John Cena style hero who was wronged and became a vigilante, all he really has in common with Taker is wearing black and longevity. Taker needs and will most likely receive a win post streak and I would rather not have that win be over Sting given how he buried nearly every WCW guy he worked with in the invasion, it would be one final chance for him to spit on WCW's grave. At least if you pair him up with Wyatt, you can have a master v student storyline with dark tricks, mind games and theatrics up the wazoo, plus Wyatt won't really be harmed by the loss as post Cena he doesn't have much credibility to lose and there's no shame in taking an all time great to the limit in one of his final few matches. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2015 20:40:30 GMT -5
Looks good enough to stream
|
|
