|
|
Post by Jason on Feb 2, 2010 0:20:17 GMT -5
After Raw tonight, it looks like they're doing Cena w/ Bret vs Batista w/ Vince at Wrestlemania. TERRIBLE idea. I don't mind Batista in this storyline, since he kinda looks right with Vince, but Bret Hart, a real WRESTLER accompanying a guy who wrestles in baggy shorts and tennis shoes, just isn't right. Cena vs Batista II is fine by me, but please, if you're doing this match, exclude both of them.
This is probably the biggest storyline on Raw atm, for once WWE, keep your golden boy OUT. Thanks!
Modded title to cut down on dupe threads ~ Ric
|
|
|
|
Post by Bang Bang Bart on Feb 2, 2010 0:21:17 GMT -5
Who would you rather have?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Feb 2, 2010 0:22:02 GMT -5
Biggest face on Raw so it would make sense AND it keeps him outta the title picture? I got no problem with Cena being part of this storyline.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fishbone is Marshall Law on Feb 2, 2010 0:22:27 GMT -5
This is probably the biggest storyline on Raw atm, WWE will always include their golden boy. Even though he has absolutely nothing to do with the Screwjob.
|
|
Jonathan Michaels
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
The Archduke of Levity
Here since TNA was still kinda okay
Posts: 18,184
|
Post by Jonathan Michaels on Feb 2, 2010 0:23:20 GMT -5
Biggest face on Raw so it would make sense AND it keeps him outta the title picture? I got no problem with Cena being part of this storyline. That's pretty much my thinking. |
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Feb 2, 2010 0:23:40 GMT -5
I hate to sound like a dick here, but talking about Cena not being a traditional "wrestler" and ragging on his shorts? Did this post dig it's way from the depths of 2006?
|
|
|
|
Post by celticjobber on Feb 2, 2010 0:24:53 GMT -5
Bret has said in several interviews that he respects Cena and wishes he could work with him.
|
|
|
|
Post by "The Rated XXX Superstar" Jed on Feb 2, 2010 0:25:21 GMT -5
But how does Cena vs. Batista in any way solve Bret vs. Vince?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jason on Feb 2, 2010 0:25:23 GMT -5
Who would you rather have? Hart Dynasty (w/Bret) vs DX (w/Vince) Shawn Michaels (w/Bret) vs Triple H (w/Vince) This is Trump vs McMahon all over again. They're absolutely ruining it by inserting Cena into this. It's just not the same as Batista with Vince. Cena doesn't have "the look" of a wrestler like Bret Hart does and it will look wrong, and will completely ruin the storyline. It just looks extremely out of place and makes no sense. Vince has the big jacked up guy to beat down Bret, I get it. My stomach turned when they started chanting Cena's name. |
|
|
|
Post by BorneAgain on Feb 2, 2010 0:26:03 GMT -5
Cena's the face of the company and the main guy, just as Bret once was. He's the perfect guy for the spot. And going against his biggest competitor, the same man who became a top star as he did is the cherry on top.
Plus it'll be Cena's first non-title match at Wrestlemania. That's enough reason right there to put him in this spot.
|
|
Celgress
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
The Superior One
Posts: 19,009
|
Post by Celgress on Feb 2, 2010 0:26:31 GMT -5
Biggest face on Raw so it would make sense AND it keeps him outta the title picture? I got no problem with Cena being part of this storyline. Same here, I do however have a problem with Cena being back in the title picture so quickly. As such it seems like the perfect fit to me. |
|
|
|
Post by Tiger Millionaire on Feb 2, 2010 0:27:12 GMT -5
The screwjob was in 1997. Unless your what now, at least 20, 21, you really don't have that much personally interested in the angle. Moreover, who knows how much Bret can actually go in the ring at this point.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tiger Millionaire on Feb 2, 2010 0:29:22 GMT -5
Who would you rather have? Hart Dynasty (w/Bret) vs DX (w/Vince) Shawn Michaels (w/Bret) vs Triple H (w/Vince) This is Trump vs McMahon all over again. They're absolutely ruining it by inserting Cena into this. It's just not the same as Batista with Vince. Cena doesn't have "the look" of a wrestler like Bret Hart does and it will look wrong, and will completely ruin the storyline. It just looks extremely out of place and makes no sense. Vince has the big jacked up guy to beat down Bret, I get it. My stomach turned when they started chanting Cena's name. I hate to tell you this, but Bret Hart did not have the look of a traditional wrestler. He wore those shades, had that greasy hair, and wore pink. Not very traditional if you ask me. |
|
|
|
Post by "The Rated XXX Superstar" Jed on Feb 2, 2010 0:29:50 GMT -5
Moreover, who knows how much Bret can actually go in the ring at this point. I agree with this. Bret's my childhood hero, but I fear he may have lost it. Those punches looked pretty weak tonight. |
|
|
|
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Feb 2, 2010 0:30:13 GMT -5
The screwjob was in 1997. Unless your what now, at least 20, 21, you really don't have that much personally interested in the angle. Moreover, who knows how much Bret can actually go in the ring at this point. I gotta believe he can't do much of anything at all.. even bump really, otherwise the Batista attack woulda had a powerbomb, spinebuster, something. Which makes the Cena/Batista thing make even more sense; if you can't really get physicality outta Bret and Vince, having 'avatars' ( so to speak) by two of the top guys fits. |
|
|
|
Post by brettappedout (BLM) on Feb 2, 2010 0:30:26 GMT -5
But how does Cena vs. Batista in any way solve Bret vs. Vince? Cena was the one to finally convince Vince to bring Bret back to RAW so Bret could have a better ending then last time. Vince probably hired Batista because he knew Bret would attack him. In the next couple weeks Cena will make a save and next week most likely will come out and bash Vince alittle before moving on to his Chamber promo. Kill 2 birds with 1 promo. Fits in my eyes. |
|
Celgress
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
The Superior One
Posts: 19,009
|
Post by Celgress on Feb 2, 2010 0:30:37 GMT -5
.....Moreover, who knows how much Bret can actually go in the ring at this point. I'm thinking not that much, judging by how gently they've treated him during the in ring "beatdowns". |
|
|
|
Post by Jason on Feb 2, 2010 0:31:43 GMT -5
Hart Dynasty (w/Bret) vs DX (w/Vince) Shawn Michaels (w/Bret) vs Triple H (w/Vince) This is Trump vs McMahon all over again. They're absolutely ruining it by inserting Cena into this. It's just not the same as Batista with Vince. Cena doesn't have "the look" of a wrestler like Bret Hart does and it will look wrong, and will completely ruin the storyline. It just looks extremely out of place and makes no sense. Vince has the big jacked up guy to beat down Bret, I get it. My stomach turned when they started chanting Cena's name. I hate to tell you this, but Bret Hart did not have the look of a traditional wrestler. He wore those shades, had that greasy hair, and wore pink. Not very traditional if you ask me. But he wrestled like one. Cena is the big powerhouse who does shoulder blocks and scoop slams. It just doesn't fit and I feel that the storyline is ruined. And why haven't the Hart Dynasty been involved with this? Anything, even a face turn where they give the Hart Attack to Vince next week, whatever. It's very unrealistic knowing that his own family is on the other show and they havent interacted once. |
|
|
|
Post by Tiger Millionaire on Feb 2, 2010 0:33:26 GMT -5
I hate to tell you this, but Bret Hart did not have the look of a traditional wrestler. He wore those shades, had that greasy hair, and wore pink. Not very traditional if you ask me. But he wrestled like one. Cena is the big powerhouse who does shoulder blocks and scoop slams. It just doesn't fit and I feel that the storyline is ruined. And why haven't the Hart Dynasty been involved with this? Anything, even a face turn where they give the Hart Attack to Vince next week, whatever. It's very unrealistic knowing that his own family is on the other show and they havent interacted once. Bret tagged with a big powerhouse for years, and I would say that it was pretty successful. |
|
|
|
Post by celticjobber on Feb 2, 2010 0:40:08 GMT -5
Who would you rather have? Hart Dynasty (w/Bret) vs DX (w/Vince) Shawn Michaels (w/Bret) vs Triple H (w/Vince) This is Trump vs McMahon all over again. They likely didn't want DX involved because Bret , Hunter, and Shawn still probably aren't the best of friends and didn't want to work together. And also because WWE didn't want fans to be forced into choosing who to cheer for in a situation with Bret going against Shawn. And I think the Trump/McMahon angle actually lead to one of the biggest 'Mania buyrates in recent years. |
|
