|
|
Post by Big DSR Energy on Feb 16, 2007 23:02:43 GMT -5
I think when MVP appeared on RAW, 3/4 of the TNA viewers switched to WWE just to see his greatness. Hence MVP >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TNA I know that was my situation. MVP is great! |
|
|
|
Post by joeman on Feb 17, 2007 0:03:12 GMT -5
I think when MVP appeared on RAW, 3/4 of the TNA viewers switched to WWE just to see his greatness. Hence MVP >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TNA I know that was my situation. MVP is great! His theme music won me over. 1 2. You here the clock ticking? Tick-tock, You about to stop living. Tick-tock, I want you to remember me. Tick-tock, but the day don't have no memory. I'm coming! |
|
|
|
Post by spongeboobnopants on Feb 17, 2007 1:13:32 GMT -5
just for all to know, RAW also was down so its not like people were turned off by TNA and switched just to RAW
|
|
|
|
Post by 'Sweet n' Sour' A. A. Estrada on Feb 17, 2007 1:18:23 GMT -5
And here's Sakura with the 'LOL @ TNA'.  |
|
|
|
Post by Timmy8271 on Feb 17, 2007 5:51:38 GMT -5
I tried watching both shows but Raw I thought was very good. I turn onto TNA and see Jackie Moore in a arm wrestling match, that right there made me turn off.
|
|
audace12
Trap-Jaw
Harris is God
Posts: 261
|
Post by audace12 on Feb 17, 2007 5:58:18 GMT -5
TNA is too young,nowadays main eventers must be at least 45 years old to draw audience.
|
|
|
|
Post by REDUNBECK~! on Feb 17, 2007 7:40:43 GMT -5
just for all to know, RAW also was down so its not like people were turned off by TNA and switched just to RAW No, but it does say which company takes priority in the minds of a large number of wrestling fans. |
|
|
|
Post by GrantM on Feb 17, 2007 7:58:14 GMT -5
Wow...almost as low as WSX. Wonder what the "TNA is gonna destroy WWE and become the new #1 promotion" shooters are gonna say now. I was going to ask the same thing, I bet the YouTube shooters are having a field day over this news |
|
|
|
Post by royboy8 on Feb 17, 2007 11:03:19 GMT -5
HAHAHAHAHA. Maybe this will finally tell TNA to stop trying to 1) Be a mini WWE 2) Quit talking about the E on their programs and trying to compete with them.
Tna is nowhere near Raw's league, if they can ever realize that, they might get back to putting on good shows featuring WRESTLING(GASP) and provide people with an alternative like they once did.
|
|
|
|
Post by maxx420 on Feb 17, 2007 12:27:19 GMT -5
HAHAHAHAHA. Maybe this will finally tell TNA to stop trying to 1) Be a mini WWE 2) Quit talking about the E on their programs and trying to compete with them. Tna is nowhere near Raw's league, if they can ever realize that, they might get back to putting on good shows featuring WRESTLING(GASP) and provide people with an alternative like they once did. But they (or perhaps more accurately, Russo) can't help but notice that WWE is drawing bigger numbers with stupid crap like Donald/ Rosie, Big Dick Johnson, etc. What they fail to realize is that WWE is probably getting those numbers INSPITE of the stupid skits & angles, not because of them. |
|
|
|
Post by Richard on Feb 17, 2007 15:22:30 GMT -5
just for all to know, RAW also was down so its not like people were turned off by TNA and switched just to RAW No, but it does say which company takes priority in the minds of a large number of wrestling fans. It also tells me that 1/2 of TNA's audience are WWE fans first. |
|
Chainsaw
T
A very BAD man.
It is what it is
Posts: 90,480
|
Post by Chainsaw on Feb 17, 2007 15:45:20 GMT -5
Well, there goes the two-hour deal.  |
|
|
|
Post by Richard on Feb 17, 2007 15:50:36 GMT -5
Well, there goes the two-hour deal. Actually, I think it gives Spike and TNA more of a reason to go forward with 2 hours. They can argue that 1 hour hasn't given them the time to get on par with WWE but, 2 hours a week will give them more of a chance. I also think the Saturday replay hurt them badly as well. Why choice between them when TNA is replayed on Saturdays? |
|
|
|
Post by Arturo Classico on Feb 17, 2007 16:10:32 GMT -5
Seriously guys did you think Impact would get numbers going head to head with WWE Raw? Of course not. It did worse than i thought but people wanted to see Raw instead and the real number to watch for is the replay. Also this shows right now TNA can't compete as WCW was having trouble competing before nWo. They need some angle that would totally change wrestling as we know it. I have no clue what that could be if they could discover it they will get much bettere ratings and I feel to develop the product two hours are necessary.
|
|
Chainsaw
T
A very BAD man.
It is what it is
Posts: 90,480
|
Post by Chainsaw on Feb 17, 2007 16:19:06 GMT -5
Seriously guys did you think Impact would get numbers going head to head with WWE Raw? Of course not. It did worse than i thought but people wanted to see Raw instead and the real number to watch for is the replay. Also this shows right now TNA can't compete as WCW was having trouble competing before nWo. They need some angle that would totally change wrestling as we know it. I have no clue what that could be if they could discover it they will get much bettere ratings and I feel to develop the product two hours are necessary. I wasn't expecting them to get numbers, but I was hoping they would. I'm an optimist when it comes ti underdogs. |
|
hollywood
King Koopa
the bullet dodger
The Green Arrow has approved this post.
Posts: 11,122
|
Post by hollywood on Feb 17, 2007 18:15:51 GMT -5
It's probably a good thing they don't have 2 hours right now. Imagine the clusterf*** that would result if Russo were allowed to write for twice as long.
|
|
|
|
Post by Confused Mark Wahlberg on Feb 17, 2007 18:19:26 GMT -5
Most people (at least on this forum) only seem to watch RAW to whine about how awful it was. So, yeah, there'll be alot of moaners watching that replay.  I used to do that. But the last 2 weeks I just skipped RAW. No point in watching a crap show. I watched Impact last night instead. Oh, so you were the one. |
|
hollywood
King Koopa
the bullet dodger
The Green Arrow has approved this post.
Posts: 11,122
|
Post by hollywood on Feb 17, 2007 18:20:45 GMT -5
I used to do that. But the last 2 weeks I just skipped RAW. No point in watching a crap show. I watched Impact last night instead. Oh, so you were the one. Nah, there had to have been at least 2 or 3 more to get a rating as high as they got.  |
|
|
|
Post by Arturo Classico on Feb 17, 2007 18:32:45 GMT -5
I watched Impact. I was way more entertained by Impact than I was by Raw which has two hours and accomplishes nothing.
|
|
|
|
Post by REDUNBECK~! on Feb 17, 2007 18:42:19 GMT -5
I watched Impact. I was way more entertained by Impact than I was by Raw which has two hours and accomplishes nothing. And iMPACT did accomplish something? |
|
